[martin_fierro]

“Plaintiffs ask this Court to disenfranchise almost seven million voters. This Court has been unable to find any case in which a plaintiff has sought such a drastic remedy in the contest of an election, in terms of the sheer volume of votes asked to be invalidated,” the Obama appointee wrote.

Everything you need to know right there.

[Nateman]

In other words he crime was too big to fail...

[missnry]

“Plaintiffs ask this Court to disenfranchise almost seven million voters.

The election "officials" disenfranchised 70+ million US voters through their fraud!

[DiogenesLamp]

Plaintiffs ask this Court to disenfranchise almost seven million voters.

Well that's completely inaccurate. What they are doing is pointing out that when someone sh*ts in the soup, it doesn't really matter who did it, the soup is no longer soup.

Also, the point is that nobody really knows if these are real votes or fake votes, and letting it stand is what disenfranchises 7 million voters.

[TMN78247]

EXACTLY,
(HOW did I know that the Judge was a BHO-appointed DIMocRAT??)

Yours, TMN78247

[libertylover]

This Court has been unable to find any case in which a plaintiff has sought such a drastic remedy

But Rudy says that they had 50 witnesses ready to testify but were not allowed to testify. So, you won't find fraud if you keep your head buried in the sand.

[ConservativeInPA]

So the bigger the fraud the more impossible to invalidate the fraud. Sort of like banks too big to fail. Just prop up anything that can’t make it on its own.