Posted on 05/14/2019 11:16:07 PM PDT by Morgana
FULL TITLE: 'Women's rights are under attack': Nancy Pelosi leads backlash against 'cruel' Alabama abortion ban bill, as Alyssa Milano rails against the 25 men who voted in favor of the bill
Democrats and abortion advocates have reacted with swift fury to a bill passed in Alabama that would ban abortion in nearly all cases.
Alabama's state Senate passed a bill on Tuesday to outlaw nearly all abortions, creating exceptions only to protect the mother's health, as part of a multistate effort to have the U.S. Supreme Court reconsider a woman's constitutional right to an abortion.
The country's strictest abortion bill was previously approved by the Alabama House of Representatives and will now go to Republican Governor Kay Ivey, who has withheld comment on whether she would sign but is generally a strong opponent of abortion.
'Women's rights are under attack,' wrote House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a California Democrat, in a tweet. 'This relentless and cruel Republican assault on women's health is designed to force a court battle to destroy Roe v. Wade. Democrats will be ready to defend health care and women's reproductive freedom.'
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
>
>>
Someone should remind em their choice ended at the affirmation of voluntary copulation and subsequent donation of 23 chromosomes.
>>
Rape victims did not voluntarily copulate.
>
Thanks for the “clarification” there, Cpt. Obvious *SMH*
There are ZERO rights ‘attacked’ via my original statement.
I suspect though, that the rape charge vs. abortion test case (”She only *claimed* rape since she NEEDED an abortion...” and the cops\hospital staffs would break the law to back her up) wouldn’t be too long after govt, correctly, gets its nose out from under the tent.
I suspect though, that the rape charge vs. abortion test case (She only *claimed* rape since she NEEDED an abortion... and the cops\hospital staffs would break the law to back her up) wouldnt be too long after govt, correctly, gets its nose out from under the tent.
Sally gets pregnant, doesn’t want a baby ruining her figure.
She claims rape in order to get an abortion. But the hospital admittance clerk says Sally will have to identify her rapist to the police. Sally really wants the abortion so she falsely accuses Bob of rape.
Bob is terrified. The police advise Sally that if Bob is found innocent of rape, Sally will have to serve out the prison sentence Bob would have received.
Sally decides she wasn’t raped and carries the baby to term. When baby Tony is born, Sally actually bonds and keeps the baby, suing Bob for child support. Bob is pissed that Sally was willing to send him to prison, and skips out. Sally goes on welfare, and starts looking for another baby daddy.
In what fantasy world does this happen?
Hey, come up with what you think will happen?
These people’s brains are back assward. The sadness is the murdered innocents, not that a woman will not prefer to murder an innocent. Did they stop making birth control of the normal type?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.