Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Someone Please Remind the Defense Department Who is President
Townhall.com ^ | June 1, 2019 | Mytheos Holt

Posted on 06/01/2019 4:19:27 AM PDT by Kaslin

President Trump’s disruptive style of politics was never going to be an easy sell in Washington. In a city where ossified norms are treated like monuments to American politics’ former glory, the president’s rebellious, smash the idols style, to say nothing of the fact that his agenda aimed to smash all the idols of DC groupthink, was anything but an obvious fit. Making the process even more difficult was the fact that any administration will have its policy defined by its personnel, and the number of personnel available who could both pass a Senate confirmation, and who would be willing and able to implement a Trumpian agenda, were vanishingly small. 

Obviously, President Trump couldn’t do everything himself, so he compromised and brought in people who sort of looked like the kinds of people he’d fill his administration with. Maybe. If you squinted. And to give the president credit, as his administration has gone on, he has become wiser about his choice of people, to the point that now his administration is actually changing not just the rules of the Washington game, but also the norms surrounding policy, though perhaps slower than people would like.

However, even as the Justice Department, State Department, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Health and Human Services, etc, have trended Trumpian over the past few years, one extremely important part of his administration has seemingly never made peace with which president they serve under. I’m talking about the Department of Defense.

And in fairness, that shouldn’t be a surprise. Trump’s initial choice to run the Defense Department was the universally respected James “Mad Dog” Mattis who, despite being by all accounts a gifted warrior and scholar, positively crawled with unease about serving under Trump. Some accounts even claim that Mattis was planning to mount a primary challenge to the president, and there are more than a few prepared to believe that Mattis penned the infamous anonymous New York Times op ed claiming that Trump had to be constrained by his own administration due to lack of character. When Mattis storomed out of the administration over President Trump’s plan to fulfill his campaign promise to withdraw from Syria, it was hardly a surprise, and for Trump supporters, it was a welcome reprieve.

But it wasn’t just the Syrian conflict where Mattis wanted the Trump administration to pursue a strategy that arguably emboldened its enemies while wasting American military resources. That distinction also belongs to his aborted attempt to hand Amazon the keys to all of the Defense Department’s intelligence resources, seemingly without even considering other options. Granted, Amazon may still get the keys to that kingdom, possibly due to bribing Pentagon officials, but at least they have had to fight an actual open bidding process, and may yet lose out to Microsoft. Mattis, on the other hand, was so bedazzled after one meeting with Jeff Bezos that he nearly gave the company the contract outright. It says a lot that Mattis could be so besotted with the man who owns a newspaper whose mission appears to be to attack his own boss, but leave that be.

Mattis may be gone, but his former deputy and now successor, Patrick Shanahan, gives no indicator of walking away from the interventionist, spendthrift ways of Mattis himself. Shanahan has already signed onto the ill-starred military escalation against Iran, for example. And despite President Trump’s campaign trail criticism of the F-35 joint strike fighter program, the DoD is still pursuing the 20-year, $1.5 trillion money sink. To give just a little context, the F-35 is supposed to be an “invisible” fighter with more advanced navigation technology than any previous plane used by the US military. What it actually is, is an unwieldy, unflyable mess, whose management and logistics software is so bad that pilots and training instructors have stopped using it. But to give the illusion that “all is well and there is nothing to see here,” pilots are made to say and pretend they use it, then manually re-enter by hand into old legacy systems everything they have done a second time, lest their planes get no proper maintenance. Pilots who fly the F-35 report severe pain and nausea after the fact, and in order to fix the plane’s problems with weight, Lockheed Martin, the F-35’s manufacturers, have stripped out essential safety equipment. To call it the Ford Pinto of fighter jets is unfair to the Pinto.

To be fair to Shanahan, President Trump has sounded confused about the F-35 at times, though that may be the president’s salesman’s instinct at work, given that Japan has expressed interest in buying the plane, and President Trump is not one to pass up business for American manufacturers. But even if the president wants to encourage the sales of US products, there’s no reason for his own administration to fall for the pitch. 

Either way, these examples demonstrate a troubling trend within Trump’s defense department: namely, a twin fixation on American military intervention and on spending money on counterproductive, dangerous, and wasteful technology that actually does little to improve the safety of everyday Americans. These sops to defense contractors may have been the norm in pre-Trump Washington, but there’s precious little reason for the disrupter-in-chief’s Pentagon to be running the kind of $640 toilet seat-style spending that characterized past administrations. Someone please remind America’s defense apparatus who’s president, because maybe if they can get that through their skulls, they might also remember whose tax dollars they work for in the first place.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: dod; presidenttrump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 06/01/2019 4:19:27 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Mytheos Holt a.k.a. - Eeyore the “Donkey Boy”


2 posted on 06/01/2019 4:24:22 AM PDT by Delta 21 (Be strong & prosper, be weak & die! Stay true.... ~~ Donald J. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Sorry. But the political reality is that after two and a half years, Trump still does not firmly control the levers of power. He has yet to purge the bulk of the Obama acolytes and commissars from Justice, State, CIA and the Pentagon. Face it. The “resistance” of the swamp is fierce and so far very persistent. BTW he is getting almost no help from Republicans. If they were smart , they would look to what has happened to the Conservative Party in Britain which similarly refused to act on the will of the people.

