Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dontreadthis

Very interesting interview.

His comments on the limited scope and information and rules of the Horowitz investigation are spot on.

His comments on not taking any shortcuts in the Durham investigation are also correct.

If you are going to indict a former President you need to be make sure everything is exactly perfect.


27 posted on 12/10/2019 2:09:04 PM PST by The Free Engineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: The Free Engineer

“His comments on not taking any shortcuts in the Durham investigation are also correct.”

Respectfully disagree. Call witnesses before a Grand Jury. Make them hire expensive lawyers. You need to put the pressure on witnesses to get them to turn on the others. The only way to get to the bottom is to get at least one, if not more, people to flip.

The longer they take, and get into campaign season, the more political it’s going to look.

Worst case scenario, Trump loses the election, and then we find out there was a conspiracy against him in 2016.

BTW, there is no question in my mind, the Dems are more than prepared to fix the 2020 election. Ballot harvesting is a tried and effective method.


36 posted on 12/10/2019 2:17:04 PM PST by euclid216
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson