Posted on 05/13/2021 6:54:09 AM PDT by NobleFree
Good. It’s a state’s rights issue. Let them decide. This isn’t in the FedGov’s swimlane.
I am surprised.
Just think, the maryjane purchaser ID could be used as a voter ID as well. Less bulk in the wallet, after all.
Just what America needs, more brain rot.
Priorities
My fellow congresscritters the masses are on to our wicked ways ... Quick we must distract and confuse them and the money will continue to flow
Note that neither Adams nor any other Founding Father ever said that laws against debauchery could make people non-debauched.
This would be a nice step in the right direction...
Funny — a lot of the dems are more drug warriors than the GOP is today. A lot of folks on the GOP side have seen the benefit on folks coping with PTSD and depression. A lot of veterans, IOW. Stuff dies have some medical purposes.
A few years ago I started pushing a meme I now strongly believe: The US is like the EU, except we have a military.
That is, we are 50 “mostly sovereign” countries that are members of a single federation. That federation (the FedGov) exists to provide protection from enemies from outside, protect member countries from each other, and handle situations when stuff crosses borders between member countries.
Beyond that, they should leave us all the hell alone. One writer once said that before the IRS existed, the only contact most citizens had with the FedGov was the mailman.
Any way, my thinking is of the founders. We are a federation of membership nations which control virtually everything that goes down within their own borders.
We can either properly claim this as a states rights and personal freedom issue, or let the other side do it. Frankly, I’m surprised they haven’t shoved a bill through already.
This is gonna hurt the search & seizure industry. That, and the prison industry.
Why is any of that the proper business of the federal government? Do the feds impose licensing and ID requirements for the sale and purchase of the drug alcohol?
Before prohibition, there was no federal control of drugs. They were legal as far as the FedGov was concerned. Sadly, only the alcohol part of prohibition was reversed.
America has been using marijuana for generations despite federal law. And nowhere in the Constitution are the feds authorized to regulate within-state marijuana policy, even in the name of fighting "brain rot."
I think taking profit opportunities away from violent criminals is a good thing; perhaps you feel differently.
The Feds regulate alcohol very closely. Excise tax, labeling, mandating 21 as the drinking age, and permitting state distribution and retailing laws to trump rules did free interstate commerce that apply to most other things.
"And another thing, I don't like marijuana."
Oh. Okay. We'll pass a law. Anything else I can do for you today?"
“Any way, my thinking is of the founders. We are a federation of membership nations which control virtually everything that goes down within their own borders.”
I agree, and have always said the same thing. Most folks should never even think about the federal government, much less have contact with it.
I often ask folks if they realize the difference it’d make in their lives if the amount they’re paying in federal taxes actually went to their state government, and the amount they’re paying in state taxes went to the federal government. You listed the limits of federal power, and if we reversed taxation that would almost certainly happen.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.