Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Misleading Arithmetic of COVID-19 Death Rates
Cato ^ | 3.2.2020 | Alan Reynolds

Posted on 03/10/2020 3:12:54 AM PDT by narses

Assuming the number of people who have reportedly died from COVID-19 is reasonably accurate, then the percentage of infected people who die from the disease (the death rate) must surely have been much lower than the 2–3% estimates commonly reported. That is because the number of infected people is much larger than the number tested and reported.

The triangle graph, from a February 10 study from Imperial College London, shows that most people infected by COVID-19 are never counted as being infected. That is because, the Imperial College study explains, “the bottom of the pyramid represents the likely largest population of those infected with either mild, non‐​specific symptoms or who are asymptomatic.”

COVID-19 Cases

As the Director General of the World Health Organization (WHO), Tedros Adhanom, explained in his February 28 briefing, “Most people will have mild disease and get better without needing any special care.” Several studies have found that about 80% of all the COVID-19 cases have relatively minor symptoms which end without severe illness and therefore remain unreported.

A Chinese study in the Journal of the American Medical Association, February 20, found a “case‐​fatality rate” of 2.3%, meaning 1,023 died out of 44,672 cases. But the total sample in that study (72,314) included an additional 27,642 non‐​confirmed cases, and simply including cases (let alone unreported minor cases) would have reduced the fatality rate to 1.4%. China‐​based estimates are largely confined to cases with the most severe symptoms, so it should be no surprise that the reported death rate among severe cases is much higher than it would be if the data also included “most people” who “have a mild disease and get better.” The risk of infecting more people is also more severe in China data, since severe cases are concentrated and transmitted in hospitals. This can also lead to overstated estimates of how many people are infected by someone with COVID-19, including the WHO “reproduction number” estimate of 1.4–2.5, which is mainly based on evidence from China.

As the graph indicates, other countries include more non‐​severe cases than China does, notably by testing incoming travelers who arrive with a cough and fever. Even after casting a slightly wider net, however, the number of confirmed cases probably captures only about 30% of the actual number.

By the morning of March 2, there had been 89,253 confirmed cases of COVID-19 reported around the world, with about 96% of those in Asia. For comparison, the were an estimated 37.9 million people living with HIV in 2018.

It is worth noting that have also been 45,393 known recoveries from COVID-19 (compared to 3048 cumulative deaths) and, importantly, recoveries have been outnumbering new cases.

What about the relatively small number of COVID-19 cases outside China? In his February 28, the Director General of WHO reported that “Outside China, there are now 4351 cases in 49 countries, and 67 deaths.” Deaths of 67 divided by 4351 seems to demonstrate a death rate of 1.5%. But such calculations are highly misleading. They assume the denominator of that ratio (4351) is as accurate as the numerator (67). Yet people with “mild cases who get better” are unlikely to ever be included in the denominator.

If the WHO estimate of 4351 confirmed cases amounted to 30% of the actual number infected outside of China at that time, for example, then the combined total of both unreported and confirmed cases would be 4351 divided by 0.30 or 14,503. In that case, the actual death rate would 67 divided by 14,503, or less than one half of one percent (0.46%). Also, such death rates in the recent past are likely to come down over time, because they happened before promising new clinical trials of antiviral drugs that proved effective against more deadly viruses such as SARS, HIV and Ebola.

For perspective, the SARS coronavirus killed 774 people out of 8096 known cases in 2003, which was a death rate of 9.6% before it vanished the next year. Bird flu in 1997 was predicted to be a deadly pandemic, but it killed very few people before it disappeared. In its February 22 U.S. Influenza Surveillance Report, “CDC estimates that so far this season there have been at least 32 million flu illnesses… and 18,000 deaths from flu.” Dividing 18,000 by 32 million implies a low U.S. death rate of .0138% from the flu. Looking at the death rate alone is obviously not enough: We also have to look at the numbers of people infected, and the duration of the epidemic, which is why the flu killed so many more people than SARS. Still, it is important to avoid scaring people about the risk of death from COVID-19 by continuing to ignore the fact that the vast majority of cases “have mild disease and get better without needing any special care.”


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: coronavirus; covid19; sars; statistics; stats; usatestingfail; wuhan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: narses
It's not the death rate that worries governments. That is what it is and there's not much that can be done about it.

What's worrisome is the HOSPITALIZATION rate. As we've seen in every single country so far health care systems cannot handle the amount of critically ill that results from the virus.

That's why all governments are expending so much time and money to slow or stop it.

21 posted on 03/10/2020 6:34:06 AM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JPJones

So this article seems to be saying that if you take the cases known to be the coronavirus, and you add to them a nearly like number which may or may not be the coronavirus, then the death rate goes down.

Well, Duh.

Of course that doesn’t tell you a lot about the coronavirus, or the effects of the coronavirus.

If the effects of quarantine captured all of those reported with coronavirus, along with all of the cases of unreported coronavirus, then that would account for the lack of new cases. If there were a sizable number of cases not quarantined, then the number of new cases would still be rapidly expanding.

China is reporting only about 350 new cases since 3/4, and about 125 new deaths (which are more likely mostly out of the “still sick” pool).


22 posted on 03/10/2020 11:19:01 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: narses

So....we are not all going to die?


23 posted on 03/10/2020 11:28:59 AM PDT by going hot (happiness is a momma deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: going hot

Wrong, I am pretty sure we all will, just not all at the same time from the WooHoo Flu. No matter what the fear mongers tell you.


24 posted on 03/10/2020 1:32:54 PM PDT by narses (Censeo praedatorium gregem esse delendum. (The gay lobby must be destroyed))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

According to this website: https://gisanddata.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/bda7594740fd40299423467b48e9ecf6
the current number of COVID-19 deaths are just over 4,000 and the current number recovered are just under 70,000. That’s about a 6% death rate for currently “resolved” cases.

More importantly is how COVID-19 affected China. China has been under martial law for many weeks. The cellphone videos I’ve seen of Beijing look like they’re scenes from the Omega Man.

There’s also their rush to build new hospitals and, the shortages of body bags and, of course, no funerals in Wuhan due to contagion concerns but the crematoria are running 24/7.

I don’t know if this info is getting in the MSM but it’s been leaked from China and is being posted on youtube.


25 posted on 03/10/2020 2:19:04 PM PDT by Prolixus (In all seriousness:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: PGalt; Liz; HarleyLady27; V K Lee

Free hockey stick night at oldtimers hockey game at Michael Mann Arena...

* * *

Thanks, PGalt, for giving me a good laugh this morning!


26 posted on 03/11/2020 5:42:02 AM PDT by poconopundit (Joe Biden has long been the Senate's court jester. He's 24/7 malarkey and more corrupt than Hunter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: poconopundit; PGalt

Great post, PGalt.


27 posted on 03/11/2020 5:45:21 AM PDT by Liz (Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use. So O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: narses

28 posted on 05/09/2020 3:32:54 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: narses

Old article. But relevant. Our statistics are not counting mild cases. I believe that at least 200 million Americans will get infected before 5h4 crisis ends.


29 posted on 05/09/2020 3:34:19 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson