Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FEC chair responds to Trump saying he'd accept foreign intel on opponent: 'It is illegal'
The Hill ^ | 06/13/19 | Rebecca Klar

Posted on 06/13/2019 6:10:38 PM PDT by yesthatjallen

Federal Election Commission (FEC) Chairwoman Ellen Weintraub said Thursday it is illegal to accept foreign assistance during elections after President Trump publicly suggested he would accept foreign intelligence on opponents.

"I would not have thought that I needed to say this," Weintraub tweeted Thursday with her statement.

"Let me make something 100 percent clear to the American public and anyone running for public office: It is illegal for any person to solicit, accept, or receive anything of value from a foreign national in connection with a U.S. election," Weintraub said.

In an interview with ABC News Wednesday, Trump suggested he would accept dirt on an opponent offered by a foreign country.

Doubling down on why that's unconstitutional, Weintraub said "this is not a novel concept," adding that "our Founding Fathers sounded the alarm about 'foreign Interference, Intrigue, and Influence.' "

"They knew that when foreign governments seek to influence American politics, it is always to advance their own interests, not America's," she said.

Any political campaign that does receive such an offer should report it to the FBI, she added.

Trump said in the ABC interview he would "maybe go to the FBI" if he received information about an opponent from a foreign government.

Trump’s comments faced strong pushback from Democrats and some Republicans.

The FEC is an independent regulatory agency whose purpose is to enforce campaign finance law. Weintraub was appointed by former President George W. Bush and has served as commissioner since 2002.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: deepstate; fec; foreignintel; stephanopoulos; trump; trumpgsinterview; trumpinterview
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-144 next last
To: vigilence

Trump better not be seen reading any foreign newspapers.

And, is this another good reason for the citizenship question on the census? Gotta know if it’s legal for pols to receive dirt.


41 posted on 06/13/2019 6:31:47 PM PDT by FirstFlaBn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

It is hammertime...sledghammer time...I hope he floods the internet with a list of how obama and clinton should be charged. Hit back with overwhelming force...otherwise the punyboystephie interview was a mistake...but I the he’s shrewder than that.


42 posted on 06/13/2019 6:32:21 PM PDT by CincyRichieRich (Her Heinous! I am so stealing that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Hillary commissioned Britisher Steele’s fake dossier.

LOCK HER UP!


43 posted on 06/13/2019 6:34:13 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Trump 2020 - Re-Elect the M*****F***er!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
Seems they forgot about all the Chinese funded, campaign money the Clintons collected from their bundlers like Yah-Lin "Charlie" Trie, Johnny Chung, John Huang, James Riady, Maria Hsia, and Ted Sioeng. That's only the ones that got caught. How many more were there that went under the radar?

The Clinton creed: "So many foreign entities to get money from...so little time to do it."

44 posted on 06/13/2019 6:35:35 PM PDT by mass55th ("Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway." ~~ John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

And Stephanopolis thinks said dirt should be reported to the FBI of all people? In the immortal words of John McEnroe, “YOU CAN NOT BE SERIOUS”!


45 posted on 06/13/2019 6:35:50 PM PDT by vigilence (Vigilence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
Then the FEC can fine Hillary Clinton and Perkins Coie and Fusion GPS for creating the Steele Dossier.
46 posted on 06/13/2019 6:36:56 PM PDT by Widget Jr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

This is exactly the public reply the POTUS was trolling for.
Now, when the SHTF, he can just point to what these morons have put out in writing.


47 posted on 06/13/2019 6:37:28 PM PDT by lgjhn23 (It's easy to be liberal when you're dumber than a box of rocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MAGAthon

Perkins Cole. How convenient


48 posted on 06/13/2019 6:37:36 PM PDT by Long Jon No Silver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

So, what if the information they have is Bernie Sanders spent his honeymoon in the USSR. She that be reported to the FBI?

What if someone’s kid stole oranges from a street vendor? Should that be reported?


49 posted on 06/13/2019 6:38:17 PM PDT by McGavin999 (Border security without a wall is like having a Ring doorbell without a doorw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

FEC just admitted that the russiagate hoax was illegal for Hillary and Co...


50 posted on 06/13/2019 6:43:50 PM PDT by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

I’d like to see the FEC chair provide the legal reference to his BS claim.


51 posted on 06/13/2019 6:44:54 PM PDT by CodeToad ( Hating on Trump is hating on me and Americans!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

The key here is what the phrase “something of value” means.

I would argue it means something of *monetary* value. Not intellectual value.

Is something that’s at least potentially truthful information harmful? To whom. The US government or to the opponent in question?

I’d argue the latter. Which is not criminal! It’s only criminal if it could be harmful to the US, as a country! Not if it’s only harmful to a political opponent! How is it “criminal” to get dirt on a political opponent? “Criminal” to who, in who’s opinion? The opponent in question!?

It’s ridiculous!


52 posted on 06/13/2019 6:45:27 PM PDT by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

More groundwork laid for when the trap door slams shut.


53 posted on 06/13/2019 6:45:32 PM PDT by Wilderness Conservative (Nature is the ultimate conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Reagan80

“Trump is setting them up.”

Yes, he is. They’re all barking mad about his statement and he is about to use it against them. He is far smarter than to just say what he did.


54 posted on 06/13/2019 6:46:04 PM PDT by CodeToad ( Hating on Trump is hating on me and Americans!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

But, but, when Al Gore accepted Chinese money for his campaign, he said there was no legal controlling authority.


55 posted on 06/13/2019 6:47:09 PM PDT by PhiloBedo (You gotta roll with the punches, and get with what's real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad
There's a U.S. statute in a footnote at the bottom of the document.

Of course, there is nothing in the statute that defines a "thing of value" to mean unsolicited information that doesn't cost anything. In fact, defining a "thing of value" to include information with no measurable monetary value is a direct violation of the First Amendment.

56 posted on 06/13/2019 6:50:57 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Knowledge makes a man unfit to be a slave." -- Frederick Douglass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

I’m sorry, does this mean the FEC is investigating the Steele Report?

Or does it just mean that liberals can do it with impunity, then use it to try to push through a coup?


57 posted on 06/13/2019 6:51:18 PM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

I thought it was illegal to pay for foreign intel on an opponent. Now the dems just use our own intelligence agencies for free to spy on opponents.


58 posted on 06/13/2019 6:52:46 PM PDT by McCarthysGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Weintaub was very disingenuous setting up the straw man of receiving something of value which was not the question to Trump. The question was about receiving info on an unsolicited basis. The law does not require the President to cover his ears in such case. Nothing illegal about it and she knows that but maybe she is just stupid enough not to have a clue as to the distinction.


59 posted on 06/13/2019 6:58:45 PM PDT by chuckee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Its All Over Except ...

“So if an ambassador or foreign head sitting across from the president (in front of the press) leans over, the president has no idea what he or she is about to do, and that person whispers dirt on another candidate in Trump’s ear, that is illegal?

Huh?”

Your suppose to tell the FBI so they can spend 3 years and millions of dollars accusing people of doing things that are not verified or illegal.


60 posted on 06/13/2019 6:59:02 PM PDT by dgbrown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-144 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson