To: fortheDeclaration
Honestly, I’d rather have Ratcliffe in the House.
To: Nothingburger
I'd rather have Ratcliffe in the House too. I don't understand the hysteria with others here. There are a lot of other people besides Ratcliffe qualified for the DNI posting and it would be likely more difficult replacing Ratcliffe in the House.
I prefer to see the upside.
To: Nothingburger
I wonder if that’s the thought process instead.
To: Nothingburger
Honestly, I’d rather have Ratcliffe in the House.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I agree
143 posted on
08/02/2019 3:01:49 PM PDT by
thinden
To: Nothingburger
“Honestly, I’d rather have Ratcliffe in the House.”
Strategically, that makes sense to have a strong ally like Ratcliffe in the House. All the whining never-Trumpers and Soros trolls will be along shortly to scream like little girls and bash Trump.
149 posted on
08/02/2019 4:10:49 PM PDT by
sergeantdave
(Teach a man to fish and he'll steal your gear and sell it)
To: Nothingburger
Yes. We lost c.44, we are losing more. He is one the few apparent conservatives. I was not happy with his nomination.
156 posted on
08/02/2019 4:23:50 PM PDT by
YogicCowboy
("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
To: Nothingburger
Honestly, I’d rather have Ratcliffe in the House. I agree.
176 posted on
08/02/2019 9:14:35 PM PDT by
nutmeg
(democRATs: The party of Infanticide, Open Borders, Crime, High Taxes and "Free" Sh*t)
To: Nothingburger
I agree! I think he has a good political career ahead of him; being a member of Trumps cabinet could well end it. He seems to be doing a great job in Congress; and DNI is not really a stepping stone to greater things.
203 posted on
08/03/2019 6:31:53 AM PDT by
Segovia
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson