Posted on 12/15/2019 2:53:43 PM PST by jazusamo
Schiff was on Fox News Channel today interviewed by Chris Wawass.
Schiff kept saying that the FISA abuse was a real eye-opener and that he had no way of knowing what had gone on on the FBI, and he said that knowledge would have changed his position on the Russia Investigation/ Chris Wall-ass accepted everything the bug eyed slime said without question.
But thefact is tha Devon Nunes informed Schiff repeatedly about the hoax via intel committee discoveries that Nunes had made. Nunes also was one of the first to reveal the attempted coupe to the President. Schiff did indeed know two years ago that the FISA app was bad premised on the false Steele report. Nunes had informed Schiff in committee.
What did Nunes get for his trouble? An ethics complaint on Nunes , so that Nunes had to vacate the committee chair until the ethics complaint was processed, a period of about 4 months. Schiff was trying to get rid of Nunes from the Commitee for good because of what Nunes had discovered.
Two take aways:
1) Schiff is still lying about when he knew that the FBI work on Carter Page was dirty.He was lying right on television to millions about it.
2) CHRIS WALL-ASS LET SCHIFF GET AWAY WITH IT, ON PURPOSE.
WALL-ASS IS A STONE COLD SOCIALIST PRIG, NOT TO BE TRUSTED.
From now on I will view Wallace as just another CNN reporter.
If Mittens votes to impeach you can be sure he will never get TWO SCOOPS of ice cream EVER.
Maybe his survival instinct will kick in.
“MooCowSki”, Collins and Romney will pull their usual CRAP and vote with the RATS!
The Senate should vote for a trial ‘inquiry’. You know, nothing official, just a looksee. Secret testimony can be recorded. Some doesn’t really need to be released - only the cherry picked parts. It’s all been done before.
Yep, I saw that and it proves again that Schiff is a baldfaced liar.
You’re right about Wallace being a leftist socialist also.
I fear they will, and they’re too well-ensconced in their respective states to be successfully primaried.
Democrats had every opportunity to conduct impeachment proceedings in whatever manner they deemed appropriate. But House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff is now upset that Senate Republicans will be afforded the same opportunity in the Senate.
All we'll be needing for Schiff's trial is a drumhead and a rope.
“”When it comes to a vote, President Trump will not get a HOUSE vote of impreachment””
You’re dreaming. Of course, there will be enough votes in the House for impeachment. For anyone to think otherwise is dreaming and deluding themselves. Nancy already has the votes counted - she needs 216 and can get 231 according to reports. There are 246 dems in the House so I don’t know where the other 15 stand.
She could lose 10 who are leaning toward censure and still have enough. Sure hope she’s losing sleep with these numbers rattling around in that thing in her skull that passes for a brain. What if she lost more? SUPER!
I’ve heard that she wants the vote before recess for Christmas because she wouldn’t be guaranteed the 216 votes after they all return in January. Not really sure WHY that is as all the numbers are touting the public WANTS him impeached so what’s the downside for her?
If they do, that would mean a thin victory indeed, 50/50, unless some Dems cross over.
Even with the 2/3 majority requirement and the VP’s tie-breaker, the Dems will claim that Trump was let go easy on a technicality. They’ll always claim something, and who really cares. But the less they have to carry on about, the better.
The Senate should stipulate that because the witnesses called by the House were sufficient to level the charges, they must be sufficient to try the case. HOWEVER ... they should stipulate to ONLY call first hand witnesses ... oh wait that would mean the can only call Sondland who “presumed” and “guessed” and “thought he understood” way too much.
I knew that if impeachment goes to the Senate, the clarion calls from left-wing groups will descend on Washington and demand McConnell recuse himself. Already, they're attacking Barr as Trump's Frank Nitti.
I can’t shake the feeling the good ole Mitch is going to do the Republican usual, that is, play nice, play fair, cave and say we have to do this so we don’t be accused of not letting the Dems have a fair trial blah blah.
Romney will vote to impeach of that I am sure.
I believe I read that the VP can’t vote on impeachment process in the Senate as it will favor him.
It’s moot, anyway. Best case scenario for the Dems is they get a fifty-fifty vote.
But if I were Pence and I did have the tie-breaker vote, I would vote for acquittal with bells on. After all the sh!t they’ve been throwing at Trump non-stop, you couldn’t pay me enough to take his job. And he donates his annual salary, which to him is chump change. I would love to see his bust, with a long red tie hanging down, carved onto Mt. Rushmore. They’d put his ass on the other side at the foot of the hill for penitent libtards to kiss. He is as uniquely American as Mark Twain, and in his own way a great, historical POTUS.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.