Posted on 02/03/2020 8:59:04 AM PST by jazusamo
(Washington, DC) Judicial Watch announced that eight Iowa counties have more voter registrations than their eligible voting-age population. According to Judicial Watchs analysis of data released by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) in 2019 and the most recent U.S. Census Bureaus five-year American Community Survey, eight Iowa counties are on the list of 378 counties nationwide that have more voter registrations than citizens living there who are old enough to vote, i.e., counties where registration rates exceed 100%. These 378 counties combined had about 2.5 million registrations over the 100%-registered mark. In Iowa, there are at least 18,658 extra names on the voting rolls in the eight counties at issue.
Under the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 ( NVRA ), Judicial Watch sent notice-of-violation letters to 19 large counties in five states (California, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Virginia, and Colorado) that it intends to sue unless the jurisdictions take steps to comply with the law and remove ineligible voter registrations. Section 8 of the National Voter Registration Act requires jurisdictions to take reasonable efforts to remove ineligible registrations from its rolls.
The chart below details the eight Iowa counties registration rate percentages:
Reg Rate | Total Population | |
Dallas County | 114.8 | 80,864 |
Johnson County | 107.9 | 114,425 |
Lyon County | 102.5 | 11,475 |
Madison County | 102.5 | 15,720 |
Poweshiek County | 102.1 | 18,428 |
Dickinson County | 100.9 | 17,000 |
Scott County | 100.8 | 171,493 |
Warren County | 100.5 | 48,630 |
In addition to the eight listed above, Polk County, Iowas largest, has an unusually high registration rate of 95.9% of total eligible citizen voting-age population.Dirty voting rolls can mean dirty elections and Iowa need to undertake a serious effort to address its voting rolls, said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.Judicial Watch is the national leader in enforcing the National Voters Registration Act, which requires states to take reasonable steps to clean their voting rolls.In 2018, the Supreme Court upheld a massive voter roll clean up that resulted from a Judicial Watch settlement of a federal lawsuit with Ohio.California also settled a similar lawsuit with Judicial Watch that last year began the process of removing up to 1.5 million inactive names from Los Angeles County voting rolls. Kentucky also began a cleanup of up to 250,00 names last year after it entered into a consent decree to end another Judicial Watch lawsuit.Judicial Watch Attorney Robert Popper is the director of Judicial Watchs Election Integrity initiative.
###
If there are some 60,000 students in Iowa alone, cycling through ever 4 years or so (60,000/4 = 15,000 per year), how come so many of them wind up climate-clinger SJWs voting D-column? And do they eat beef, or only corn?
But cleaning up voter rolls is disenfranchising voters.....
somehow
in liberalland.
Republican: "This voter roll says that Mr. Mick E. Mouse, residing at #0 Nowhere Lane is a registered Democrat and has been voting consistently since 1928. I'm going to remove this. It's bogus."
Democrat: "Oh, that's just great! You disenfranchised Mr. Mouse! You racist!!"
It’s fast becoming obvious that the DIMocRATS Party is now so INCOMPETENT that they cannot even FIX a party caucus in a small Midwestern State anymore.
The DIMs (as in NOT smart) are headed for a BLOODBATH on 03NOV20. - The Electoral College vote will not even be as close as the 2016 count was.
Yours, TMN78247
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.