Trump needs to make some arrests of the people who tried to rig the election and prevent him from taking office, hire people who know how to purge these agencies, build the wall and inspire the American people. Otherwise the Left and the globalists will destroy the American nation. Much is at stake.


3 posted on 06/01/2019 4:44:08 AM PDT by allendale (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allendale

Because conservatism became a Boomer cargo cult of griping, our “leaders” lead us into it while they cashed out.


4 posted on 06/01/2019 4:47:01 AM PDT by junta ("Peace is a racket", testimony from crime boss Barrack Hussein Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I wonder if this isn’t really testament to the brutal ways of the Democrats when they’re in power because Bathhouse Barry wiped out senior officers and bureaucrats who didn’t bow down to him whereas President Trump seems to put up with a great deal of insubordination, so they figure to keep doing Obama’s bidding to avoid being purged in the future when Trump is gone and the RATS return to power.


5 posted on 06/01/2019 5:08:28 AM PDT by Dahoser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dahoser

I think you have a point.


6 posted on 06/01/2019 5:10:38 AM PDT by Chickensoup (Voter ID for 2020!! Leftists totalitarian fascists appear to be planning to eradicate conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

bkmk


7 posted on 06/01/2019 5:10:40 AM PDT by sauropod (Yield to sin, and experience chastening and sorrow; yield to God, and experience joy and blessing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allendale

“Trump needs to make some arrests of the people who tried to rig the election”

Amen. Otherwise the next election can be rigged in just the same way. (There are 3.5 million more registered voters than there are adults in the USA...)


8 posted on 06/01/2019 5:13:17 AM PDT by CondorFlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: allendale
"Trump needs to make some arrests of the people who tried to rig the election and prevent him from taking office, hire people who know how to purge these agencies, build the wall and inspire the American people. Otherwise the Left and the globalists will destroy the American nation. Much is at stake."

____________

And find Bathhouse Barry to see if he can defend his Italian, Australian, and British spying.

9 posted on 06/01/2019 5:15:02 AM PDT by a little elbow grease (... to err is human, to admit it divine ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: allendale

Deep State is composed of career bureaucrats. There are only about 4,000 political appointees to oversee the federal workforce. It is a thin veneer. And many of the political appointee jobs are filled by careerists. For example, there are only two political jobs in the CIA, i.e., the Director and her Deputy. Only one in the FBI.

The career bureaucrats cannot be “purged.”


10 posted on 06/01/2019 5:57:39 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kabar

“The career bureaucrats cannot be “purged.””

True but they can be assigned to meaningless drudge work.


11 posted on 06/01/2019 6:04:18 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kabar
The career bureaucrats cannot be “purged.”

Everyone in FedGov can be fired. There are mechanism to do that.

12 posted on 06/01/2019 6:04:32 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: central_va

My solution is easy. Make them resign.

A TAD assignment for three or four months to the new office in Severeboondocks Nigeria or Russia or Moldovia should induce resignation


13 posted on 06/01/2019 6:07:44 AM PDT by bert ( (KE. NP. N.C. +12)There were Democrat espionage operations on Republican candidates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

You forgot the fact that political correctness still rules the Defense Department and that it will cost us dearly in the next war. Women still are in the Infantry and other close in combat positions, being given Ranger tabs and other formerly prestigious accomplishments, crashing ships into ships using pregnancy to escape tough assignments.


14 posted on 06/01/2019 6:24:12 AM PDT by Midwesterner53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

I spent 36 years working for the federal government and was a member of the SES. It is extremely difficult to fire a federal employee. It is a long, drawn out process.

For example, if you want to fire someone for poor performance, you must produce documented evidence and show that you have conducted counseling sessions to show that you tried to help the employee improve his performance. The annual personal evaluation must demonstrate a long term record of poor performance. The federal labor unions provide legal representation. It consumes lots of time and effort for the supervisor.

There are very few federal employees who are fired. I only was involved in two instances in 36 years. It took more than a year in both cases.


15 posted on 06/01/2019 6:27:15 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: bert
Flag Officers are in essence political appointees because the President expects them to toe the Presidents line. Trump has not been in office long enough to get rid of Obama’s Generals and Admirals.

You have the right idea however, anyone opposing the Trump agenda for the military gets orders to sunset postings. Let their careers die on the vine. By the end of Trumps second term we will see more lions and fewer lambs in charge. At least that is the hope.

16 posted on 06/01/2019 6:27:44 AM PDT by OldGoatCPO (No Caitiff Choir of Angles will sing for me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kabar

If you want to save the country you do it. They can be transferred to Ice Station Zebra while we process them out.


17 posted on 06/01/2019 6:30:30 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

What a bitter disappointment “Maddog” was - I’m so glad that’s behind us!


18 posted on 06/01/2019 6:31:01 AM PDT by rockrr ( Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

They stay on the payroll and you have one less productive employee. And there are legal remedies that are available to the employee to challenge any reassignment or change in duties.

There are two kinds of federal employees: Those who have rank determined by position and those with rank in person. Those with rank in person have an up or out system.


19 posted on 06/01/2019 6:33:59 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: central_va

LOL. You haven’t a clue.


20 posted on 06/01/2019 6:35:11 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson