Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IS IT TIME TO END OUR TWO-PARTY SYSTEM? OUR FRACTURED SOCIETY - MICHAEL SAVAGE
MichaelSavage.com ^ | Nov. 5, 2020 | Michael Savage

Posted on 11/08/2020 6:01:58 AM PST by Texan4Life

Conservative radio Talk Show host Michael Savage poses the question "Is It Time To End Our Two Party System? Our Fractured Society"


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: savage; talkradio; twoparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: Texan4Life

“Is It Time To End Our Two Party System? Our Fractured Society”


Uh, Mike, open your eyes and look around. If Biden is named the next POTUS, the 2-party system will be ended in all but name - there will NEVER be another Republican POTUS, nor a Republican House or Senate.

As for ending our fractured society, AOC is talking seriously (as much as she is capable of that) of starting up a “Trump Accountability Project” to provide payback to those who helped Trump gain and exercise power...and the list of people that project will gather is to include donors to his campaign. No worries, Mike, the new Beria will take care of the fractures in our society by simply throwing half of it into gulags...that’s what history says that governments compiling lists do with those on those lists.


41 posted on 11/08/2020 9:42:34 AM PST by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt, The Weapons Shops of Isher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

+1

I’m done with the GOP-Eeyore/Unipartistas.

I’ll be doing a lot of “undervoting” henceforth.


42 posted on 11/08/2020 9:46:01 AM PST by lightman (I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

Thomas J Anderson - Bipartisan Treason Part 1 (1967)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rij8INfuSrY


43 posted on 11/08/2020 9:46:15 AM PST by a fool in paradise (President Trump is not VP Nixon and wonÂ’t let the Democrats steal this without a fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dutch Boy
How does more parties make things better?

But coalition majorities work out so well everywhere else, don't they? Think Israel here folks.

44 posted on 11/08/2020 11:31:06 AM PST by itsahoot (The ability to read auto correct is necessary to read my posts understanding them is another matter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Texan4Life

We already have a multiparty system, nobody cares. You would have to change to a parliamentary system for that to be effective. If you want change, you have to take over a major party, just as the GOP went from paleocon to neocon to populist.


45 posted on 11/08/2020 11:59:39 AM PST by Mr. Blond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texan4Life

It’s not the “two party system” that’s the issue or the problem.

It’s not hunting down and slaughtering the sub-human filth that is our existential enemy following the pathological lies sloppily dressed up as an ideology that is the problem.

We could have a 100 parties and most of them would be dominated by these depraved degenerates because we refuse to deal with the scumbags.


46 posted on 11/08/2020 12:04:25 PM PST by Grimmy (equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

Savage put out an idea to end the Winner-Take-All setup, and whomever wins the Presidency, the VP will be of the other party, the runner-up will be VP, or if they don’t want the VP, someone else from that runner-up party.

Savage has some very insightful things he says from time to time. That’s what I admire him for.

I for one, do not daily listen to any talk show person, be it Rush, or Hannity, or Levin, or Savage. So it’s not that easy to get my panties in a wad over something said about another...


47 posted on 11/09/2020 6:16:17 AM PST by Texan4Life
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

Think Belgium !
I think they went three years with a caretaker government because the “parties” couldn’t form a coalition.


48 posted on 11/09/2020 6:23:15 AM PST by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Texan4Life

It is long past time to end the party system.
There should be no formal recognition of political parties.
There should be no primaries using government equipment and personnel.
Each candidate should run on his own. He can claim membership in whatever private organizations he likes, but nothing should be listed on the ballot but his name and whether or not he is an incumbent.


49 posted on 11/09/2020 7:01:21 AM PST by Little Ray (The Left and Right no longer have anything in common. A House divided against itself cannot stand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
I essentially agree, with one small change.

It's not the requirement of a majority in the Electoral College, it's the states' requirement of winner-take-all that does it.

If all the states were like Maine and Nebraska with congressional district apportionment of their electoral votes, we'd see more regional parties getting Electoral College votes. This would result in more cases of the House of Representatives choosing, because it reduces the number of EV that the leader will get. Siphon off enough Electoral Votes, and the 270 threshold becomes harder to meet.

-PJ

50 posted on 11/09/2020 7:08:05 AM PST by Political Junkie Too (Freedom of the press is the People's right to publish, not CNN's right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

I think removing winner-take all is more important (and the ONLY POSSIBLE) way to solve this problem.

You can’t legislate away the D and R parties.

But ending winner-take-all would do the same thing.


51 posted on 11/09/2020 7:11:35 AM PST by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing obamacare is worse than obamacare itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
The other thing about Congressional district apportionment is that it messes with the concept of a statewide slate of Electors for a candidate.

Without being sure of which CDs will win, the "slates" will be at the Congressional district level. In fact, the ballots might even just list the Electors who are "running" in your district and you vote directly for an Elector, not a President nor a party.

Currently, there is no guarantee that the Electors are dispersed in the state -- they could all come from the state capital. Congressional district level allocation of EVs would force electors to be dispersed regionally, too.

Without binding, this might even make a state's Electoral College vote an interesting exercise in coalition building, like we see in parliamentary systems.

-PJ

52 posted on 11/09/2020 7:21:29 AM PST by Political Junkie Too (Freedom of the press is the People's right to publish, not CNN's right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Texan4Life
whomever wins the Presidency, the VP will be of the other party, the runner-up will be VP,

That could certainly bring impeachments into fashion depending on who wins the House and Senate.

53 posted on 11/09/2020 7:34:13 AM PST by itsahoot (The ability to read auto correct is necessary to read my posts understanding them is another matter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson