Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/29/2019 5:50:56 AM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: zeestephen

Sorry. That science is settled.

/S


2 posted on 09/29/2019 5:55:07 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zeestephen

btt


3 posted on 09/29/2019 5:55:22 AM PDT by KSCITYBOY (The media is corrupt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zeestephen

A very wise man once said: “Simulation is like masturbation. You do it often enough and you begin to think it’s better than the real thing.”


4 posted on 09/29/2019 5:59:16 AM PDT by DugwayDuke ("A man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zeestephen

Excellent. It’s something we here have known all along; this isn’t about science, it’s about politics.


5 posted on 09/29/2019 6:10:15 AM PDT by NohSpinZone (First thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zeestephen
Below 180ppm plant life begins to die off. So at the current 400ppm CO2 the planet is at a historical CO2 minimum.
6 posted on 09/29/2019 6:13:56 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zeestephen
The behaviors of most natural phenomena are described by differential equations. Most of these equations have no closed form solution, and must be solved by numerical methods. Even a very slight change in initial conditions can cause wildly different outcomes.

Scientists describe this as "the butterfly effect", where a butterfly flapping its wings in the Amazon jungle could impact weather patterns in very dramatic ways, perhaps trigger below normal winters in South Dakota or drought in Russia.

When they teach differential equations in school, they will always include exercises, drills, and examples of how supplying correct initial conditions are mandatory for a useful solution to systems of differential equations. Like they say, "garbage in, garbage out".

When it comes to weather, only God can know the correct initial conditions, and He plays his cards close to His chest.
 

7 posted on 09/29/2019 6:14:33 AM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie (Everything I Needed to Know About Islam I Learned on 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zeestephen

“Now Nakamura has found it again, further accusing the orthodox scientists of “data falsification” by adjusting previous temperature data to increase apparent warming “The global surface mean temperature-change data no longer have any scientific value and are nothing except a propaganda tool to the public,” he writes.”

Another climate scientist who clearly states the temperature history being used by climate hacks is fraudulent.


8 posted on 09/29/2019 6:19:54 AM PDT by JPJones (More Tariffs, less income tax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zeestephen

Excellent paper.

As someone who has worked extensively with weather models, I can validate this is how the models “work”.

Weather models can be useful, because we can validate them against real a thousand times a year (six hour outputs daily), and find their strengths and weaknesses.

It is impossible to do with a climate model. We don’t have the data or the number of runs to validate the models.

Only one set of data of dubious quality, not even one run against contemporary data. (You need a 50 year prediction made before 50 years of data is collected).


9 posted on 09/29/2019 6:24:24 AM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zeestephen

Carbon dioxide is .04% by volume of the content of our atmosphere. That’s not 4/10 of a percent. That’s 4/100 of a percent. With all the hoopla you’d think that the atmosphere is practically comprised mostly of carbon dioxide. Actually around 85 % of the people on earth are stupid.


11 posted on 09/29/2019 6:32:20 AM PDT by HighSierra5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zeestephen
Oh this is going into my collection...

Dr. David Dilley's observations and conclusions

Professor Valentina Zharkova Breaks Her Silence and CONFIRMS “Super” Grand Solar Minimum

A Climate Modeller Spills the Beans - Tony Thomas

7

12 posted on 09/29/2019 6:32:44 AM PDT by infool7 (Your mistakes are not what define you, it's how gracefully you recover from them that does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zeestephen

Great article. Thank you. Been searching for something to refute the globaloney warming theory in arguments with relatives who swear we need to do the multi trillion dollar refit of our economy or we are facing planetary extinction.....


13 posted on 09/29/2019 6:33:57 AM PDT by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zeestephen

Bump


16 posted on 09/29/2019 6:45:02 AM PDT by Maceman (Trump Trumps Hate!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zeestephen

Later


21 posted on 09/29/2019 7:25:03 AM PDT by wjcsux (The hyperventilating of the left means we are winning! (Tagline courtesy of Laz.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zeestephen

How DARE He!?!?!


22 posted on 09/29/2019 7:27:16 AM PDT by left that other site (For America to have CONFIDENCE in our future, we must have PRIDE in our HISTORY... DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zeestephen

Smokes Weed and then models the Clouds(of Smoke) ? LOL


23 posted on 09/29/2019 7:38:10 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zeestephen

bttt


26 posted on 09/29/2019 8:31:05 AM PDT by GOPJ (Did Hunter Biden pay taxes on the $50,000 A MONTH he 'earned' from Ukraine? Freeper sanjuanbob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zeestephen

Garbage In - Garbage Out


27 posted on 09/29/2019 8:32:24 AM PDT by indthkr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zeestephen; Pearls Before Swine; KSCITYBOY; DugwayDuke; NohSpinZone; central_va; ...

LIST OF DOOMSDAY PREDICTIONS THE CLIMATE ALARMIST GOT WRONG:
(FYI - links at bottom:)

1967: Dire Famine Forecast By 1975
1969: Everyone Will Disappear In a Cloud Of Blue Steam By 1989 (1969)
1970: Ice Age By 2000
1970: America Subject to Water Rationing By 1974 and Food Rationing By 1980
1971: New Ice Age Coming By 2020 or 2030
1972: New Ice Age By 2070
1974: Space Satellites Show New Ice Age Coming Fast
1974: Another Ice Age?
1974: Ozone Depletion a ‘Great Peril to Life
1976: Scientific Consensus Planet Cooling, Famines imminent
1980: Acid Rain Kills Life In Lakes
1978: No End in Sight to 30-Year Cooling Trend
1988: Regional Droughts (that never happened) in 1990s
1988: Temperatures in DC Will Hit Record Highs
1988: Maldive Islands will Be Underwater by 2018 (they’re not)
1989: Rising Sea Levels will Obliterate Nations if Nothing Done by 2000
1989: New York City’s West Side Highway Underwater by 2019 (it’s not)
2000: Children Won’t Know what Snow Is
2002: Famine In 10 Years If We Don’t Give Up Eating Fish, Meat, and Dairy
2004: Britain will Be Siberia by 2024
2008: Arctic will Be Ice Free by 2018
2008: Climate Genius Al Gore Predicts Ice-Free Arctic by 2013
2009: Climate Genius Prince Charles Says we Have 96 Months to Save World
2009: UK Prime Minister Says 50 Days to ‘Save The Planet From Catastrophe’
2009: Climate Genius Al Gore Moves 2013 Prediction of Ice-Free Arctic to 2014
2013: Arctic Ice-Free by 2015
2014: Only 500 Days Before ‘Climate Chaos’
1968: Overpopulation Will Spread Worldwide
1970: World Will Use Up All its Natural Resources
1966: Oil Gone in Ten Years
1972: Oil Depleted in 20 Years
1977: Department of Energy Says Oil will Peak in 90s
1980: Peak Oil In 2000
1996: Peak Oil in 2020
2002: Peak Oil in 2010
2006: Super Hurricanes!
2005 : Manhattan Underwater by 2015
1970: Urban Citizens Will Require Gas Masks by 1985
1970: Nitrogen buildup Will Make All Land Unusable
1970: Decaying Pollution Will Kill all the Fish
1970s: Killer Bees!

Sorry, Experts… Sorry, Scientific Consensus… Only a fool comes running for the 42nd cry of wolf.

List ‘experts’ got right:

ZERO

above from links:

https://www.breitbart.com/environment/2019/09/20/nolte-climate-experts-are-0-41-with-their-doomsday-predictions/

https://cei.org/blog/wrong-again-50-years-failed-eco-pocalyptic-predictions


29 posted on 09/29/2019 9:08:05 AM PDT by GOPJ (Did Hunter Biden pay taxes on the $50,000 A MONTH he 'earned' from Ukraine? Freeper sanjuanbob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zeestephen

In 2004 the U.S. Senate was fully briefed on the falsehood of man-made global warming. The U.S. Government clearly knows that we cannot measure carbon dioxide earlier than 1900 to 1930.

http://www.mitosyfraudes.org/Calen5/JawoCO2-Eng.html

Prof. Zbigniew Jaworowski testified before the U.S. Senate on March 13, 2004:

Improper manipulation of data, and arbitrary rejection of readings that do not fit the pre-conceived idea on man-made global warming is common in many glaciological studies of greenhouse gases. In peer reviewed publications I exposed this misuse of science.

The basis of most of the IPCC conclusions on anthropogenic causes and on projections of climatic change is the assumption of low level of CO2 in the pre-industrial atmosphere. This assumption, based on glaciological studies, is false. Therefore IPCC projections should not be used for national and global economic planning.

Prof. Zbigniew Jaworowski. Chairman, Scientific Council of Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection, Warsaw, Poland, Statement before the US Senate Committee

on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, March 19, 2004

Prof. Zbigniew Jaworowski explained his qualifications to the Senate:

For the past 40 years I was involved in glacier studies, using snow and ice as a matrix for reconstruction of history of man-made pollution of the global atmosphere. A part of these studies was related to the climatic issues.

Ice core records of CO2 have been widely used as a proof that, due to man’s activity the current atmospheric level of CO2 is about 25% higher than in the pre-industrial period. These records became the basic input parameters in the models of the global carbon cycle and a cornerstone of the man-made climatic warming hypothesis.

These records do not represent the atmospheric reality, as I will try to demonstrate in my statement.

In order to study the history of industrial pollution of the global atmosphere, between 1972 and 1980, I organized 11 glacier expeditions, which measured natural and man-made pollutants in contemporary and ancient precipitation, preserved in 17 glaciers in Arctic, Antarctic, Alaska, Norway, the Alps, the Himalayas, the Ruwenzori Mountains in Uganda, the Peruvian Andes and in Tatra Mountains in Poland.

In the 1990s I was working in the Norwegian Polar Research Institute in Oslo, and in the Japanese National Institute of Polar Research in Tokyo. In this period I studied the effects of climatic change on polar regions, and the reliability of glacier studies for estimation of CO2 concentration in the ancient atmosphere.

Id.

Prof. Jaworowski explained why chemistry, including intense pressure under the weight of layers of glacial ice, change the air sample from its original composition:

More than 20 physico-chemical processes, mostly related to the presence of liquid water, contribute to the alteration of the original chemical composition of the air inclusions in polar ice.

One of these processes is formation of gas hydrates or clathrates. In the highly compressed deep ice all air bubbles disappear, as under the influence of pressure the gases change into the solid clathrates, which are tiny crystals formed by interaction of gas with water molecules. Drilling decompresses cores excavated from deep ice, and contaminates them with the drilling fluid filling the borehole.

* * * After decompression of the ice cores, the solid clathrates decompose into a gas form, exploding in the process as if they were microscopic grenades. In the bubble-free ice the explosions form a new gas cavities and new cracks. Through these cracks, and cracks formed by sheeting, a part of gas escapes first into the drilling liquid which fills the borehole, and then at the surface to the atmospheric air.

* * * This leads to depletion of CO2 in the gas trapped in the ice sheets. This is why the records of CO2 concentration in the gas inclusions from deep polar ice show the values lower than in the contemporary atmosphere, even for the epochs when the global surface temperature was higher than now.

Id.


42 posted on 10/04/2019 5:15:34 AM PDT by Moseley (http://www.MoseleyReport.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson