Posted on 05/13/2021 6:54:09 AM PDT by NobleFree
Actually it speaks more to the delusional moral Authority that Libertarians think they have over everyone else. You are not for Liberty, you are for license, you want everything immoral to be allowed with no controls on morality of any kind by any law. You wanted to be a free-for-all. This is why Libertarians should never have power.
There is for a Sched II Narcotic. A big leap to remove in USC. Cannabis/Marijuana THC is a Sched. II agent. Every physician knows this. Prescribe Marinol— legal prescription THC per ora with a specific indication.
Clinicians know this, as do the “industry”. Nice argument though. Govt. by regulation is what is had— and the subject of massive amounts of money from illegal trade. See: Cartels,oh and fentanyl laced weed, fentanyl from Chi-Coms (not the usual way through anaesthesiology applications)- thus it is a natsec issue. Narcoterror. remember them? Dey still out dere, making life pleasant and supporting the “defund” initiatives.
And, there most certainly is a precendent legal Constitutional argument. Very different from any 10th Amendment argument. Federalist decisions. Got no problem with CBD and the legitimate use for clinically indicated uses. Zero THC. And don’t get started on pharmacology- no time. Have another stiff for COD.
People who support drug legalization have lost their minds
Is that a "yes, I'm against federal adherence to the Constitution"?
Actually it speaks more to the delusional moral Authority that Libertarians think they have over everyone else. You are not for Liberty, you are for license, you want everything immoral to be allowed with no controls on morality of any kind by any law. You wanted to be a free-for-all.
You got all that from "federal adherence to the Constitution"? Amazing.
There is for a Sched II Narcotic.
Wrong - there is no Constitutional argument for the federal Controlled Substances Act or its schedules.
fentanyl laced weed, fentanyl from Chi-Coms (not the usual way through anaesthesiology applications)- thus it is a natsec issue.
There is no Constitutional argument for federal involvement in anything and everything that can be labeled "natsec." The feds have the authority to forbid importation of fentanyl - but not to forbid anything that can potentially be laced with illegally imported fentanyl.
Your constant repetition in order to avoid the point that I made only proves me even more correct
People who support drug legalization have lost their minds
Is that a "yes, I'm against federal adherence to the Constitution"?
Actually it speaks more to the delusional moral Authority that Libertarians think they have over everyone else.
I'm not a Libertarian, I'm a constitutionalist. Are you?
You are not for Liberty, you are for license, you want everything immoral to be allowed with no controls on morality of any kind by any law. You wanted to be a free-for-all.
Ending unconstitutional federal involvement in within-state marijuana policy will not yield a "free-for-all".
“If trucking firms are using the standard marijuana test that detects use from as long as weeks ago, they should stop shooting themselves in the foot.”
All marijuana testing of truck drivers should be thrown out.
Driving while impaired should remain illegal; trucking firms should hire and fire as they please - but I recommend they do so on rational bases.
You’re promoting drugs like a Libertarian and you’re promoting drugs like a liberal so I don’t even know why you’re on this website
“You’re promoting drugs”
False. What I promote is that the federal government cease to do something it never had Constitutional authority to do. As is entirely appropriate for a pro-Constitution site.
false
“You’re promoting drugs like a Libertarian and you’re promoting drugs like a liberal so I don’t even know why you’re on this website”
Our obvious and dedicated enemies like Russia, CCP, and Iran are on Noblefree’s side. Dedicated Leftists, too.
Now I’m reading that our armed troops are using weed to “combat boredom”.
The Constitution is on my side.
ACLU too...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.