Posted on 01/22/2020 7:15:33 AM PST by edwinland
"Alarmed by their conversation, the military staffer immediately reported what he heard to his superiors."
I'm sure Alan Dershowitz already has a copy of that report.
If I were a conspiracy theorist, I'd say they were "tagged" with a "watch and follow" order to see who else would be exposed.
Games people play.
Illustrates why the White House staff should have been purged of holdovers from the Kenyanesian Usurpation.
As much as I believe that something like this really happened, it’s useless without corroboration.
I wonder who the military superior was? Vindman?
These folks are the ones who need to be called as witnesses, if we go down that road.
He reported it to his superior.
Just as likely the superior said, “Okay, I’ll take care of it” and chucked it in a can.
Or, he could have passed it to a civilian counterpart who said “Okay, I’ll take care of it” and chucked it in a can.
Conspiracy: A criminal conspiracy exists when two or more people agree to commit almost any unlawful act, then take some action toward its completion. The action taken need not itself be a crime, but it must indicate that those involved in the conspiracy knew of the plan and intended to break the law. A person may be convicted of conspiracy even if the actual crime was never committed.
https://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-charges/conspiracy.html
My thoughts exactly.
Subpoena is always an option and compel testimony under oath.
“Alarmed by their conversation, the military staffer immediately reported what he heard to his superiors.”
Corroboration should exist
Ergo, who will be the first person to identify the impeachment and preceding events as a criminal conspiracy to remove a duly elected president, then call material witnesses to the conspiracy? Ciaramella, this Misko guy, John Brennan, Clapper...
This might seem to be a big deal to us folks who don’t really know what the hell is actually going on. When you know what AG Barr does it all makes sense.
White House colleague who overheard their conversation... the military staffer immediately reported what he heard to his superiors.
So why is this coming out now and not back in 2017 and why didn’t the “superior’s” ring the alarm bell?
I would not doubt that they would have an audio tape of this conversation if it took place in the White House.
why have child rapists and caught-traitors and
seditionists allowed to have ANY say in this gov’t.
they should be at the end of a rope.
I’ve come to believe that were I ever elected president, which I KNOW is never ever going to happen, I’d have everyone in my appointed staff given lie detector drugs and hooked up to a polygraph and asked questions like: whom directs policy in this administration. Any waiver on the needle between the President and something else is an immediate lethal shot of fentanyl. Leaving snakes like this guy wandering around shows an naive belief that the staffs here believe in our form of government in that they will follow the legal orders of the elected leaders.
Ukraine “witness” - bump for later....
Yup, once one agrees to the plan, once an overt act is committed, like reporting false info, the whole group goes for conspiracy even if the plot never gets farther off the ground.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.