I have the sinking feeling that the courts will NEVER find in favor of the baby.
Good for Ohio, but the meddling democrats will never let it stand.
A court challenge will be coming in 3..2..1..
Shoulda waited till Trump had one more Supreme Court pick to hopefully ensure the law stays. We don’t need any more precedents not in our favor.
Nice, but it’s over for the baby. The raging feminazis have won in most areas, and will sue to win in the remaining states.
There is NO doubt that the developing baby is human. It is totally unnatural for a parent to kill that developing baby. No matter what the justification, that will always be true.
Refusing to give the baby a name, or calling him a “foetus” changes nothing.
OHIO PING!
Ohio Governor Signs Heartbeat Bill, But Will It Survive The Courts?
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3741448/posts
Please let me know if you want on or off the Ohio Ping list.
It will force the issue back to the SCOTUS. They will have to decide if they are to “jigger” the Roe-v-Wade ruling, altering “viability” as a standard, or will they conclude as Scalia did that abortion should be, and can be, regulated by the states.
If the “pro-choice” folks want abortion to be “constitutional” they need to do it the right way, if they can - put it in the Constitution via an amendment. I think they never tried that because they doubted they could succeed in that, and I think they could not succeed in that now.
From article - “Both sides are considered extreme, and too much so for the American public who, while they find abortion to be “morally wrong” are generally in favor of restricting it after the first trimester, or 12-weeks.”
Abortion is one of those absolute from on high “laws of nature and nature’s God.” It isn’t subject to vote or polling.
Modern science has pretty much resolved that life begins at conception.
23 pairs of chromosomes from mom and same from dad.....the two have become one. Two lives are now in the balance with all the rights thereof.
Rape? Incest? Irrelevant. The child had no control over parentage. To argue otherwise is the basest from of “blood guilt”.....and we can’t permit that crap to get a foothold.
Birth defect? Do not presume the province of God. His will, not ours in matters of life. Again, letting man/woman pick who lives of dies based on health or quality of life without a veto permitted the subject...can’t open that Pandora’s Box, either.
Lastly, the ever rare health risk to mom. That and only that decision should fall to the woman. Her conscience on how God will treat a mother who chooses self over her own child. But still her decision.
Society has always praised selfless sacrifice of one’s life, the law has never compelled it that I can find.
We must do the right thing and let God take care of the rest. That’s what Ohio is doing. I’m proud to be a Buckeye!