[SamAdams76]

I'd rather have Ratcliffe in the House too. I don't understand the hysteria with others here. There are a lot of other people besides Ratcliffe qualified for the DNI posting and it would be likely more difficult replacing Ratcliffe in the House.

I prefer to see the upside.

[FreeReign]

There are a lot of other people besides Ratcliffe qualified for the DNI posting and it would be likely more difficult replacing Ratcliffe in the House. I prefer to see the upside.

If you trust the same people that torpedoed Radcliffe to approve another anti Deep State guy, then yes.

[Jane Long]

I’d rather have Ratcliffe in the House too. I don’t understand the hysteria with others here. There are a lot of other people besides Ratcliffe qualified for the DNI posting and it would be likely more difficult replacing Ratcliffe in the House.

I prefer to see the upside.

---

Agree.

Nothing but UPSIDE, here.

[Nothingburger]

You know, what I’d really like to see is DJT abolish the office and transfer the duties to some other trusted subordinate — one not subject to confirmation.

As I posted earlier, I’d rather see Ratcliffe where he is. We need all the real conservatives we can get in Congress. He will continue to do yeoman work alongside Jordan, Meadows, Collins, Gaetz, Biggs, others.

[sergeantdave]

“I’d rather have Ratcliffe in the House too. I don’t understand the hysteria with others here.”

The hysteria is perfectly understandable. It allows FR’s resident doom and gloom defeatists to run around and screech like little girls.