Posted on 11/14/2019 8:03:54 AM PST by SeekAndFind
These facts cannot be disputed:
1. Former Vice President Joe Biden admitted and bragged on TV that he threatened to withhold one billion dollars in American foreign aid to Ukraine if Ukraine did not fire the prosecutor investigating Burisma. Burisma was paying Hunter Biden, son of the Joe Biden, over $50,000 per month as a board member of Burisma. There is no dirt to dig up. Joe Biden admitted to the dirt.
2. The Obama-Biden administration did not supply military aid to Ukraine when Ukraine needed the aid against Russia. This was admitted by the acting ambassador to the Ukraine, William Taylor, in his testimony.Trump in December 2017 announced that the United States would send military aid to Ukraine that then–Ukraine president Poroshenko requested from the USA. Obama and Biden had refused the sale of $47 million's worth of Javelin antitank missiles.
In May 2018, after Ukraine tested its new Javelin missiles, Poroshenko thanked Trump for supporting Ukraine and providing the Javelin antitank missile systems.
3. On July 25, 2019 President Trump asked Ukraine's President Zelensky to investigate Ukraine's involvement in the 2016 election. There is evidence that Ukraine helped Hillary in the 2016 election and tried to sabotage the Trump election.
4. The transcript of the phone call was released by President Trump. The transcript speaks for itself. There is no mention of conditioning American aid on any investigation of Biden.
5. There was no investigation by Ukraine into the 2016 election or any investigation of Joe Biden.
6. Ukraine received the American military aid that is the subject of the "impeachment inquiry" on September 11, 2019, six weeks after the July 25, 2019 phone call between President Trump and President Zelensky.
7. The Democrats have refused to produce the so-called "whistleblower" to testify.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
9. Shifty Schiff is calling as "witnesses" State Department employees who are giving their opinions about the meaning of the transcript and their opinion of the events. They do not agree with President Trump's foreign policy. We have the transcript, and anyone, including Congress, can decide what it means. It means exactly what the words of the transcript show: no quid pro quo, nothing illegal.
Adan Schiff, Jerrold Nadler, Nancy Pelosi can do whatever they want to...but...Democrat, Joe Biden is dead-in-the-water. politically forever..period!!! That folks is hard fact of life...you can bank on it!!!
Schiff, you are done.
Get off-stage.
You have nothing but hatred.
All Democrats have is hearsay. They have no case and they can’t tie Trump
to anything illegal.
Their first day was a flop! Its going downhill from here on out.
Hmmm. As far as nuzzlin’ joe threatening to withhold the money and bragging about it, he did that at the CFR meeting and from what I take it was his usual “See what a bad ass I am!” ramblings. Sort of like his story of how he backed down ‘corn pop’ and his posse back when he was a life guard. Is there any evidence he did it? Not defending him in the least but I think too much is being made of his comments to his buddies.
The media is acting like President Trump’s guilt has been completely established.
These people need to lose their broadcast licenses. Lying is not protected speech.
Farce and circus.
Go home.
“Their first day was a flop! Its going downhill from here on out”.
Pelosi just said in a press conference that no decision to impeach has bee made. I think they’ll back off.
I don’t think this will get to the senate for trial. The Rats don’t have a case and besides, they do not want discovery.
This is just the Democrat Party’s
ATTACK TO DEFEND PLAN
They know that Democrat leaders have committed crimes.
They are attacking to try and prevent the prosecution of Democrat leaders.
If no one watched it, does a bear still sh*t in the woods?
No minds were changed yesterday and polls are looking grim for the Democrats.
In a sane world, Democrats would cut their losses and move on.
For years many of us here and other similarly minded places cried out that there was a deep state with an agenda counter to the best interests of the citizens, that the state department was packed with communists and globalists (same thing) that inject their own ideology into national foreign policy in insidious ways, and that the surveillance state was dangerous and could be used against us.
We were all called kooks and conspiracy theory wingnuts. And here we are.
Now that they have a transcript that shows Trump asked someone to look into the corruption of a political rival, they suddenly find what they call high crimes and misdemeanors. Their credibility is so far gone that they can't comprehend how silly they look.
Any of us with half a brain new as soon as they put this to the public and allowed Republicans to actually talk they were going to get their ass handed to them !
We have some very good and eloquent Republicans they can very easily go toe to toe and destroy these moronic Democrats who can’t even speak a sentence without going uhmmmm. Uhhh uhmmmm
A fact of life is whenever anybody’s trying to tell you something and they stop and go “ uhmmm uhhh “ in the middle. They’re LYING
I think you are spot on with Biden.
What strikes me is the sense that Trump has kicked a rats nest with Biden and others involving Ukraine and they are all on attack thinking they can get Trump before he get them. I think Trump wins this battle but it’s getting ugly.
The primary target is to drag out the current process as long as possible - with the aid of our patently dishonest, thoroughly biased 24/7 MSM Trump will be established as a substantially flawed and unfit president that ultimately will be protected by the corrupt R's. It will soon become as fixed as Climate Warming.
They intend to run Trump out of office via Hillary's popular vote bolstered by naive, walk-by voters (along with other election tools that are available).
My take: if the GOP and Trump do not effectively match the MSM in volume and consistency with a unified voice, despite eventually prevailing in the proceedings, they (we) may well lose the election.
I believe he asked them to look into Crowd Strike, not a political rival. Looking into Crowd Strike, shows he wanted to get to the bottom of the 2016 election collusion. President Trump never brought up Biden in the transcript.
Their credibility is so far gone that they can't comprehend how silly they look.
Agreed.
I hate hearing Nancy Pelosi speak for what the ‘American People’ want....
Nancy Pelosi is a democrat leader.
She can say, “This is how democrats feel’... BUT SHE SHOULD NEVER SPEAK FOR THE ‘AMERICAN PEOPLE’. She doesn’t represents me or any other conservative. Stop insulting us Nancy...
“Is there any evidence he did it? Not defending him in the least but I think too much is being made of his comments to his buddies.”
This one is a little bigger than the life guard thing. This borders on the edge of terrorism and definitely falls under the blanket of corruption the 1999 Treaty signed by both countries falls into since the investigation being referenced was about his son’s company in the Ukraine.
Sorry for the adds and all, but I wanted to use a WSJ tape to legitimize the video.
rwood
So this guy overheard a phone conversation in a restaurant and he told someone his interpretation of it to some one who told it to Taylor a couple of months after the fact... just when the democrats needed something new about Trump and Biden investigation.
Yesterday Seb Gorka told a caller it’s not a crime for the media to lie.
He said if you want something done about it, go to CNN headquarters in Atlanta and organize a protest.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.