Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal judge overseeing key lawsuit relating to pedophile Jeffrey Epstein dies
FOX News ^ | 03/26/2019

Posted on 08/14/2019 7:09:40 AM PDT by Kevin in California

A U.S. District Court judge in New York who was presiding over a lawsuit involving a wealthy, Clinton-connected financier and sex offender died Sunday at the age of 96. Robert W. Sweet died at his home in Ketchum, Idaho, while on vacation, The New York Times reported. He was appointed by President Jimmy Carter in 1978. Politico reported that Sweet was presiding over the lawsuit that followed what many saw as an unusual plea deal for Jeffrey Epstein. Alexander Acosta, the current U.S. Secretary of Labor, negotiated what critics called a sweetheart, potentially corrupt plea deal with Jeffrey Epstein when he was the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of Florida. The arrangement required Epstein to pay restitution to dozens of victims, but offered a variety of unusual concessions as part of a non-prosecution agreement.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: again; clintonbodycount; epstein; judiciary; peanutboyjudge; plotthickens
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
Any of you remember this story back in March of this guy's "coincidental" death?

Was he added to the "arkancide" list too?

1 posted on 08/14/2019 7:09:40 AM PDT by Kevin in California
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

Well, he was 96 ...


2 posted on 08/14/2019 7:11:32 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

He was 96. Or so the media CLAIMS. ;>)


3 posted on 08/14/2019 7:11:44 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

Why would you choose someone in his nineties to preside over a case?


4 posted on 08/14/2019 7:12:08 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

At 96, I think we can’t rule out natural causes, though how many other 90-somethings are presiding over cases?


5 posted on 08/14/2019 7:12:21 AM PDT by aynrandfreak (Being a Democrat means never having to say you're sorry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

I can’t say, but maybe he should be given an honorable mention until it is conclusively proven different.


6 posted on 08/14/2019 7:12:27 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marron
Why would you choose someone in his nineties to preside over a case?

Nobody younger wanted to touch it.

7 posted on 08/14/2019 7:14:19 AM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

And he was only 96! Struck down in the prime of his life...

What causes a person to continue on in such a job at the age of 96? His home life must be really boring.


8 posted on 08/14/2019 7:14:23 AM PDT by cuban leaf (We're living in Dr. Zhivago but without the love triangle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California
Another Busy Day At The Clinton Foundation.
Records to update, alibis to be confirmed, palms to be greased, warnings to be issued...

KEEPER OF THE ARKANCIDE SCROLLS


9 posted on 08/14/2019 7:16:48 AM PDT by Vlad The Inhaler (Liberals no longer glorify heroic deeds, They glorify whining that they call heroic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marron
Why would you choose someone in his nineties to preside over a case?

Makes no sense. A guy that age probably made frequent use of the "I'm so old I don't buy green bananas any more!" joke. Why would he be expected to last through a prolonged trial?

10 posted on 08/14/2019 7:19:15 AM PDT by Sans-Culotte (If it weren't for fake hate crimes, there would be no hate crimes at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

From his wiki page he looked like a good solid judge with a civil libertarian bent. He was semi-retired and I hope this wasn’t arkencide, because losing this guy is definitely a loss.


11 posted on 08/14/2019 7:23:20 AM PDT by BlackAdderess (Why does Harvard invest in developing world land grabs that harm indigenous people, then yell at us?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

Does he qualify for the CBC? (Clinton Body count)


12 posted on 08/14/2019 7:23:29 AM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sans-Culotte

I’m sure his clerks did all the work; he was likely selected because he was compliant, and the rulings would go the way the government wanted. (MOO)


13 posted on 08/14/2019 7:23:35 AM PDT by CondorFlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Maybe they got his age backwards?


14 posted on 08/14/2019 7:24:36 AM PDT by SkyDancer ( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

With a pillow over his face, by any chance?


15 posted on 08/14/2019 7:24:50 AM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

death of the judge is an automatic mistrial...FWIW


16 posted on 08/14/2019 7:25:49 AM PDT by mo ("If you understand, no explanation is needed; if you don't understand, no explanation is possible")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California
It does point to the political abuse by the courts.

The ONLY reason to stay on the bench at that age is to exact a political agenda.

17 posted on 08/14/2019 7:28:19 AM PDT by G Larry (There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AU72

He’s definitely not the kind of judge they would like to face because his rulings indicate he was honest.


18 posted on 08/14/2019 7:30:17 AM PDT by BlackAdderess (Why does Harvard invest in developing world land grabs that harm indigenous people, then yell at us?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

Did he die of, “old age” while stuffed into a body bag with his hands zip tied behind his back?


19 posted on 08/14/2019 7:31:14 AM PDT by miliantnutcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

He was a civil libertarian in the good sense. We would be fortunate to have more judges like he was. The problem we have is that the ones who get promoted are often promoted because they can be counted on to rule a certain was. Think John Robert’s.


20 posted on 08/14/2019 7:35:24 AM PDT by BlackAdderess (Why does Harvard invest in developing world land grabs that harm indigenous people, then yell at us?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson