Posted on 11/04/2019 8:28:30 AM PST by SeekAndFind
The Federalist has learned that the now-outed CIA and FBI informant Stefan Halper served as a source for Washington Post reporter David Ignatius, providing more evidence that the intelligence community has co-opted the press to push anti-Trump conspiracy theories. In addition, an email recently obtained by The Federalist from the MI5-connected Christopher Andrew bragging that his long-time friend Ignatius has the inside track on Flynn adds further confirmation of this conclusion.
Svetlana Lokhova, the Russian-born English citizen and Soviet-era scholar, told The Federalist that she only realized the significance of her communications with and about Ignatius following the filing of attorney Sidney Powells reply brief in the Michael Flynn case.
In last weeks court filing, Powell highlighted how the CIA, FBI, Halper, and possibly James Baker used the unnamed and unaware Lokhova and the complicit Ignatius to destroy Flynn. This James Baker is not the one who worked under James Comey at the FBI, but a James Baker in the Department of Defense Office of National Assessment.
Powell wrote:
Stefan Halper is a known long-time operative for the CIA/FBI. He was paid exorbitant sums by the FBI/CIA/DOD through the Department of Defense Departments Office of Net Assessment in 2016. His tasks seem to have included slandering Mr. Flynn with accusations of having an affair with a young professor (a British national of Russian descent) Flynn met at an official dinner at Cambridge University when he was head of DIA in 2014. Flynn has requested the records of Col. James Baker because he was Halpers handler in the Office of Net Assessment in the Pentagon, and ONA Director Baker regularly lunched with Washington Post Reporter David Ignatius. Baker is believed to be the person who illegally leaked the transcript of Mr. Flynns calls to Ignatius. The defense has requested the phone records of James Clapper to confirm his contacts with Washington Post reporter Ignatiusespecially on January 10, 2017, when Clapper told Ignatius in words to the effect of take the kill shot on Flynn. It cannot escape mention that the press has long had transcripts of the Kislyak calls that the government has denied to the defense.
Lokhova has known of Halpers role in targeting Flynn since Halper was outed as a CIA and FBI informant in May 2018. She then sued Halper and several media outlets for defamation after they falsely repeated Halpers lies that she was a Russian spy engaged in an intrigue with Flynn.
This honey pot storyline originated with Lokhovas mentor at Cambridge, the official MI5 historian, Professor Christopher Andrew, when on February 19, 2017, Andrew penned an article for the London Sunday Times, Impulsive General Misha Shoots Himself in the Foot. That article portrayed the unnamed Lokhovas brief meeting with Flynn during a dinner event two years prior at Cambridge as the beginning of a compromising relationship between Flynn and a Russian spy.
Andrews article later served as the second confirmation needed for outlets like the Wall Street Journal, New York Times, and Washington Post to run stories about Flynn and a supposed Russian spy. But before those pieces hit the press, Lokhova remained in the dark about the medias interest in her.
Halper had been pushing the story that I was a Russian spy and Flynns mistress since December of 2016, Lokhova told me. The New York Times Mathew Rosenberg told me a source had been circulating these stories since December 2016, Lokhova said, but they held the story until they could find a second source and someone at the Cambridge dinner.
In his book The Plot Against the President, Lee Smith confirms that the story about a Flynn-Lokhova intrigue was circulated to the press starting in December 2016.
But it wasnt until the Wall Street Journal published its March 17, 2017, article suggesting she had inappropriate contacts with Flynn that Lokhova discovered the earlier article Andrew had written about her for the Sunday Times, Lokhova said. Before then, within days of February 28, 2017, several journalists reached out to her for comment, including two working for the Wall Street Journal, but Lokhova didnt know why.
She also didnt comprehend who the inquiring journalists were at the time. That remained true even after her mentor and unknown betrayer, Andrew, wrote Lokhova telling her that David Ignatius of Washington Post is in UK at moment. Ive known him for years and trust him. Ive given him your email and he accepts that if you dont wish to respond, that an end to it.
Then, significantly, Andrew noted that Flynn;s [sic] career for years past is obviously going to continue to be investigated. David has an inside track on that which I think hed share with you if youre interested.
What inside track Andrew meant is unknownand when asked what his inside track on Flynn was, Ignatius did not respondbut his note came a mere month after Ignatius reported the illegally leaked details of Flynns conversation with the Russian ambassador, which eventually led to Flynns firing.
Ignatius introductory email to Lokhova also proves informative, with the long-time Washington Post journalist branding the MI5-connected Andrew my friend, and stressing that Andrew invited him to speak to his seminar a dozen years ago.
Lokhova did not talk to Ignatius at the time, but her partner, David North, later forwarded Ignatius an email he had sent to the Wall Street Journal on March 1 2017, making clear that Lokhova had no relationship with Flynn, having met General Flynn on only one occasion at a dinner in Cambridge in February 2014. The dinner was attended by upwards of a dozen people, and she had a twenty-minute public conversation with General Flynn and others. They have not met or spoke since then.
Nonetheless, the Wall Street Journal ran a story about Flynn meeting Lokhova at Cambridge, and for that she is now suing the media mogul for defamation.
When the Wall Street Journal and other media outlets picked up on the story, Lokhova also did not know Halpers role in the rumor-mongering. I had known Halper at Cambridge, Lokhova told me for a previous story, but he was just a boring old academic. I couldnt see why he was painting me as a Russian spy until Halper was exposed as an informant. Then the pieces all fit together.
After Halper was outed as a CIA and FBI informant in May 2018, Lokhova contacted Ignatius. In an email recently obtained by The Federalist, Ignatius replied to Lokhova that hed like very much to ask you about Stefan Halper. When they spoke, Lokhova registered surprise about Halpers role. That prompted Ignatius to say he always found Halper reliable as a source, Lokhova told me. When I said Wow, he was your source, Ignatius hung up. We never spoke again. Ignatius also did not respond to questions about his use of Halper as a source.
These close connections between the Washington Posts Ignatius and individuals connected to the American and British intelligence communities, and the false reporting that has taken place over the last three-plus years, raise grave concerns that the warfare of the soft coup aimed at President Trump includes using the media to push propaganda.
QUOTING TOM FITTON, JUDICIAL WATCH PRESIDENT:
Obama's State Dept was all hands on deck in terms of targeting Trump (as the candidate then as president).
<><> meetings with Glen Simpson, Steele, Clinton aides, Sid Blumenthal and Clinton associate, Cody Shearer.
<><> There was more than one dossier going to the FBI and DOJ.....
<><> there was Christopher Steele's dossier,
<><> and a second dossier created by the State Dept itself, targeting Trump.
<><> shows Jonathan Winer and Glen Simpson were in contact Sept 2016
<><> Winer immediately contacted Victoria Nuland, a top aide at the Obama State Dept.
<><> Post-election, they worked hand in glove with top Dem Steny Hoyer's guy on Russian issues.
<><> (which means if Steny knew, Pelosi knew and if Pelosi knew, Schmanure knew),
<><> They conveyed info gained from Steele, a close to associate of Jonathan Winer.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com .......
The intelligence community hasnt co-opted anyone. Both the intelligence community and the press are part of the same government/political organization.
Harry Truman Writes:
INDEPENDENCE, MO., Dec. 21 — I think it has become necessary to take another look at the purpose and operations of our Central Intelligence Agency—CIA. At least, I would like to submit here the original reason why I thought it necessary to organize this Agency during my Administration, what I expected it to do and how it was to operate as an arm of the President.
I think it is fairly obvious that by and large a President's performance in office is as effective as the information he has and the information he gets. That is to say, that assuming the President himself possesses a knowledge of our history, a sensitive understanding of our institutions, and an insight into the needs and aspirations of the people, he needs to have available to him the most accurate and up-to-the-minute information on what is going on everywhere in the world, and particularly of the trends and developments in all the danger spots in the contest between East and West. This is an immense task and requires a special kind of an intelligence facility.
Of course, every President has available to him all the information gathered by the many intelligence agencies already in existence. The Departments of State, Defense, Commerce, Interior and others are constantly engaged in extensive information gathering and have done excellent work.
But their collective information reached the President all too frequently in conflicting conclusions. At times, the intelligence reports tended to be slanted to conform to established positions of a given department. This becomes confusing and what's worse, such intelligence is of little use to a President in reaching the right decisions.
Therefore, I decided to set up a special organization charged with the collection of all intelligence reports from every available source, and to have those reports reach me as President without department "treatment" or interpretations.
I wanted and needed the information in its "natural raw" state and in as comprehensive a volume as it was practical for me to make full use of it. But the most important thing about this move was to guard against the chance of intelligence being used to influence or to lead the President into unwise decisions—and I thought it was necessary that the President do his own thinking and evaluating.
Since the responsibility for decision making was his—then he had to be sure that no information is kept from him for whatever reason at the discretion of any one department or agency, or that unpleasant facts be kept from him. There are always those who would want to shield a President from bad news or misjudgments to spare him from being "upset."
For some time I have been disturbed by the way CIA has been diverted from its original assignment. It has become an operational and at times a policy-making arm of the Government. This has led to trouble and may have compounded our difficulties in several explosive areas.
I never had any thought that when I set up the CIA that it would be injected into peacetime cloak and dagger operations. Some of the complications and embarrassment I think we have experienced are in part attributable to the fact that this quiet intelligence arm of the President has been so removed from its intended role that it is being interpreted as a symbol of sinister and mysterious foreign intrigue—and a subject for cold war enemy propaganda.
With all the nonsense put out by Communist propaganda about "Yankee imperialism," "exploitive capitalism," "war-mongering," "monopolists," in their name-calling assault on the West, the last thing we needed was for the CIA to be seized upon as something akin to a subverting influence in the affairs of other people.
I well knew the first temporary director of the CIA, Adm. Souers, and the later permanent directors of the CIA, Gen. Hoyt Vandenberg and Allen Dulles. These were men of the highest character, patriotism and integrity—and I assume this is true of all those who continue in charge.
But there are now some searching questions that need to be answered. I, therefore, would like to see the CIA be restored to its original assignment as the intelligence arm of the President, and that whatever else it can properly perform in that special field—and that its operational duties be terminated or properly used elsewhere.
We have grown up as a nation, respected for our free institutions and for our ability to maintain a free and open society. There is something about the way the CIA has been functioning that is casting a shadow over our historic position and I feel that we need to correct it.
Correct. And this is the Deep State. The Deep State are those in government who, incorrectly, believe they are morally superior to the U.S. Constitution and act in a clearly subversive manner to undermine the will and authority of the United States President. They actively do this by colluding with a willing, co-conspiratorial MSM.
They did this to Reagan. They did this to Bush. Difference is that Reagan and Bush did little or nothing to push back.
fyi
how many times are these criminal spies allowed
to attempt to take out the ELECTED PRESIDENT.
once? twice? three times?
when will someone in the military or what is left
of the DOJ actually do something?
fyi
One small but major change:
One of the reasons why the Flynn legal situation is so interesting is not really because of Flynn himself;
but rather because the Flynn situation is an example of then-Pres Obamas surveillance network in operation.
QUOTING TOM FITTON, JUDICIAL WATCH PRESIDENT:
Obama’s State Dept was all hands on deck in terms of targeting Trump (as the candidate then as president).
<><> meetings with Glen Simpson, Steele, Clinton aides, Sid Blumenthal and Clinton associate, Cody Shearer.
<><> There was more than one dossier going to the FBI and DOJ.....
<><> there was Christopher Steele’s dossier,
<><> and a second dossier created by the State Dept itself, targeting Trump.
<><> shows Jonathan Winer and Glen Simpson were in contact Sept 2016
<><> Winer immediately contacted Victoria Nuland, a top aide at the Obama State Dept.
<><> Post-election, they worked hand in glove with top Dem Steny Hoyer’s guy on Russian issues.
<><> (which means if Steny knew, Pelosi knew and if Pelosi knew, Schmanure knew),
<><> They conveyed info gained from Steele, a close to associate of Jonathan Winer.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com .......
Listening to McLaughlin and Brennan commenting last week, they themselves feel they are patriots and moral actors of the highest order. What is to be done about that?
Criminal conspiracy is no mere theory, it is a legal charge
Thanks for posting this excellent and thorough document!
Their self-assigned primary mission seems to be to overthrow governments around the world that they dont like, including our own.
“When George HW Bush first spoke about his New World Order, I did not take it seriously.
I should have.
All of us should have.”
________________________________________________
When those of us did, we were called whackjobs or kooks!!
Not so crazy now it appears!!
Not the first time. I think JFK got fed up with the CIA, the Pentagon and the State Dept, etc, after the Bay of Pigs, the Cuban Missile Crisis and then coup in Vietnam. May have cost him his life.
When George HW Bush first spoke about his New World Order, I did not take it seriously.
******************************************
It had a certain crack-pot sound to it, but I can remember being incensed that GHWBush spoke of it as an admirable thing being worthy of effort (or even mention). The call to battle stations seemed to ring in my head.
“If that’s true, what other propaganda has the CIA given us? For how long? And above all - how deep does their power go?”
In my 81 years:
Nixon being defeated for Potus by JFK in Chicago.
JFK being killed and LBJ becoming our president.
The lies about the Gulf of Tonkin.
Attack on the Liberty.
The capture of the Pueblo.
Both Iraqi wars.
Obama becoming our president for two terms.
The 24/7 attacks on candidate Trump, President Elect Trump, and President Trump in a brazen coup attempt by our intel thugs at all levels.
Propaganda pouring out from ABCNNBCBS 24/7.
Apparent control of Facebook and other similar user sites.
Use of CIA/DOJ/FBI to weaken and take out an elected president.
I’m sure that there is other scary stuff.
If the CIA/NSA/FBI/DOJ bureaucrats get completely away with their brazen law breaking in regard to the 2016 election and their ongoing sedition you can be assured the US voter will NEVER again pick the president. These MIC goons will out right change the votes or eventually decide if need be they will eventually assassinate anyone they don’t approve of, who’s going to stop them? From the rank violations of the UCMJ by generals and admirals retired and active duty they are just as content to hold the voter in contempt as the MIC goons. Your vote will means absolutely nothing to them as it currently does.
For the first couple of years I gave the employees of these agencies the benefit of the doubt about some of them being honest Americans who believed in the rule of law, but at this point I haven’t seen any of them step forward as whistle blowers on the corruption that infects their agencies and I have to conclude they are content to support their fellow travelers efforts, their oaths mean nothing to them and they really arrogantly believe they have the final say for the country even though they are not elected by anyone. So do we really have a republic? With this new paradigm we really do not even have a democracy at the national level.
Pentagon announces 500 tons of Uranium shipped from Iraq to Canada
Good question.
If it keeps going on, it's going to destroy our country.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.