I’m wondering if there’s a reason Barr is being so complimentary of Fay Wray.
Like long-game reason/something we don’t know about, yet.
‘
Christopher Wray signaled they did nothing wrong.
Nothing to see here.
Maintain Political Power in FBi.
‘
Heads are exploding at NBC that they broadcast this’
ping
The only must watch is Comey and the gang being frogmarched. All that fat bag piper does is talk in stead of doing his %$^% job. See tagline.
Thanks for posting.
Ignore the trolls :-)
Save for later
I don’t often agree with must see claims, but this sure is!
I hope as many people as possible see this full interview
Let's see if Barr's actions match his words - but he sounds like a smart, powerful, humble man who really means what he says.
I think Durham is a head-hunter and on the case for a reason.
pfl
Durham ivestigqtion could take many months. Depends upon how deep the rabbit hole goes.
After seeing this video, I believe we WILL see indictments. How many and who are my only questions.
Barr report late spring, early summer?
Very interesting interview.
His comments on the limited scope and information and rules of the Horowitz investigation are spot on.
His comments on not taking any shortcuts in the Durham investigation are also correct.
If you are going to indict a former President you need to be make sure everything is exactly perfect.
“must watch, very encouraging (except for the Wray comment)”
No results until late Spring, early Summer? That’s not encouraging.
George P. met with Joseph Mifsud in April, 2016. Mifsud brought up the topic of Russians having “dirt” on Hillary. And George said it appeared Mifsud was recording the conversation. So, that would push the start back to at least April, if not earlier.
What about the comment about there being a Durham report and that it won't be out until possibly early summer.
I don't think that's encouraging.
Rush picked up on the same phrase I mentioned yesterday, and which is part of Barr’s remark aabout the evidence standard. Horowitz said in some cases he could not find “documentary or testimonial evidence to support” a claim. That just means no one he talked to (DOJ/FBI employees) admitted it, had documents proving it, or were willing to testify about someone else doing it. In other words, existing employees did not wish to play “you bet your pension” to rat someone out.
Completely different rules apply to Durham’s investigation and any others that may occur.
When no one confesses to stealing Little Johnny’s lunch money, the Principal gets involved.
So fire Horowitz and Wray, and start arresting the coup plotters and criminals already.
Thanks for posting but I don’t find it encouraging. The substance here is Barr let Horowitz slow walk the whitewash for nearly a year. If Barr really feels as he says he does why did he allow that?
I am way past caring about beltway gum flapping. It’s almost entirely gaslighting, unfortunately. The proof is in the pudding as they say. That’s all that matters at this point.