Posted on 05/15/2019 8:54:11 AM PDT by jazusamo
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham held a press conference Wednesday morning to announce new legislation, the Secure and Protect Act of 2019, aimed at fixing the current border crisis and strengthening security.
"Today I'm going to introduce legislation designed to deal with the crisis at our border," Graham said. “We have a perfect storm brewing at the border because of a series of broken and outdated laws related to asylum and children.”
"What I'm trying to do is stop the flow coming from Central America to regain control of our border and stop a humanitarian crisis that I think is just going to get worse over time. One of the most important things I can stress to you is that people are trying to get caught. They're not avoiding getting caught," Graham continued. "So when we talk about building a wall as Republicans, that makes sense to stop illegal entry into the country, try to direct people into areas where we have a better chance of apprehending them. That doesn't work when the goal of the person is to find a Border Patrol agent and turn yourself in."
Graham addressed calls from lawmakers to give additional funding to Central American countries, arguing it won't stop the problem. The real problem with the current crisis are the loopholes in U.S. immigration law.
"To those who want to give more money to Central America, it won't stop the problem. They're going to keep coming to the United States...no amount of money is going to stop people from coming," Graham said, noting he's in charge of foreign assistance on the Appropriations Committee. "No matter how high the wall will be built, no matter how many drones you have, no matter how many agents you put at the border, they'll keep coming because they want to get caught."
The legislation, which is 11-pages long, allows federal immigration authorities to keep families together in detention centers for 100 days, allows for unaccompanied alien children to be swiftly returned home to their families, reforms the asylum system and clarifies asylum standards for "credible fear" in order to cut down on rampant abuse. Those seeking asylum will be required to do so in a U.S. consulate or embassy in Central America or Mexico.
"No more asylum claims at the U.S. border if you're from Central America," Graham said.
Currently, families and unaccompanied minors can only be held for 20 days. Because of the lengthy processing backlog for asylum seekers, they are released into American communities.
"If you're an unaccompanied minor from Central America, under our law we can only hold you 20 days at DHS, then we turn you over to labor HHS. Ninety-eight percent of the unaccompanied minors who make it to America from Central America never leave the United States. Families know this, word is out on the street in the n triangle countries that if your child can get here by themselves then the chance of them staying in America is almost 100 percent. We are incentivizing a horrible journey," Graham said. "Under our law if you come as a unit, family unit, and you have a minor child, we can only hold the family for 20 days because we don't want to separate the family. We don't have enough detention bed space. We release the entire family after 20 days. So word is out on the street in Central America that if you bring a minor child with you, your chance of getting deported goes to almost zero. Your hearing date is years away and we release you inside the country and that's the goal of coming. This legislation is going to deal with the problem."
Graham's legislation also calls for the hiring of 500 additional immigration judges to get through the 900,000 case asylum backlog.
More on asylum abuse numbers from the White House:
-On average, out of every 100 aliens subject to expedited removal who claim a fear of persecution, only about 12 will ultimately be granted asylum.
-Around half of all aliens who make a credible fear claim and are subsequently placed in removal proceedings do not actually apply for asylum.
-The number of aliens who do not show up to court and are ordered removed in absentia has soared, with 17,200 removal orders issued in absentia in the first quarter of fiscal year (FY) 2019.
You can watch Graham's remarks below: VIDEO AT LINK.
I’m sure Vlad would welcome them.
I read an article here the other day where Trump was mulling the idea of deporting IA’s with removal orders. Why is he even HESITATING?
Wall is to stop illegal entry of all sorts.
This is needed because asylum law says on US soil. In many places secure fence/wall is set back from actual legal boundary. Meaning they can be on our soil before they get to the fence/wall.
I believe that for reasons of practicality of construction, the Wall (fence, whatever) is often not exactly on the border, it is a little inside the border. Some way to make that land inhospitable, but not inhumane, is needed.
As for increasing the detention time to 100 days, where the heck are we going to put these people?
Graham’s bill has some good points, but much more must be done to turn off the “magnet”.
we must develop solution using less-than-lethal force and the wall to stop them from stepping into the country.
Cheese and Rice.
Like RR said....”The most terrifying words in the English language are: I’m from the government and I’m here to help”.
Each of these walking a-holes ignore the obvious, and thereby eff with us.
Haha - parallel thinking in sequential posts! You beat me! (My #44)
So.... How do we “work” that on the border crossers?
Sounds great, but how many neo-con GOP Senators will find an excuse to not vote on it.
This has zero chance in the House and 40% chance in the Senate.
Graham knows this but he is using this to get donors for his re-election.
Just so I understand this correctly ... y'all are in favor of shooting people for crossing the border? That's cold-blooded. Seriously.
Are you serious, Clark?
Look, do country’s have borders?
Ok, should country’s have borders?
Point being, there are no country’s without borders.
Please answer the first two questions.
I will address your concern once I understand what your border stance is.
Thank you!
What does that have to do with shooting people?
As I said before ... I am all about border security and an immigration system that actually works and is enforced as intended. But shooting border crossers?!
Are you ok for someone to enter your home, unannounced? Do you lock your doors? Do you have a door, or a wall in your home?
Cut to the chase. What would you do if someone entered your apartment/home, unwanted?
A) Invite them in
B) Ask them to leave
If the answer is A, do I have to pay for their care?
If the answer is B, what if they just ignored you and moved their family in?
We the people. If we want to keep our country and if the legislation is written right...we need to HAMMER Congress.
We the people have done that every time Congress tries to give amnesty. Just depends on how bad we want to keep our country.
Point taken. But - at least in my state - it is legal and warranted to use deadly force if necessary to protect my property. Is it legal - and moral - to open fire on a person crossing the border?
Not as a citizen. Our job is to get Congress to pass the proper laws that protect the citizens. It is the duty of the POTUS to enforce The Constitution and protect the USA. We are being invaded by foreign people. Invaded. Agree or disagree?
An invasion of numbers ... not military force.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.