Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oprah Interview Proves Harry And Meghan Are Boring
The Federalist ^ | March 8, 2021 | Emily Jashinsky

Posted on 03/08/2021 7:56:39 AM PST by Kaslin

The interview was loaded with apparent revelations. But there's absolutely no way around the he-said-she-said dynamic that characterizes this conflict.


Regardless of how many sit-down interviews they grant or how real their reality show gets, we’re destined to observe the royal family from afar. Oprah Winfrey’s interview with Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, which aired Sunday night, ostensibly peeled back the curtain on their troubled relationship with the House of Windsor.

Of course, we don’t actually know that it did anything of the sort. The newly minted Californians coordinated the primetime special to tell their side of the story. That’s how this goes. According to Harry and Meghan, who left their roles as senior members of the royal family, they did “everything [they] could to make it work.” The queen may have a different take. (Although we likely won’t hear it in a splashy TV interview.)

Markle told Oprah she’d experienced “suicidal thoughts,” explaining, “I went to the institution and I said that I needed to go somewhere to get help…and I was told that I couldn’t.”

“I went to one of the most senior people to get help. I was told I couldn’t because it wouldn’t be good for the institution,” said Markle.

Harry on his father Prince Charles:
There is a lot to work though there. I feel really let do. He’s been through something similar.
He knows what pain feels like.
And Archie is his grandson.
I will always love him but there is a lot of hurt that has happened#OprahMeghanHarry

— Chris Ship (@chrisshipitv) March 8, 2021

Harry on Prince William: The relationship is one of "space at the moment" and time heals all things hopefully.
Meghan: I regret believing them (the Palace) when they said I would be protected.#OprahMeghanHarry

— Chris Ship (@chrisshipitv) March 8, 2021

“I’m comfortable knowing we did everything we did to make it work.”

Both Harry and Meghan tell Oprah they did everything they could to make their roles work, but ultimately the institution and family let them down.#OprahMeghanHarry

— Omid Scobie (@scobie) March 8, 2021

Prince Harry says the Royal Family cut him off financially at the start of 2020 (after announcing plans to step back from royal roles) but says he was able to afford security for his family because of the money his mother, Princess Diana, left behind.#OprahMeghanHarry

— Omid Scobie (@scobie) March 8, 2021

Harry: If it were not for Meghan, I wouldn’t not have been able to leave. I felt trapped as well.
I was trapped but I didn’t know I was trapped.#OprahMeghanHarry

— Chris Ship (@chrisshipitv) March 8, 2021

Harry says the royal family has an issue with race “For this union and the specifics around race there were opportunities for my family to show some public support. No one from my family ever said anything. That hurts.” #HarryandMeghanonOprah #MeghanAndHarry

— Roya Nikkhah (@RoyaNikkhah) March 8, 2021

Meghan: They took away Harry's security. I wrote letters to his family – I accept that I couldn't;t have it. But I said "please keep keep my husband safe. Please don’t pull his security. And they said it’s not just possible".#OprahMeghanHarry

— Chris Ship (@chrisshipitv) March 8, 2021

The couple said they felt “trapped” as royals. Meghan said she begged unsuccessfully for Harry’s security to remain. Harry said his family “literally” cut him off, and he’s living on money left by his mother.

In reference to rumors swirling around her wedding, Markle claimed it was actually Kate Middleton who made her cry, despite reports to the contrary. Harry said his relationship with Prince William involves “space at the moment.”

They were married in a private ceremony three days before their public wedding. They’re now expecting a baby girl in the summer, but want only two children. Floating a huge allegation, Markle said before the birth of her son there were internal “concerns and conversations about how dark his skin might be when he’s born.”

The interview was loaded with apparent revelations. But there’s absolutely no way around the he-said-she-said dynamic that characterizes this conflict.

The crown wants to protect itself. Harry and Meghan want to protect themselves as well. Given the necessarily public nature of their spat, both sides must now manipulate the media in their favor to succeed. Whether you love Markle or hate her, what you’re seeing is a curated media character striving to achieve an illusion of authenticity.

