Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Little More Than a Week Later and the WHO Is Changing Their Tune on Masks... Again
Town Hall ^ | Jun 06, 2020 11:55 AM | Beth Baumann

Posted on 06/07/2020 10:23:15 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

The World Health Organization (WHO) is now telling people across the globe to wear face masks when out in public, a stark contrast from what they said just a little more than one week ago. The organization's Director-General, Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, unveiled the change in guidance during a press conference on Friday.

"In areas with widespread transmission, WHO advises medical masks for all people working in clinical areas of a health facility, not only workers dealing with patients with COVID-19. That means, for example, that when a doctor is doing a ward round on the cardiology or palliative care units where there are no confirmed COVID-19 patients, they should still wear a medical mask," Tedros said. "Second, in areas with community transmission, we advise that people aged 60 years or over, or those with underlying conditions, should wear a medical mask in situations where physical distancing is not possible. Third, WHO has also updated its guidance on the use of masks by the general public in areas with community transmission."

"In light of evolving evidence, WHO advises that governments should encourage the general public to wear masks where there is widespread transmission and physical distancing is difficult, such as on public transport, in shops or in other confined or crowded environments," he said. 


(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; ghebreyesus; terrorist; who
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

1 posted on 06/07/2020 10:23:15 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

But...SCIENCE!


2 posted on 06/07/2020 10:24:11 AM PDT by 2banana (Common ground with islamic terrorists-they want to die for allah and we want to arrange the meeting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

They keep saying “follow the science,” but the science has more moves than a shifty tailback.


3 posted on 06/07/2020 10:26:10 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The running dog chicom stooge speaks. Probably trying to drum up business for the chicoms now that they’ve cornered the PPE market.


4 posted on 06/07/2020 10:26:52 AM PDT by Ceebass (A man riding by on a galloping horse wouldn't notice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

wear masks!! no don’t!! wear masks!! no don’t!! wear masks!! no don’t!!

I make it easy. I just don’t.

Haven’t been denied entrance to anywhere yet even in the Soviet satellite NYC.

I’ve been in Manhattan, Brooklyn and of course my home Staten Island and have not been bothered.

Maybe they go after old people and kids :)


5 posted on 06/07/2020 10:27:22 AM PDT by dp0622 (The very future of the Republic is at stake. We now know dems will do ANYTHING to win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Over it. 😷😭😕 No mo masks.
6 posted on 06/07/2020 10:31:05 AM PDT by rktman ( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

[[we advise that people aged 60 years or over, or those with underlying conditions, should wear a medical mask in situations where physical distancing is not possible.]]

Sounds like they are telling older folks to wear the masks to protect themselves- last i knew the WHO said masks don’t protect the wearer-


7 posted on 06/07/2020 10:33:26 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

they don’t work? good read.

https://www.oralhealthgroup.com/features/face-masks-dont-work-revealing-review/

Introduction
The above quotation is ascribed to Justice Archie Campbell author of Canada’s SARS Commission Final Report. 1 It is a stark reminder that scientific knowledge is constantly changing as new discoveries contradict established beliefs. For at least three decades a face mask has been deemed an essential component of the personal protective equipment worn by dental personnel. A current article, “Face Mask Performance: Are You Protected” gives the impression that masks are capable of providing an acceptable level of protection from airborne pathogens. 2 Studies of recent diseases such as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), Middle Eastern Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) and the Ebola Crisis combined with those of seasonal influenza and drug resistant tuberculosis have promoted a better understanding of how respiratory diseases are transmitted. Concurrently, with this appreciation, there have been a number of clinical investigations into the efficacy of protective devices such as face masks. This article will describe how the findings of such studies lead to a rethinking of the benefits of wearing a mask during the practice of dentistry. It will begin by describing new concepts relating to infection control especially personal protective equipment (PPE).

Conclusions
The primary reason for mandating the wearing of face masks is to protect dental personnel from airborne pathogens. This review has established that face masks are incapable of providing such a level of protection. Unless the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, national and provincial dental associations and regulatory agencies publically admit this fact, they will be guilty of perpetuating a myth which will be a disservice to the dental profession and its patients. It would be beneficial if, as a consequence of the review, all present infection control recommendations were subjected to the same rigorous testing as any new clinical intervention. Professional associations and governing bodies must ensure the clinical efficacy of quality improvement procedures prior to them being mandated. It is heartening to know that such a trend is gaining a momentum which might reveal the inadequacies of other long held dental infection control assumptions. Surely, the hallmark of a mature profession is one which permits new evidence to trump established beliefs. In 1910, Dr. C. Chapin, a public health pioneer, summarized this idea by stating, “We should not be ashamed to change our methods; rather, we should be ashamed not to do so.” 36 Until this occurs, as this review has revealed, dentists have nothing to fear by unmasking. OH


8 posted on 06/07/2020 10:33:36 AM PDT by huldah1776 ( Vote Pro-life! Allow God to bless America before He avenges the death of the innocent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
> WHO Is Changing Their Tune on Masks... Again <

Let’s all give WHO a break here. They are simply reporting the result of the latest spin on the mask wheel.


