Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/17/2019 3:54:06 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

Simply solution - don’t nationalize insurance.

This would’ve been a good example to use as one of the “why not”s for commie care.


2 posted on 08/17/2019 3:56:58 AM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The WWII bunkers along the gulf coast have weathered these storms well. Why not redesign such megamansion development?


3 posted on 08/17/2019 4:14:08 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Denounce DUAC - The Democrats Un-American Activists Commitee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Capitalism, baby...with a tan!


4 posted on 08/17/2019 4:14:16 AM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Beach houses might be getting bigger and bigger, but I’m sure the virtue signaling liberals who lives there CARE more about the environment than the rest of us. So...it’s all good.


5 posted on 08/17/2019 4:38:08 AM PDT by rbg81 (Truth is stranger than fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

We taxpayers are being taken for a ride twice and congress knows it and does nothing. If you choose to build your house where you know it is going to flood, you should not expect the taxpayer to help with your insurance bill.

Same thing with student loans. These loans are an absolute folly and congress knows it yet they continue unabated. They are no different from the sub- prime loans. People are being loaned exorbitant amounts of money with no visible means or intention of paying it back.

People are building expensive homes (many that will never be their primary residences) in the eyes of hurricanes and the taxpayer funded flood insurance is making it possible.

Both situations are examples of government subsidized insanity brought to us by our congress.


6 posted on 08/17/2019 4:57:00 AM PDT by Saltmeat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Should Taxpayers Subsidize More and More Destruction?

Is this another ABORTION thread?


9 posted on 08/17/2019 5:03:19 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
The answer is no

Although southern locations are noted, unscrupulous or just plain ignorant
real estate developers sold property on Staten island within hurricane destruction zone.

When the hurricane actually destroyed the property, the press reacted as if God himself had it in for New York. None of destroyed Staten Island should have been rebuilt.

In my personal survey, I have determined that a cat 5 or possible direct cat 4 hit on Miami will devastate property in inestimable billions of $$. None of Miami can be billed to tax payers.

12 posted on 08/17/2019 5:04:48 AM PDT by bert ( (KE. NP. N.btyC. +12) Progressives are existential American enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

If states were made to pay for their own beach “replenishment” programs, we’d have a lot less of this cr@p.


13 posted on 08/17/2019 5:08:03 AM PDT by mewzilla (Break out the mustard seeds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The author completely forgot the rest of the flood ins scam, the millions of homes in flood plains next to rivers.

He/she figured that more outrage would be generated by multi-million beach houses, rather than the millions modest homes near rivers.

I think we should get the government out of the Ins business once and for all.


14 posted on 08/17/2019 5:11:19 AM PDT by Beagle8U (It's not whether you win or lose, it's how you place the blame.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Heck ya,

What are taxpayer good for anyway?


15 posted on 08/17/2019 5:14:42 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Heck ya,

What are taxpayers good for anyway?


16 posted on 08/17/2019 5:15:05 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I don’t know about the hotels and such...

My understanding is that when houses are being rebuilt they must include new building materials and designs that will withstand the weather that goes with the beautiful view on the coast.

That’s one of the reasons house construction shot up after the 2000s.

Me, myself? Not going to live on the coast. While I can swim fairly well, I get a wee bit nervous around that much water.

LOL


23 posted on 08/17/2019 6:10:06 AM PDT by Notthereyet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

This is going to turn into a “why are people building on the coast anyway, and why should my insurance dollars pay for it?” That could be true of anything. I pay higher rates for my Hurricane insurance and a higher deductible (no, I’m not on the beach). I also pay into the National Flood Insurance Program. I could sit here and easily complain about why my money goes towards those living in the flood plains (why do they have to build there/s), or those that live in wildfire areas, or tornado alley, or in earthquake zones...but I don’t. There’s a hazard out there for anyone, and as long as you live up to the expectations of the insurance provider, you should expect to be covered for loss...no matter private or government insurance. The owner should also build to code, my house in Florida was built in 2003. 16 years and many hurricanes later-no claims yet.


24 posted on 08/17/2019 6:16:48 AM PDT by USAF1985 (Now is the time for all good men and women to come to the aid of their country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

what the Feds are really insuring are the local and state tax revenue streams flowing from property and sales taxes, restaurant taxes etc. that prop up all the regional munibonds in waterfront states and cities.

THATS why the incentive for bigger replacement beach houses
Any place generating 40K per week rental revenue is taxed by the state and spins off at least that in ancillary expenditures and tax revenue locally

Its always about the cash flow-and generally into burocratic coffers


25 posted on 08/17/2019 6:25:58 AM PDT by mo ("If you understand, no explanation is needed; if you don't understand, no explanation is possible")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

My folks live in Cape May New Jersey

I’ve been all up and down the coast of all the barrier islands south of Manitoloking

I can tell you one thing that along the coast all of those houses for hundreds of miles are all worth $1 million plus and that goes for a few streets inland as well

Wildwood. Ocean city. Stone harbor. Avalon margate Benton etc

Furthermore There’s nobody in these giant mansions except for in the summer.

In the fall winter and spring all of the bustling city is in the summer Are ghost towns

So the bottom line is the state of New Jersey reaps incredible monies from these giant mega mansions which really just sit there almost all of the time and that’s how their government even exists


28 posted on 08/17/2019 11:07:59 AM PDT by Truthoverpower (The guvmint you get is the Trump winning express !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson