“defense of civil unions if it was a lesser evil to stop same sex marriage”
There is no difference between the two.
hmmmm ... maybe
Is it just me, or is it the fact that Francis’ writings are so unclear that people can take it any way they want?
How many times does his handlers have to explain to people saying in effect “What he said and what he meant, isn’t what you think he said or meant”?
This is about ratifying actions which the church expressly condemns.
Francis is speaking about a secular action when he should be preaching from the roof tops about sin and its consequences.
Actually, he said this last year in an interview with a Mexican journalist for a Mexican television show. These words didn’t appear in the final broadcast interview, either because the Vatican took it out or the Mexican editors took it out.
The current appearance of these words occurs in an Italian movie, Francesco, issued by Bergoglio about Bergoglio.
So he meant it to happen. That arrogant power-crazed fat old nobody.
Here come the papal apologists.
Pope is a Dope,
It so disgusting that this fake news is everywhere- it was on page one of the Wall Street Journal as the lead feature story.
Entry number 92,468 of “What Francis really meant to say was...”, volume 249.”Clean up in Vatican, aisle 6”.
later
I read this as: Pope says, Sodomy is swell!
This sounds like Democrat party triangulating - say all sides, and they will hear the version they want to believe.
Handlersplaining.
All this pathetic attempt to cover for this apostate pope when everything he has said now and in the past makes it clear he condones sodomy.