9 posted on 06/07/2020 10:36:52 AM PDT by Leaning Right (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

“But...SCIENCE!”

They are blinding us with it.


10 posted on 06/07/2020 10:38:03 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Work issued us cloth masks. I joke with some of my customers that I wear the mask so that I don’t scare little kids and old ladies. Reality is, as many of my customers are dialysis patients and are more prone to the CCP-Coronavirus, I wear a mask in hopes that it helps protect them from the virus.

AFA what the CCP/WHO says, I lean toward believing that they simple CANNOT, ot WILL NOT tell the truth. When they DO speak the truth, I believe that it is purely an error on their part.


11 posted on 06/07/2020 10:38:17 AM PDT by A Formerly Proud Canadian (I once was blind but now I see...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Makes it easier to identify those who are nomcompliant with State orders

If going maskless, you might have wear a BLM shirt as a form of immunity from social attack


12 posted on 06/07/2020 10:51:13 AM PDT by silverleaf (Great Things Never Come from Comfort Zones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Here in NYS it is still the sacrament of Covidism.

Hubs and I went into Lowes the other day sans masks. Most of the other sheeple were wearing them. An old hippie went by in a grocery cart rascal and said under his breath but audible to me: “Looks like somebody forgot their masks” as he slowly motored by.
I turned and said “we didn’t forget them; we’re not wearing them.”
He ignored me. Makes it easy to see how the third reich made huge inroads with the mask police on patrol.

Good thing hubs didn’t hear him. Hubs has a short fuse especially when it comes to Leftists.


13 posted on 06/07/2020 10:56:28 AM PDT by AbolishCSEU (Amount of "child" support paid is inversely proportionate to mother's actual parenting of children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

#gaslightingRus


14 posted on 06/07/2020 10:56:52 AM PDT by AbolishCSEU (Amount of "child" support paid is inversely proportionate to mother's actual parenting of children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
I have a friend who works for the Bureau of Land Management. Maybe he can get me a t-shirt. 😆
15 posted on 06/07/2020 10:57:12 AM PDT by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum; dp0622

I live in one of the free states where the virus really isn’t prevalent. Over the past year, I’ve left the mainline and started attending a younger non-denominational church. They’ve been holding in person services (suggest but do not require masks) for a few weeks but today was the first I’ve attended since March. At the second of three services this AM, it was about 30-40% of capacity because of spacing and not a single mask to be seen anywhere. Was actually a little surprised but then saw a woman in a convertible going through the Starbucks drive through with one on. Its currently ninety one degrees with a steady 30 mph wind...


16 posted on 06/07/2020 10:59:58 AM PDT by philled (If this creature is not stopped it could make its way to Novosibirsk!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Wait a minute. The Who said, "Masks? What masks? We don't have masks. WE DON GOTTA SHOW YOU NO STINKING MASKS!!!"

17 posted on 06/07/2020 11:06:27 AM PDT by Jim W N (MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

They change their science more often than they change their underwear


18 posted on 06/07/2020 11:07:39 AM PDT by nhbob1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

There are no Coincidences:

Event 201 A high level pandemic exercise on October 18, 2019

https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/about

Ouch->

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg school of Public Health Center for Health Security
World Economic Forum
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/videos.html

Highlights Reel

Videos of Event 201

Segment 2 - Trade & Travel Discussion

Segment 3 - Finance Discussion

Segment 4 - Communications Discussion and Epilogue Video

Segment 5 - Hotwash and Conclusion

FR Comments: https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3831899/posts
FR Comments: https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3838666/posts


Note date: of meetings at the Johns Hopkins “what if” forum.

October 18, 2019

Look at the lists of sponsors and the participants. Look at the videos. Was this the dress rehearsal for Covid19 Pandemic?

Think about the mask issue? Is it being used to protect demonstrators during the current riots?

None of this happened in a vacuum.


19 posted on 06/07/2020 11:08:22 AM PDT by Texas Fossil ((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Now that the rioting is over back to the whuhan flu! Next up, Russia, Russia, Russia.


20 posted on 06/07/2020 11:14:46 AM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson