Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Civil rights groups demand changes to Facebook's political speech policy
The Hill ^ | 11 14 2019 | Chris Mills Rodrigo

Posted on 11/14/2019 10:08:05 AM PST by yesthatjallen

A coalition of civil rights groups are demanding that Facebook overhaul its political speech policy, according to a letter obtained by The Hill Thursday.

The letter, dated Friday, followed up on a meeting between Mark Zuckerberg and the leaders of the groups — including the NAACP, Color of Change and National Action Network — at the Facebook CEO’s home earlier this month.

The organizations, which also include Muslim Advocates, UnidosUS and the National Urban League, are asking for a response from Facebook by Nov. 25.

Among the requests made in the letter is putting “guardrails on the newsworthiness exemption,” referring to Facebook’s community guideline allowing content from political figures to stay up even if it breaks some of the social media platform’s policies.

“As we made clear in our discussion, politicians are, and historically have been, key perpetrators of rhetoric that incites racial, religious, and anti-immigrant violence and voter suppression in our nation,” the groups wrote.

“The politician exemption and newsworthiness exemption are deeply connected to issues of voter and census suppression and should be reformed accordingly.”

The civil rights groups also called on Facebook to subject political ads to third-party fact-checking.

Facebook has come under intense scrutiny for its policy, launched in October, not to fact-check or block advertisements from politicians over false or misleading claims. The social media giant has defended the policy, saying it is not the place of private companies to police political speech.

The groups asked that posts found to contain such claims be demoted to “reduce the virality of misinformation.”

SNIP

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: civilrights; facebook; freespeech; internet; socialmedia; technotyranny; zuckerberg
The 'progressive' liberal Democrat attack on Facebook continues.

“All constituents have a right to know their representative’s views,” they wrote. “Politicians and candidates should not be allowed to send different messages to different populations within their constituency without any transparency that such messaging is occurring.”

This is a direct attack on Brad Parscale, Trumps' director of digital media.

That don't like that Parscale has found a way to direct-target individual voters.

1 posted on 11/14/2019 10:08:05 AM PST by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen; BenLurkin; Army Air Corps
Literal Communism.

Related image

2 posted on 11/14/2019 10:10:46 AM PST by KC_Lion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

“...the groups — including the NAACP, Color of Change and National Action Network...”

These groups have no standing to tell a private company like Facebook how to conduct their business.


3 posted on 11/14/2019 10:13:06 AM PST by Meatspace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

All politicians do that. That’s where you find Hilary saying things like “I ain’t no-where’s tired!” or “ Where’s the Fried Chicken? I’m ready with a tiny bottle of Hot Sauce right here in my purse!”


4 posted on 11/14/2019 10:13:07 AM PST by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen; Drew68; Army Air Corps
Twitter and Facebook are trying to have it both ways.

"We cannot censor people expressing their beliefs/We are a private company who can pick and chose what is/isn't said on our platform."

If they are the former than EVERYONE needs to be able to us twitter and facebook without fear of banning.

If they are the latter (which is what they and everyone has been leaning towards) than Twitter/Facebook must be in approval of what is being said by say ISIS, Pedophiles, Child Grooming Gangs etc. while they work to outright ban President Trump and all his supporters.

They cannot have it both ways

5 posted on 11/14/2019 10:17:16 AM PST by KC_Lion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Democrat Fascist party in action. These are not “Civil Rights” groups. Their Democrat party activists groups


6 posted on 11/14/2019 10:18:28 AM PST by MNJohnnie (They would have to abandon leftism to achieve sanity. Freeper Olog-hai)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

bttt


7 posted on 11/14/2019 10:21:55 AM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Those aren’t rights groups.

They’re hate groups.


8 posted on 11/14/2019 10:21:57 AM PST by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lee martell
Democrats have been targeting minorities for decades.

Pot calling the kettle black.

9 posted on 11/14/2019 10:24:24 AM PST by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lee martell

When Her Heinous ran for US Senate from NY, while speaking at an Orthodox Synagogue in Monsey she condescendingly pulled the old “you know, I recently found out I have Jewish ancestry in my family” routine. Fauxcahontas, meet FauxcaYENTA. She’s trans ethnic.


10 posted on 11/14/2019 10:26:24 AM PST by Impala64ssa (Virtue signalling is no virtue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

we demand that you block and ban white privilege.


11 posted on 11/14/2019 10:27:19 AM PST by Pollard (If you don't understand what I typed, you haven't read the classics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

In other words, suppress anything that Republicans say.


12 posted on 11/14/2019 10:28:59 AM PST by I want the USA back (The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it. Orwell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

I recall Biden addressing a black audience, and saying something ridiculous, like “The republicans want to put you in chains!”. What??

And some black democrats were dumb enough (zombie enough) to applaud that line.


13 posted on 11/14/2019 10:29:40 AM PST by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

ballot harvesting by the ‘civil rights’ mob - good
ballot harvesting by Orange Man - bad


14 posted on 11/14/2019 12:21:36 PM PST by blueplum ("...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie; yesthatjallen; Drew68; Army Air Corps
FR thread: Politicians Won’t Be Allowed on Facebook If They’ve Previously Been Banned
15 posted on 11/17/2019 8:52:14 AM PST by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Mozart tells you what it's like to be human. Bach tells you what it's like to be the universe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson