Posted on 09/13/2019 7:21:42 PM PDT by Helicondelta
Joe Biden had attempted to inject some sanity in the Democratic debate over gun control by noting that presidents dont have the authority in the Constitution to order seizures of firearms and banning guns.
Harris, a former AG, literally laughed off that concern when ABC News anchor David Muir asked her about it
Kamala Harris replied to Biden's claim that her proposed exec order would be unconstitutional by *laughing* and blithely saying "instead of saying no we can't, how about yes we can".
HARRIS: Well, I mean, I would just say, hey, Joe, instead of saying, no, we cant, lets say yes, we can.
BIDEN: Lets be constitutional. Weve got a Constitution.
HARRIS: And yes, we can, because Ill tell you something. The way that I think about this is, Ive seen more autopsy photographs than I care to tell you.
(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...
Three Nationality Harris is not Constitutionally eligible.
She had a strange giggle when she said “yes we can”, and another really bizarre sounding giggle when she said Trump reminds her of the Wizard of Oz. She was slurring some of her words too. She sounded a bit under the influence. if you know what I mean.
Go sit on a cylindrical shaped object.
Camela will be walking point through the ‘hoods?
What a bimbo.
Were I do really want to make a case that women were inferior, I’d simply point out pretty much every female dimbulbcrat.
Thankfully, my spouse, and virtually all the women I know could out think these cretin creatures with - wait for it - half their brains tied behind their backs.
Went for emotion vs logic/intellect....classic liberal
Commie-la
Most of the candidates plan on becoming a tyrannical dictator, not president.
I suppose that if we allow her to do that, she can do it.
IF there’s one thing that we can give the POTUS credit for, it’s the snatching off of the mask that the RAT party has been hiding behind for along time. And what’s underneath it is a sight to behold. Of course, most of us Freepers already knew what was under there. Under that so-called, mild-mannered, liberal mask was a full-blown, outright communist party that is hell-bent on destroying our nation and all it stands for as we now know it. The communists knew they could never take us on the field of battle. It took years of infiltration into our education and political systems to get to where they are today. They’ve now taken over the traditional democratic party and their mask has been ripped off. So now here we stand, face-to-face, against this new communist party. These communist SOBs need to be stopped..BIG TIME. It is imperative that every single one of us gets out and votes. And we need to drag friends, relatives, neighbors that will vote for Trump with us.
Our nation, culture, way of life, everything we hold dear and future generations are depending on us.
She sounded drunk. Foster Brooks sounded more sober.
No.
Democrats obey the Constitution almost as well as they fight to protect the helpless and innocent unborn.
Please be first in line to confiscate!
but then she would blame conservatives for her bruised butt cheeks when she hit the ground! :)
thank you very much for posting that ruling.
What happened the first time our rulers tried take our guns away from us?
I enclose you a list of the killed, wounded, and captives of the enemy from the commencement of hostilities at Lexington in April, 1775, until November, 1777, since which there has been no event of any consequence
I think that upon the whole it has been about one half the number lost by them, in some instances more, but in others less. This difference is ascribed to our superiority in taking aim when we fire; every soldier in our army having been intimate with his gun from his infancy. - Thomas Jefferson, letter to Giovanni Fabbroni, June 8, 1778
Kamala the Whore needs to lay off the meth.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.