After:
You can see that, almost instantly, 19,958 votes were stolen from Trump, and 19,958 votes were added to Biden's total. The timestamp on the video (not shown in my pictures) is 10:23 P.M. (CST).
After:
You can see that, almost instantly, 19,958 votes were stolen from Trump, and 19,958 votes were added to Biden's total. The timestamp on the video (not shown in my pictures) is 10:23 P.M. (CST).
bkmk
I sincerely hope that the Trump campaign’s lawyers have submitted this as part of their evidence - leading to a case proving that not only were votes stolen, but that the very software used in tallying ballots was purposely corrupted for the specific purpose of stealing the election. That, added to the panicked addition of hundreds of thousands of fraudulent ballots, makes the case pretty much ironclad.
Either of you know anything about this?
Update to the person’s research mentioned in that article:
This is an updated version of the previous ‘HAPPENING’ thread, with switches from each candidate to every other candidate, 3rd means 3rd party, all of the 3rd party candidates combined.
The script has been modified to account for precision issues, the total votes lost is the same as in the last thread.
First, we check whether when Trump lost votes, Biden gained that amount of votes, then we do the same for Trump to 3rd party, and so on when checking Biden and 3rd party for switches, afterwards, below the /////// lines, we switch the checking around, it basically means that it is certain that the candidates lost that amount of votes in total, while other candidates gained those votes, but we can’t be sure which candidate gained which votes, so I’m showing you both possibilities.
Although, it seems like if we assume that Biden got all the votes that the 3rd party lost, it would explain why he has so many votes, and why so many states flipped out of nowhere.
Everyone can interpret these numbers as they wish, for now, the only proof we have that the data used to reach this conclusion is real, is that the Antrim county glitch shows up in the data. We might be able to confirm that it is 100% real once Georgia completes their hand recount. Until then, we should be skeptical of this. But please upvote the thread so those that read the last one can get the updated information with all the switches and more correct numbers.
EDIT : To shorten the thread, I deleted the data and added it into this pastebin instead : https://pastebin.com/X6sW2aew
DO PLEASE NOTE : THIS IS NOT DEFINITIVE PROOF. WE HAVE NO IDEA IF THE EDISON DATA IS REAL AND REPRESENTS THE REAL STATUS OF THE VOTES.
We will know if this data is good or not once Georgia finishes their hand recount.
EDIT 2 : Link to the updated script, note, it’ll have to be modified to check for the 2nd case scenario, by default it’ll check just 1st case scenario, criticism is welcome but I already know the script is a mess, but I’m also confident in the results it gives.
https://workupload.com/file/DV4TvqtWEK8 Here is the script.
https://workupload.com/file/aTKhxPg2RTr And here is the data used.
Place both in the same folder.
https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8XQIWRs/-happening-ive-updated-the-switc/?sort=new
The way they did it was simple. Exclude witnesses to the vote count. Us the same ballot over and over to increase votes for Biden.
If there is no way to prevent the same ballot from being scanned multiple times, then there is the easy answer.
The title says they examined the code, but when you read the article it only talks about examining the data. We need to analyze the actual software that was in the tabulators.