Posted on 02/10/2020 11:40:15 AM PST by BlueHorseShoe
What’s the link?
Why does he need to produce and promote his own you-tube channel regarding evidence rather than hand it off to Durham/Barr/DoJ? It doesnt (or shouldnt) take a congressional/senate investigation to report illegal activity and start an investigation.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
It’s a deep (state) rabbit hole ....
This may be enlightening:
Lindsey Graham Outlines Deep State Defense Ukraine Corruption is Likely Russian Propaganda
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/02/09/lindsey-graham-outlines-deep-state-defense-ukraine-corruption-is-likely-russian-propaganda/
Today we get the outline of the DC Deep State defense strategy within a CBS interview of Senator Lindsey Graham. Within the interview Graham notes he talked to Senate Intelligence Chairman Richard Burr and U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr about documents Rudy Giuliani has recovered from Ukraine outlining Biden corruption.
First, SSCI Chairman Richard Burr was a participant in the coup effort; and is an ongoing member of the cover-up; so why would anyone direct anything to Richard Burr and Vice-Chair Mark Warner? . Unless cover-up was the intent. Beyond sketchy.
Additionally, Senator Graham conveys that he has spoken to AG Barr who has cautioned Graham that Giulianis information could be Russian propaganda. How convenient.
Bannon is a fascinating character to me. He is so darn intelligent. He is such a huge Trump supporter and Im sure hes just laughing at all the angst when he left the White House because hes always been proTrump.
Bannon was on Bill Mahers show last week and he wiped the floor with Maher. I saw a clip on Twitter.
Bannons interviews are by far among the most interesting I hear. He has been on with Maria Bartiromo on her Sunday Morning Futures a couple times recently. He was on with Jesse Watters over the weekend and I have to go watch that.
Bannon has inside info on Trumps personality I find so interesting. Like the other day he talked about the SOTU speech and he was chuckling about how Trump walked into that chamber with that huge serious game face. He said Pelosi just doesnt understand that and how determined the man is and she vastly underestimates him. He said when you see that face he means business!
The question is "did any of these actions break the law" and if so, the person we need to do something is Barr, not Lindsey.
Maybe this falls withing Durham's "predicate" investigation, but not really. This is a different time frame. It's Ukraine, it's not Russia. It's after the campaign time frame.
Time for a *Special Counsel* !!
Bill Barr just came out and said they’re reviewing Guiliani’s info
Not true, Ukrainian is the official language of Ukraine and in all government offices.
Poroshenko owned chocolates not media and when he ran for re-election he was overwhelmingly defeated.
With the DNC Media here; that would never happen.
President Zelensky is doing his best with the Russian Bear encroaching in the east.
Given the number of entities out there who would love to see POTUS have an embarrassing misstep, is that bad advice?
No, but not hard to find it.
Yes, what I am reporting here from Rudy today, is Eric Ciaramella planned from the beginning starting in a meeting JANUARY 2016 to stop Trumps election and after the election to continue to start a coup to overthrow him.
He asked Ukraine to dig up dirt on the Trump campaign mainly starting with Manafort.
Wasnt Trump just impeached for Democrats accusing him of that very thing?
There is unlawful activity from the very beginning by Ciaramella and others involved. Rudy does have the goods. No worries on that count. It will all come out no matter if people here and beyond wish to believe it. Trump is too damn smart for it not to and he vows this will never happened again to a US president.
I agree Bannon is very sharp and he has been at least putatively out there pushing the pro-Trump line since he was booted.
But there have also been rumors that some former Trump admin characters were allowed to skate if they kept up the pro-Trump message. (Hello, Seb Gorka?)
Bannon was Navy intel and Goldman and made his millions one way or another, with Seinfeld as a convenient cover.
I suspect he’s got some major skeletons and he may have been up to some ulterior motives with his time in the Trump campaign and admin. Of course, no proof.
It is pure cover-up.
Listen to this scumbag here:
Ok, I saw the video. There is a vetting process and Barr is having Rudy’s input go through that process. So? Where do you derive coverup and scumbag from that?
Ok, so I was posting here and I am just now resuming this podcast. Bannon is talking about Lindsey Graham who talked to Catherine Herridge after this show and Rudys Tweet. Again, Bannon just called it a bombshell!
Her tweet:
SCOOP: @LindseyGrahamSC tells CBS News that he plans to deliver his FISA witness list to DOJ as early as this week. Graham says he is moving methodically adding he hopes to begin private depositions, and public hearings end of the month, early March #FISA #Durham
Now, what Miller just said is missing from this from Graham is no mention of whistleblower, whistleblower #2 who disappeared, Adam Schiff, Hunter Biden and Joe Biden. Getting to the bottom of this for where it truly started!
They called what we heard from Giuliani today is EXPLOSIVE! And all this needs to happen from the Judiciary Committee.
Someone has a very firm grip on Graham’s nuts. It would be interesting to know what and whom.
Wasnt Trump just impeached for Democrats accusing him of that very thing?
The Democrats are the party of projection. Anything they accuse the GOP of doing, you know they are doing it themselves.
So, there are three possibilities, as I see it.
One: this junior CIA agent, billeted to the NSC, decided to do this (investigate Biden, try to create a scandal around Trump and Ukraine) - going back to 2016. And he did it all on his own.
Two: He was working at under the direction of someone (or multiple someones) and the plan came from higher up.
He should be put under oath and made to explain which it is. But if that looks likely or certain then option number three becomes more likely:
Three: he dies in a tragic accident in Arkansas in the next few weeks.
Btw, this meeting was held in the White House. The one they refer to in January 2016. There is just so much info in this podcast it is a MUST LISTEN. I cant type it all here.
Yes, we must hear from the whistleblower and others as I just posted in #134.
Barr is just playing the cautious adult to avoid getting into the “bombshell” press release game with the press. He talks softly but carries a big stick. I don’t know how there can be any question that Biden confessed to bribery unless the Russians created the CFR tape. The money laundering evidence regarding the payments to Hunter Biden are also from Latvian banking officials and have been reviewed by the USDOS since they demanded the amounts for Hunter and Devon Archer be redacted from the original document. It was only by corroborating this document with Devon Archer’s bank records from his criminal trial that the amounts became known. The testimony from Shokin corroborates Biden’s own statement about his firing.
The real smoking guns are the telephone recordings or transcripts that took place between Biden and Poroshenko just prior to the demand to fire Shokin in 2015. If Biden discusses knowledge of Burisma or the prosecutor investigation on any of these calls it is the “nail in the coffin” to his being charged with bribery. This should be the first evidence that Barr/Durham demands from the State Department.
This just posted:
AG Bill Barr Addresses Rudy Giuliani Investigative Material on Ukraine
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/02/10/ag-bill-barr-addresses-rudy-giuliani-investigative-material-on-ukraine/#more-183218
I don’t have a problem with what Barr is saying as long as the DOJ takes a serious look at what Rudy has & doesn’t “shrug it off” which is what some people have described to Rudy has happened when trying to turn over info, that Rudy now has, to the FBI - vet it well, if it needs debunking, then do that, too. With the last 3 years under our belts, if ‘actions speak louder than words’ as far as the DOJ/FBI are concerned, I don’t expect much to happen.
Thats my impression as well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.