Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Schumer warns of reckoning for Republican senators who vote against witnesses in impeachment trial
MarketWatch ^ | January 31, 2020 | By Victor Reklaitis

Posted on 01/31/2020 9:12:39 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and other top Democrats on Friday slammed an upcoming vote that looks set to result in a quick end to President Donald Trump’s impeachment trial.

The New York lawmaker was responding to Republican Sen. Lamar Alexander’s announcement on Thursday night that he would not vote Friday to hear witnesses in the Senate trial.

“It’s deeply disturbing that on something of such importance to the future of our democracy, a few of my Republican colleagues announced last night they’d vote against hearing additional evidence,” Schumer said at a news conference.

“It’s clear where the American people stand on the issue. Republican senators who decide to go against the will of the people will have to reckon with it.”

On Friday, Schumer aimed to portray the trial as bogus unless it involves witnesses such as John Bolton, the former national security adviser.

“If my Republican colleagues refuse to consider witnesses and documents in this trial, the president’s acquittal will be meaningless, because it will be the result of a sham trial,” the New York Democrat said.

(Excerpt) Read more at marketwatch.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cuckschemer; election2020; impeachment; intimidation; mafiatactics; threats; thugs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

1 posted on 01/31/2020 9:12:39 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Cuck Schemer strikes out again.


2 posted on 01/31/2020 9:13:33 AM PST by kiryandil (Chris Wallace: Because someone has to drive the Clown Car)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Yeah, I reckon they’ll get re-elected handily.


3 posted on 01/31/2020 9:14:08 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

But, did he wag his finger when he said it?


4 posted on 01/31/2020 9:14:36 AM PST by WakeUpAndVote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

awwwwwwwwwwwwwww poor Schmucky, hey here’s an idea Schumer, how about your party actually try to be NORMAL for once, bring forth good ideas to help this country, instead of communism, maybe your party would have a chance to win legit..but you cant, your party is overrun with commies so the ONLY way to actually win is by taking it by force


5 posted on 01/31/2020 9:15:11 AM PST by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Republicans have no concrn whatsoever against this threat because the Dems will do just what they do anyway.


6 posted on 01/31/2020 9:16:07 AM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

7 posted on 01/31/2020 9:17:14 AM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I hope John Bolton enjoys his new friends.


8 posted on 01/31/2020 9:18:14 AM PST by Repealthe17thAmendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Yeh, Chuck U Schumer


9 posted on 01/31/2020 9:18:17 AM PST by Godzilla ( I just love the smell of COVFEFE in the morning . . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Heads on pikes?


10 posted on 01/31/2020 9:18:33 AM PST by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

11 posted on 01/31/2020 9:20:01 AM PST by kiryandil (Chris Wallace: Because someone has to drive the Clown Car)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WakeUpAndVote

“ But, did he wag his finger when he said it?”

If not I’m sure he at least looked at them condescendingly over those stupid readers he always wears.


12 posted on 01/31/2020 9:20:32 AM PST by bk1000 (Banned from Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WakeUpAndVote

I would say it will be just the opposite Schumer, you IDIOTS have no idea what the hell is going on out in America go ahead and live in your bubble AND then cry when the house is gone and the senate GAINS seats!!! Have you even taken the time to LOOK at his rallies YOU MORON!!!


13 posted on 01/31/2020 9:21:38 AM PST by Trump Girl Kit Cat (Yosemite Sam raising hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: caww

Even if they allowed witnesses, the Democrats would find some other aspects of the procedure to bitch about, and proclaim that the Senate trial was a sham.

Ironies abound, as so many of us considered the House impeachment process to have been a sham job.

The evolving liberal view, as espoused by Pelosi and others, is that the Senate trial has not been conducted properly, and because of that, the resulting acquittal of Trump will be improper.


14 posted on 01/31/2020 9:22:26 AM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

the president’s acquittal will be meaningless, because it will be the result of a sham trial,”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Rather fitting for a sham impeachment.

#Seinfeld impeachment


15 posted on 01/31/2020 9:23:27 AM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizens Are Born Here of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Says the guy who enables the “six ways to Sunday”, seditious, maniacal, intelligence communities by refusing to exercise oversight.


16 posted on 01/31/2020 9:23:30 AM PST by blackdog (Making wine cave appearances upon request.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

He is half right; it is bogus. Mostly due to the House not allowing cross-examination, not hearing from the whistle faker, holding everything contrary in secret, and not having any crimes in their articles.


17 posted on 01/31/2020 9:23:52 AM PST by Ingtar (Bedbugs, thy name is Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Sure - because the Democrats weren’t going to run opponents against the Republicans who voted for witnesses. Democrats and liberals keep offering Republicans unsolicited advice because they love the GOP and want to help it win more elections.


18 posted on 01/31/2020 9:24:20 AM PST by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“If my Republican colleagues refuse to consider witnesses and documents in this trial, the president’s acquittal will be meaningless, because it will be the result of a sham trial,”
_____________________________________________________________

Right Chuck because refusal to consider witnesses and documents is what will make it a sham.


19 posted on 01/31/2020 9:24:59 AM PST by MrHead (i know my soul is lost to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Sounds like an Ayatollah minutes before launching missiles into a pile of sand


20 posted on 01/31/2020 9:26:03 AM PST by wiseprince
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson