Posted on 07/27/2021 6:51:17 PM PDT by blueplum
AColorado web designer is appealing a ruling made Monday by the 10th Circuit Court that rejected her challenge of Colorado's anti-discrimination law and requires her to create wedding websites for same-sex couples despite it violating her religious beliefs.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit ruled 2 – 1 the state can force Lorie Smith of studio 303 Creative to design and publish websites promoting messages that go against her personal religious beliefs. The law at issue also prevents Smith from explaining on her company's website what sites she can create that are consistent with her beliefs.
By making the decision, the three-judge panel overturned a lower court ruling throwing out ...
(Excerpt) Read more at newsweek.com ...
Seeing how twitter can ban people for legal speech I don’t see how logically they can force this woman to MAKE a website for two faggots. They are more than welcome to make their own website.
Also just in a general sense, it’s simply not a service she provides.
It appears the gays and their lawyers are fascists
I wonder if Gorsuch will make up law out of thin air (again) if this goes to SCOTUS.
Yep!
Take the money and be sure to loudly let them know that you’ll be given a portion of the earnings to your favorite Conservative cause or possibly the National Rifle Association.
And here I thought involuntary servitude had been outlawed!
If you think someone is so awful/bigoted - why in the world would you want to give them money? Makes zero sense.
This is just to torture someone for not sharing their worldview - not to get a product from them, which is available elsewhere.
Go the next step... What’s to prevent them from telling an artist what can be painted, or a writer what can be written? I don’t think I’m being hyperbolic here, but if they can force you to convey certain thoughts on a website or a wedding cake, why not any medium at all?
Please, please, please. Will some gay couple please go to a Muslim-owned bakery, and demand a wedding cake.
No.
You need the financial backing of Right Wing groups to pay the lawyers to make the case.
The Left has the backing of left wing millionaires and billionaires who are intent on destroying the USA.
The real question is why the several SCOTUS rulings are not enforceable in these Colorado cases?
Also, since outside parties are financing these lawsuits, why is the IRS not involved since plaintiffs are receiving taxable income to finance the suites?
Been done.
The courts sided with the mohammedans.
Did you really expect anything else?
Easy, make them a website that is so buggy and crappy that they will never come back.
As for the wedding cake, would you REALLY want a cake from a person who really didn’t want to make it? (Think about the chocolate pie in The Help).
Not when it comes to gays.
Exactly.
While we're at it, why can't they decide who you can marry?
Charge them an outrageous fee, do a lousy job and then see what happens. There are many ways around this bulverism, just
takes some time. Get your money, close the business, incorporate under a different name and let the sodomites chase you. just stay one step ahead.
You don’t have to do this in North Korea, China or Iran.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.