Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

St. Louis couple says wedding dress designer refused...because of their sexual orientation
Q13 Fox ^ | 7/10/19

Posted on 07/11/2019 4:44:13 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper

A St. Louis couple said a wedding dress designer refused to make a garment for them, saying it goes against her faith.

Tiffany Allen and Angel Lane said they reached out to the New York-based company, D. AUXILLY, through e-mail to get some information. They said the designer, Dominique Galbraith, responded.....

""I wouldn't be able to make a piece for a same-sex wedding. It goes against my faith in Christ. I believe Jesus died for our sins so that we would live for him according to His Holy Word...."

Marcia McCormick, a professor with the St. Louis University School of Law said the company is violating the law.

"The dressmaker is violating New York State law..."

(Excerpt) Read more at q13fox.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: antichristian; freedom; homofascism; homosexuality; media; religion; submit
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
Law professor who thinks state law supersedes First Amendment.
1 posted on 07/11/2019 4:44:13 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Taking bets on this as a premeditated singling out out the wedding dress designer.


2 posted on 07/11/2019 4:48:48 AM PDT by Tench_Coxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

The anti-Christian, hatemongering perverts continue to attack First Amendment rights in their efforts to destroy the United States.


3 posted on 07/11/2019 4:49:33 AM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tench_Coxe

Yep


4 posted on 07/11/2019 4:50:24 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

I remember when homosexuals claimed that all they wanted was just to “be left alone.”

Hm. No tolerance for other faiths or perspectives. And now they use the power of the state to beat up on people who don’t go along with their lifestyle. That’s just fascist.


5 posted on 07/11/2019 4:52:01 AM PDT by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

I’ll design their dresses for next to nothing. Synthetic tar-like resin and feathers over burlap. Part of my “Wind Beneath the Wings” series.


6 posted on 07/11/2019 4:52:33 AM PDT by VietVet876
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

The wedding dress designer could simply accept the task on the basis that her stylistic view of “the art” must be paramount - and then sketch out a dress in rainbow colors rather than white since the “bride” is likely not a virgin. “You want something in white? Go to one of those lesser sources, like Nordstrom’s!” Make it as flamboyantly, over the top, dramatic as possible to ensure the couple never wants to see her again. Compliance with SJW demands can take off in all sorts of unplanned directions.


7 posted on 07/11/2019 4:53:21 AM PDT by Pecos (My rights as an individual are not subject to a public vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tench_Coxe

An effort to get the interstate commerce law (I think that is what it is called) to apply to social issues. Missouri, they will say, must apply NY’s law regardless of First Amendment protections...and/or NY based businesses must apply anti-1A laws across state lines.


8 posted on 07/11/2019 4:53:40 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

They could have gone to another shop. They didn’t because they researched the shop owners and they are so filled with hate they do this on purpose. They might as well have horns growing out of their head.


9 posted on 07/11/2019 4:54:29 AM PDT by CincyRichieRich (Vote for President Trump in 2020 or end up equally miserable, no rights, and eating zoo animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

All they need to do is pull out an old design and charge them $950,000.01 to make it.


10 posted on 07/11/2019 4:55:14 AM PDT by VastRWCon (Fake News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Christians must adhere.


11 posted on 07/11/2019 4:55:29 AM PDT by bray (Pray for President Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tench_Coxe

I agree. They probably searched the web for someone whose website included Christian terms or images.

That said, any Christian person in the wedding industry who isn’t aware of these ambushes should be, and could reply with something like, “Thank you for your inquiry, but my other commitments preclude my serving you at this time.”


12 posted on 07/11/2019 4:58:00 AM PDT by Tax-chick (It's the guitar solo! Everybody polka!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Another obvious set-up. I’m sick to death of these people.


13 posted on 07/11/2019 5:00:46 AM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tench_Coxe
Actually, if I were a fag, that's what I'd do. I'd just go from store to store asking for a wedding dress for a fag wedding, and as soon as I heard the above response, file a lawsuit.

And then hope for an out of court settlement.

14 posted on 07/11/2019 5:01:16 AM PDT by LouAvul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pecos

There was a famous I Love Lucy episode about this.

If only Christian conservatives had a bit more of the devil in them, we’d probably be left alone by SJWs.


15 posted on 07/11/2019 5:02:16 AM PDT by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tench_Coxe

I thought that most businesses reserved the right to refuse service to anyone without giving specific reasons....or does this only apply in certain circumstances??


16 posted on 07/11/2019 5:02:57 AM PDT by oldtech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

OK, we’ve had just about enough of this - GET BACK IN THE DAMNED CLOSET!!


17 posted on 07/11/2019 5:04:02 AM PDT by Psalm 73 ("I will now proceed to entangle the entire area".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Democrats are evil scum.


18 posted on 07/11/2019 5:04:59 AM PDT by stinkerpot65 (Global warming is a Marxist lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
Geeze , I thought fags and lesbians were creative. No gay dressmakers? No Lesbian dressmakers?

The “offended” cake and dress buyer freaks are akin to staged auto accident scammers, looking for the next “accident” to occur.

19 posted on 07/11/2019 5:05:52 AM PDT by csvset (illegitimi non carborundum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom4US

I think it’s a set up, purposely done, and they knew ahead of time what the designers response would be.

http://dauxilly.com/about-2/


20 posted on 07/11/2019 5:07:21 AM PDT by CaptainK ('No collusion, no obstruction, he's a leaker')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson