**DRUDGE POLL** SHOULD IMPEACHMENT TRIAL HAVE WITNESSES?

Drudge Report ^ | January 30,2020 | Dudge

[Hojczyk]

**DRUDGE POLL** SHOULD IMPEACHMENT TRIAL HAVE WITNESSES?

NO. 75%

YES. 25%

[samtheman]

First time I’ve Drudged in years, but I had to vote in this poll:

NO
75%
17,444 votes

YES
25%
5,904 votes

Poll posted 37 mins ago.
23,348 Total Votes

[DarthVader]

It irks me to go on Sludge but I did.

[romanesq]

Me neither but I clicked from the link above and it took me right to the polling page.

It was nice to contribute to the 75% “no.”

[Kozak]

LOL. Just like Chicago you can vote early and often...

[DarthVader]

+10! Me too.

[Jess Kitting]

If it does, the witness(es) should include the so-called whistle-blower, Hunter Biden, Adam Schiff.

Otherwise, it is a sham. Let's hope it doesn't turn into (more of) one (than it already is).

[Parley Baer]

I voted no. Still at 75% NO.

[NormsRevenge]

The Rat controlled House had its duty and plenty of opportunities to do its job and shouldn’t have relied on the Senate to do its job for them.

For that, the party is about to be relegated to the back benches and oblivion for decades.. and deservedly so.

[nralife]

Thanks for the tip.

[Osage Orange]

I ain’t doing it.....

[Gay State Conservative]

“No” is now 74.79%

[Leep]

Poll: Should Dudge hang it up?

[Leep]

Drudge that is.

[Antoninus]

Sorry. Will not click Drudge under any circumstances.

[dhouston]

Sludge, I love it! I think the majority of folk here have not been on Sludge very often. Google ruined them.

[JerseyRepub]

I’m not going to visit Drudge - my new year, new decade resolution. Looks like it’s been Freeped already thought....

[faithhopecharity]

First time I’ve clicked on drudge since he went bad. Worthwhile I think to give him message we are sick and tired of this fake impeachment farce and want constitutional procedure. Juries ( senate) vote on what prosecutors. (House) present. Period. Juries don’t go searching out more evidence to bail out failed prosecution cases.

[yoe]

If witnesses are allowed then Republicans call your elected's office and demand the Whistleblower and who ever else the GOP wants to be called. As of now, I believe Justice Roberts says the Whistleblower can't be called. Roberts is a political justice, not a true judge nor Constitutional Scholar.

[pnut22]

Online polls are meaningless except to be quoted on fake news. 75% of the people don’t know there are already 17 witnesses and one in Adam Schiff’s hidey hole.