Posted on 01/28/2020 6:24:34 AM PST by billorites
I guess I should say something.
For five years my office at AEI was right next to John Bolton. Lately Ive been having fun with this photo suggesting I can do hearsay with the best of Adam Schiffs witnesses (that is, making stuff up).
I cant say I got to know Bolton very well, but as early risers we were often the first people in the office before well before 7 am on many days, so Id sometimes stop to chat over coffee and wed joke about things. And he was helpful to me several times when I needed some inside information on how the UNs climate change circus worked, and also on my Reagan books. He was on the right side of a lot of important things going all the way back to the Buckley v. Valeo case in 1976. I often joked on those mornings when we arrived early that I wanted to know his Fox News schedule that day so I wouldnt get run over as he bolted (heh) out of the office for the elevator several times a day to race down to the Fox bureau on First Street for an appearance. Youd get hurt if you were in his path!
I have a high opinion of Bolton. I may revise this later, but for the moment, Ill stand with my prior judgment. We should take the media reports just now with a large lump of salt. It is entirely possible that Bolton, if he testifies in the Senate, will say that Trump legitimately believed that Ukraine was a center of election interference in 2016, and that Biden was involved in it, which would turn the tables on the Democrats, as it would make the conditions of the aid wholly legitimate. Scott Adams thinks this might be the case. (Im hoping to do a separate post on how the Lin Manuel Miranda musical about the Trump impeachment might go, since the title of Boltons book borrows from one of the hit songs from HamiltonThe Room Where It Happened. Something like, The Senate Floor Where It Didnt Happen.)
It is also true that Bolton is a very ambitious person. Political ambition is an ambiguous thing, so it is not necessarily a knock to say someone is ambitious. I discount heavily (though not entirely) that the leak of his forthcoming book is meant to juice sales. I respect and admire political ambition, though it is hard to draw the line between worthy ambition and selfish ambition. That line is in fact impossible to draw: see, e.g, Charles de Gaulle. I do not just now incline to believe that Bolton or his publisher is necessarily behind the leak to the NY Times. There are lots of possibilities here. The fact that the Times is the venue for the leak ought to make everyone suspicious. Im pretty sure Bolton hates the Times as much as every other decent person, though that doesnt preclude using them for your own purposes at the right moment.
One old moment does come back to mind. I used to clash frequently with Arthur Brooks after he became president of AEI. In fact, it was the shouting match I had with Arthur after he dismissed Roger Scruton from AEI in 2012 (without asking anyones opinion about his decisionhow totally clueless do you have to be to fire ROGER SCRUTON!!!) that precipitated my unhappy departure from AEI that year. But its one of my earlier disputes with Arthur from the spring of 2011 that came back to mind today, when I apologized for being such a pain in the ass to Arthur amidst the stresses and strains of his job, and Arthur generously waved it off: Oh heck, your complaints are nothing compared to what I get from John Bolton! I didnt ask for details at the time, but it does make me wonder. Im withholding final judgment for the time being. I do note, however, that since leaving the White House Bolton hasnt returned to AEI.
Meanwhile, Im having a much harder time retaining any residual respect for Mitt Romney. Isnt it more than a little bit conveeeenient that the Bolton book leak should occur exactly when it does the most damage to Trump in the Senate impeachment proceedings? This is not an accident, and Romney (and Collins, Murkowski, and Alexander) ought to understand this. It is a rerun of the Kavanaugh ambush. And the Clarence Thomas ambush in 1991. The Democrats playbook is more stale than a playbook from George Halas in 1965. If Romney really thought Bolton was a relevant witness, the time to say this was three or four weeks ago at least. Now he reveals himself to be the monkey to the NY Times organ grinder.
This is a perfect moment for a character sketch in politics. Mitt Romney is a decent and good man, just like his equally decent but clueless father, whose politically weak character Nixon judged exactly right (that is, contemptuously). Id have Mitt babysit my kids, and structure a major business investment for me. Trump is a bit of a rogue; not sure Id want him babysitting my kids, and I wouldnt do business with him. But Trump gets it when it comes to politics. He knows who the bad guys are. Romney doesnt. Romney is the kind of person who looks to make nice with the cannibals after they have him trussed up in the pot and have the wood fire lit underneath. Of course Trumps behavior in the Ukraine matter is less than perfect (though you really do have to admire Trumps instinctually correct moxie in calling it a perfect phone call), but Romney and other weak-minded GOP senators cant recognize what is really going on.
Let me restate this last paragraph: Romneys highest and best use is babysitting kids. Trumps best use is smashmouth rugby with Democrats. This is not a hard call.
Mitt Romney is a decent and good man”
nope
Romney is the kind of person who looks to make nice with the cannibals after they have him trussed up in the pot and have the wood fire lit underneath.”
nope. ask jon huntsman if romney looks to make nice
[Mitt Romney is a decent and good man]
Your writing takes up a lot space to say nothing. Is that by a plan of yours.
Someone out there in Free Republic land ought to start a
Trump Wildwood, New Jersey rally posting, like right now, because this rally in New Jersey is going to one for the history books!!! Add photos...too, as the day goes by!!! Do it...now!!!
“Let me restate this last paragraph: Romneys highest and best use is babysitting kids. Trumps best use is smashmouth rugby with Democrats. This is not a hard call.”
_______________________________________
The author didn’t think it through.
He’s already said Romney would try negotiating if he were trussed up and ready to be cooked by the cannibals.
That means Romney would react the same way while babysitting this man’s kids.
Yep. The author may have pinged Pres Trump’s instincts on the dot...he’s still waaaaaay behind the curve on trusting Romney’s babysitting his kids!!
John “Kitty Kelly” Bolton.
Spot on.
Contact Senator Romney via this link:
https://www.romney.senate.gov/contact
By Telephone
Alternatively, you may phone the United States Capitol switchboard at (202) 224-3121. A switchboard operator will connect you directly with the Senate office you request.
“Let me restate this last paragraph: Romneys highest and best use is babysitting kids. Trumps best use is smashmouth rugby with Democrats. This is not a hard call.”
This author is so clueless. Check out the below snippet:
“Id have Mitt babysit my kids, and structure a major business investment for me. Trump is a bit of a rogue; not sure Id want him babysitting my kids, and I wouldnt do business with him”.
LOL, he rather trust a politician than a businessman to structure a major business investment for him. As I said, clueless.
‘Xactly! Romney is a giant turd.
The leak was from the FBI. Everyone knows the NYT is the preferred partner for leaks from the FBI.
The leak came from Vidmans brother.
Romney is a morally bankrupt wannabe.
Mitt Romney has backstabbing in his DNA. Look up his Dad and what he did to Goldwater.
Worse, Mitt has a real problem. He has never heard a proposition of his supposed opponents with which he was not inclined to agree. He is that person who so desperately wants to belong to the cool crowd. I can picture him in school doing whatever the cool crowd was doing but overdoing it. If they were making fun of some kid for a day, he was doing it for ten. If some style of clothing was seen as cool, hed over do it.
He is just a solid loser who cant be his own person. He has to be who he thinks others want him to be. He stands for nothing but thinks he is everything.
If Bolton was an ally, all he had to do was NOT bring that book out now. Impeachment was ending until this.
He an enemy. If Republicans allow witnesses, the fix is in.
Romney is negotiating the price of betrayal. When you see him in front of the camera saying maybe, maybe not, but maybe, just understand that he is negotiating. And waiting for the right text message to tell him what to do.
I would never trust Mitt Romney to babysit my kids.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.