Seeing how twitter can ban people for legal speech I don’t see how logically they can force this woman to MAKE a website for two faggots. They are more than welcome to make their own website.
Also just in a general sense, it’s simply not a service she provides.
It appears the gays and their lawyers are fascists
I wonder if Gorsuch will make up law out of thin air (again) if this goes to SCOTUS.
Yep!
Take the money and be sure to loudly let them know that you’ll be given a portion of the earnings to your favorite Conservative cause or possibly the National Rifle Association.
If you think someone is so awful/bigoted - why in the world would you want to give them money? Makes zero sense.
This is just to torture someone for not sharing their worldview - not to get a product from them, which is available elsewhere.
Please, please, please. Will some gay couple please go to a Muslim-owned bakery, and demand a wedding cake.
You need the financial backing of Right Wing groups to pay the lawyers to make the case.
The Left has the backing of left wing millionaires and billionaires who are intent on destroying the USA.
The real question is why the several SCOTUS rulings are not enforceable in these Colorado cases?
Also, since outside parties are financing these lawsuits, why is the IRS not involved since plaintiffs are receiving taxable income to finance the suites?
Easy, make them a website that is so buggy and crappy that they will never come back.
As for the wedding cake, would you REALLY want a cake from a person who really didn’t want to make it? (Think about the chocolate pie in The Help).
Charge them an outrageous fee, do a lousy job and then see what happens. There are many ways around this bulverism, just
takes some time. Get your money, close the business, incorporate under a different name and let the sodomites chase you. just stay one step ahead.
You don’t have to do this in North Korea, China or Iran.
I wouldn’t have any problem creating a website for them. But they wouldn’t like it.
Buy a URL such as “fagweddingsRus.com” create a background of two men holding hands and then have it superimposed with a 404 message. Or, even worse, make them register their names on it first. For grins, include a Scripture verse. For even more fun, throw up a link that takes them to the Westboro Baptist Church website.
A court might force you to put up a site but it can’t force you to make it a working site. The owner is out the cost of a URL registration and minimal web design plus hosting but they can have some fun with this.
What happened to Article I Section 8?
To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;As a "designer" and "publisher," doesn't she have a Constitutional "exclusive" right to her "writings" of the code for her websites?
Doesn't she have her 1st amendment right to a free press? In 1789, the "press" referred to the machine, the printing press. The right of the people to a free press was the right to publish.
Doesn't her right to a free press allow her to choose what she wishes to publish or not publish?
-PJ
Wonder if a gay baker was ever forced to make a cake with “I hate fags” written on it. Why is it only homos bothering Christians?
Appeal all the way to SCOTUS.
If I was a web designer, could the courts force me to work for clients who wanted me to prepare a pornographic site for them? Could I tell the Klan to take a hike? Could I let Louis Farrakhan know he had to go somewhere else for his website?
Can't afford to sue, broadcast over the entire Internet.
Because, well, they just couldn’t find a gay web designer.