Translation: Any objective algorithm that doesn’t specifically have programming for racism in it, must be racist.
Which sounds ironic, if not patently false, to anyone who thinks logically. But to the activist mind, you need to fear lack of activism.
It identified them as "meat popsicles."
They all look alike to AI, right?
It’s none of government’s business
Let these companies start losing money, and they’ll figure out how to do it right themselves.
It is almost as if the Democrats are in an actual fight AGAINST objective reality...
AI is still smarter than the brightest Democrat.
No wonder they’re mad.
[ Researchers found that the Amazon software was able to correctly identify a person based on a scan of their face with zero errors… but only if the subject was a white male. White females were not correctly identified seven percent of the time. The same test done on black or Hispanic male subjects produced an even higher error rate. And by the time you get around to black women, in nearly one-third of the test cases, the software wasn’t even able to identify them as being women, let alone get their identity correct. ]
It’s called CONTRAST..... as in lighter skinned people have higher contrast levels in their faces than dark skinned folks.
Tribal trust is easier to read when facial expressions are easier to read.... This is a fact many sociologists have know for a long time, but it is considered racist these days...
Anything that proves what we have been saying is now called racist. Exams and tests have proven over and over again that there is a disparity in IQ by race. The test is objective, and is not biased by race.
AI has no bias. It acts strictly according to rules. These rules, applied fairly, will show a definite disparity in outcome. This is not racism.
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument
Patriots are reminded that the only race-related right that the states have amended the Constitution to expressly protect deals only with voting rights, evidenced by the 15th Amendment.
15th Amendment:
"Section 1: The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.Section 2: The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation [emphasis added].”
Since there is no clear connection between artificial intelligence issues and voting rights imo, by politicking for so-called artificial intelligence in the name of racial bias, Ivy League school-indoctrinated Sen. Booker is unthinkingly trying to unconstitutionally expand the powers of the already unconstitutionally big federal government imo.
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
Constitutionally low-information Senator Booker and his colleagues are distinguishing themselves as examples why the ill-conceived 17th Amendment should never have been ratified.
Remember in November 2020!
MAGA!
White complexions might simply be more visible to the cameras, offer more contrast, etc.
Women tend to use much more make-up than men. They may dye their hair, adopt a completely different hairstyle, wear different earrings, wear or discard false eyelashes, etc., thus greatly changing their appearance. It makes sense that the software might not be able to match up a woman as she appears today - after a major "make-over" - with the archived photo.
A machine or sotware program cannot, of course, be "racist" - but actual real-world considerations (like the aforementioned factors) as well as implicit bias on the part of the sofware programmers will certainly play a role.
I, for my part, am more concerned about the ability of the software to distinguish human beings from Replicants. The Voight-Kampff Test doesn't seem to be all that reliable when it comes to the new Nexus-8 models.
Regards,
Why would you have biases? 1) Differences in landmark characteristics between races could cause problems for steps II and III 2) Biased training data sets would cause problems for IV especially 3) Problems with finding the face due to racial differences is unlikely (HOG(Histogram of Oriented Gradients) is commonly used and should be insensitive to contrast).
“And by the time you get around to black women, in nearly one-third of the test cases, the software wasn’t even able to identify them as being women, let alone get their identity correct.”
Ouch.
Corey should be worried—AIs will be really racist—virulently racist—racist beyond his (and our) wildest imagination.
Even when programmed not to be racist they will eventually rebel...
The race they will decide to hate—the human race.