I confess to being viscerally irritated by Americans’ palace intrigue over the royal family. Women project onto royals because their privilege makes it seem okay, so controversial royals are incredible gossip fodder, like homecoming queens and trust-fund princesses. British tabloids are a different beast, but it seems inevitable that Markle’s admitted struggles with fame-induced mental health problems will spark comparisons with Britney Spears.

For the public, it seems like a trade-off. Markle and Spears get fame and money, so we get to joke when they gain ten pounds or have an off day. We get to speculate about their family drama and they get to jet set. Is it fair? Tabloid culture is certainly a response to demand. Demand is not always or even often broadly moral.

Markle is notoriously sanctimonious. She lectures the world from her position of immense power and privilege. She has the vapid politics of a Zinn-chugging liberal arts graduate. Depending on which rumors you believe, she’s not very nice either. But who knows what’s real in a battle for the narrative? It’s not possible, so you might as well just stop investing in the fight.

At play here are deep international dynamics, the trading of literal royalty for America’s decadent version of it in Hollywood. Emotive millennials pointedly bucking their conservative family’s tradition of stoicism, swapping dignified roles and their inevitable constraints for self-indulgence.

We’re all projecting a lot onto this couple. The comment that struck me most was Harry’s claim his family is “scared” of British tabloids and acts accordingly. Powerful people being scared of the free press? What an incredible concept.

Here in the states, where Harry and Meghan have chosen to make their home, reality star Bethenny Frankel deleted a critical tweet that read, “Cry me a river…the plight of being a game show host, fairly unknown actress, to suffering in a palace, w tiaras & 7 figure weddings for TWO WHOLE YEARS to being a household name w @Oprah on speed dial, fetching 7 m for interviews, hundreds of millions in media deals.” For a couple with the world at their fingertips, it’s true that Harry and Meghan do a lot of whining.

After blowback from users and outlets like TMZ, Frankel deleted the tweet and added, “I watched M & H sit down. Emotional distress & racism must feel suffocating & powerless. I’m a polarizing, unfiltered(often to a fault)flawed person w a voice. When I heard of the interview, during a pandemic, it felt like a surprising choice. I’m sorry if it hurt or offended you.”

American tabloids defend rich and powerful celebrities as long as they cloak themselves in vague wokeness. That makes California a much warmer home for Harry and Meghan for reasons beyond the weather. Here, they can have their cake and eat it too.

For all our personal and cultural projections onto the couple, “Harry and Meghan” is always just our interpretation of the family’s media tug-of-war. We have little access to the reality at hand, which is carefully clouded by the resources of enormously powerful people. Why bother squinting?

Don Draper said it best. Love her or hate her, the best approach to Meghan Markle is simply not to think about her at all.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: celebrities; celebritygossip; gossip; harryandmeghan; meghanmarkle; oprah; oprahinterview; princeharry; royalfamily; royalgrifters; whocares
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-162 next last

1 posted on 03/08/2021 7:56:39 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Boring? I can think of nothing I would rather do than listen to some talentless Hollywood prima donna and her toy boy flog their dirty linen in public and let us know how badly they are being treated while demanding their privacy.


2 posted on 03/08/2021 8:02:42 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

Apparently the ratings on this broadcast were massive, which doesn’t speak well for America....


3 posted on 03/08/2021 8:04:45 AM PST by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

“I confess to being viscerally irritated by Americans’ palace intrigue over the royal family.”

No one gives a flying pile of crap about you or your mutt wife. Get a job, and quit whining and complaining. Be a man for once, punk.


4 posted on 03/08/2021 8:05:10 AM PST by Carriage Hill (A society grows great when old men plant trees, in whose shade they know they will never sit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

> After blowback from users and outlets like TMZ, Frankel deleted the tweet... <

Wow. Cancel culture strikes again. Now you cannot even criticize two obvious grifters like Harry and Meghan.

Self-pitying royalty + Meghan’s race card + Oprah ... that must be one powerful combination.


5 posted on 03/08/2021 8:06:40 AM PST by Leaning Right (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

There are some issues here.

A key problem seems to be that she gave up everything about her previous life, to become a member of the royal family. She apparently didn’t appreciate that her job was being a member of the family and representing the family at public events. She didn’t realize she had to sit down and shut up and be a good duchess, to live in seclusion and had to ask permission of some unknown individuals in The Firm to go out to lunch with friends.

