Posted on 07/07/2020 4:52:31 PM PDT by TigerClaws
Not the country so much as the progs.
"democrat" party members.
BLM terrorists
Antifa terrorists
communist teachers and professors
RINOS
Never-Trumpers
NFAC terrorists
etc, etc
It appears that when, not if, they become too much of a RPITA there will be an escalation in pushback from normal American Citizens.
Typically things go underground at that point and the LEOs will not be able to protect the prog.
.
Civil war is brewing this is outrageous!!!
Insanity!
“have driving difficulties due to the obfuscation of driving lanes”
If I come across something like this and get into a car accident I’ll sue everyone involved from the mayor, the city council, city engineer, public works superintendent, and the blm terrorist freaks who painted it.
Better yet if it was rainy, and the paint made the road slick I could say I slipped and fell and sue for hundreds of millions.
They have just as much right to paint it out as BLM had to paint it in the first place.
It’s ironic that Martinez and neighboring Pittsburgh have a growing black population due to the fact that liberal San Francisco booted them out
I wonder if they have legal representation lined up or need a legal defense fund?
Pick-up truck, blurred license plate, barrel of paint, spray bar, 4:00am.
Here’s the text of the law:
422.6.
(a) No person, whether or not acting under color of law, shall by force or threat of force, willfully injure, intimidate, interfere with, oppress, or threaten any other person in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him or her by the Constitution or laws of this state or by the Constitution or laws of the United States in whole or in part because of one or more of the actual or perceived characteristics of the victim listed in subdivision (a) of Section 422.55.
(b) No person, whether or not acting under color of law, shall knowingly deface, damage, or destroy the real or personal property of any other person for the purpose of intimidating or interfering with the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to the other person by the Constitution or laws of this state or by the Constitution or laws of the United States, in whole or in part because of one or more of the actual or perceived characteristics of the victim listed in subdivision (a) of Section 422.55.
Here’s 422.55: (a) “Hate crime” means a criminal act committed, in whole or in part, because of one or more of the following actual or perceived characteristics of the victim:
(1) Disability.
(2) Gender.
(3) Nationality.
(4) Race or ethnicity.
(5) Religion.
(6) Sexual orientation.
(7) Association with a person or group with one or more of these actual or perceived characteristics.
Which is why hate crime legislation was enacted.
they were painting “BLM”.
It was just black, against a black background.
So theirs was more appropriate, being black.
What a load of crap! :-[
“Planned Parenthood” is also named appropriately, it’s all about how you will raise your children...
So Becton is now an open supporter of an avowedly Marxist violent movement, BLM. That should go over well if the press is honest in their coverage of her and the trial.
Lawsuit for “malicious prosecution” and citing scores of cases in California, Seattle, Minneapolis, Portland, DC, NYC, etc where vandals WERE NOT PROSECUTED.
American cities are like living in a large mental institute.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.