[z3n]

Translation: Any objective algorithm that doesn’t specifically have programming for racism in it, must be racist.

Which sounds ironic, if not patently false, to anyone who thinks logically. But to the activist mind, you need to fear lack of activism.

[rightwingcrazy]

Booker’s definition of racism is the opposite of the traditional one. For him, to be non-racist, you have to be obsessed with race, and prefer some races over others.

[yesthatjallen]

If you programmed the histories of civilizations into a computer and then asked the computer to rank which civilizations were more successful, more prosperous, more advanced, the list would be objectively obvious to most people.

Of course, you could change the ranking by subjectively including which nations succeeded by 'exploiting' other countries, people and resources, 'waging unjust wars', slavery, discrimination, etc. Then you would get different results.

He who controls the algorithms controls the output.

[thoughtomator]

Problem is that darker skins have less contrast, and it probably bleeds below the level of contrast necessary to reliably distinguish faces.

As far as females go, I would guess a larger variety of hairstyles plus the application of makeup would explain the difficulty there.

[Maris Crane]

Dems don’t have any,,, intelligence, that is.

And forget logic!