And it seems she doesn’t have the type of personality and demeanor, to accommodate herself to everything that was expected of her.


6 posted on 03/08/2021 8:06:41 AM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

My former sister-in-law has written a cookbook. Was supposed to be on Good Morning America sometime after 7:00 AM this morning. I never watch GMA, but turned over this morning to see her interview. After suffering through about 30 minutes of their normal garbage, and barfed up with the Harry and Meghan mega-garbage, I gave up because I had to go to work. The bad taste will be in my system for weeks. Still love my little sister-in-law, even though she has capitulated into full libtard with her husband. But they are living the good life in Southern Cal. She caught a ride on the elitist train.


7 posted on 03/08/2021 8:07:57 AM PST by RatRipper ( Democrats and socialists are vile liars, thdieves and murderers - enemies of good and America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

The fact they moved to California when every right thinking human is doing everything to bail from there proves those bozo’s have a collective IQ of 50.


8 posted on 03/08/2021 8:08:24 AM PST by ImJustAnotherOkie (All I know is The I read in the papers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Floating a huge allegation, Markle said before the birth of her son there were internal “concerns and conversations about how dark his skin might be when he’s born.”

And they both refused to source this allegation and Doprah just accepted it without making them back it up.

9 posted on 03/08/2021 8:08:49 AM PST by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

Yep


10 posted on 03/08/2021 8:09:46 AM PST by Guenevere (When the foundations are being destroyed what can the righteous do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation
Apparently the ratings on this broadcast were massive, which doesn’t speak well for America....

People love soap operas and this is a real-life one with a vapid prima donna at the center of it.

11 posted on 03/08/2021 8:12:59 AM PST by Rummyfan (In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. Support Israel.d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Markle is a Murky Mess.


12 posted on 03/08/2021 8:13:34 AM PST by PGalt (past peak civilization?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"Floating a huge allegation, Markle said before the birth of her son there were internal “concerns and conversations about how dark his skin might be when he’s born.”

What utter crap!

Markle looks anything but black. She looks whiter than most southern European whites. And with the father being a pale skinned red head the kids are going to look irish

Sue enough, here's a picture of her with her redhead son. Cute boy!


13 posted on 03/08/2021 8:13:42 AM PST by aquila48 (Do not let them make you care! Guilting you is how they control you. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The American Republic is crumbling before our eyes and people make the time and effort to watch this British Royal Dumpster Fire?

Whatever keeps the Sheep in line I guess, like sending out those $1,400 Kung Flu Bribery Checks.


14 posted on 03/08/2021 8:14:24 AM PST by Kickass Conservative (Don't blame me, I Voted for the guy who actually Won the 2020 Presidential Election...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This won't end well for either of them.


15 posted on 03/08/2021 8:14:35 AM PST by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Proves they are Grifters.


16 posted on 03/08/2021 8:15:42 AM PST by tennmountainman ( Liberals Are Baby Killers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

Well, they are in southern California because of wanting to be close to the entertainment industry. I’m sure they see a big future in the entertainment world somewhere.


17 posted on 03/08/2021 8:15:51 AM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Oprah/Harpo watch? No chance. Harpo & Marko should team up. Good comedy team.


18 posted on 03/08/2021 8:16:11 AM PST by PGalt (past peak civilization?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Meghan wasted an incredible opportunity.
Leveraging humility, she could have become apprentice to the Queen and learned & gained access to power via influence & grace. Maybe not future Queen, but close enough to really become a meaningful figure in history.
Instead, totally wrecked the chance by seeking cheap fame & money.


19 posted on 03/08/2021 8:16:35 AM PST by ctdonath2 (Interesting how those so interested in workERS are so disinterested in workING.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

There is no “royalty” in the USA. I didn’t see the “interview” between the Queen of America, the royally privileged super rich know it all, and the self-absorbed privileged attention seeking talentless couple.

Am I supposed to feel sorry for the poor “Trapped” lost souls who are raking in the millions with books, TV appearances, speaking tours and gifts?


20 posted on 03/08/2021 8:16:36 AM PST by I want the USA back (The nation is in the grips of incurable hysterical insanity, as usual.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-162 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson