Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

It will force the issue back to the SCOTUS. They will have to decide if they are to “jigger” the Roe-v-Wade ruling, altering “viability” as a standard, or will they conclude as Scalia did that abortion should be, and can be, regulated by the states.

If the “pro-choice” folks want abortion to be “constitutional” they need to do it the right way, if they can - put it in the Constitution via an amendment. I think they never tried that because they doubted they could succeed in that, and I think they could not succeed in that now.


8 posted on 04/12/2019 6:16:52 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Wuli

The nation has one last chance to stop the genocide of pre-separation infants. I don’t know anyone who’s real optimistic that all of those “conservative” SC judges are really that. I have suspicions that some of them are fakes who don’t have a deep, fundamental belief that all lives are equally deserving of protection. Whichever way it goes, there’s a conservative majority now. Any more conservatives won’t really matter; it’s just as likely will get an elitist phony. But there will be clarity. If the nation doesn’t mend its ways and embrace life, we’re not worth saving.


10 posted on 04/12/2019 6:40:20 AM PDT by grania ("We're all just pawns in their game")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson