Posted on 03/30/2019 2:48:23 PM PDT by Innovative
Need Congress to limit the authority of Article one judges under its constitutional checks and balances on its own creations. But first have to win a majority of both Houses that is: GOP, pro-American and pro-Trump. Would love to impeach some Obama judges, but doubt we can get enough Senators in time to do so. But we could shackle their power after the next elections.
So let’s get this straight, Obama’s executive orders and executive regulations are not “illegal” but simply reversing them is?
It is time any POTUS starts telling judges who think THEY make federal policy that their orders are going to be ignored, and THEY can try to appeal their writ, to Congress. If Congress writes legislation, and the president approves it, then there’s a law to be respected, but that is how legislation is done, not from the judicial bench.
Ok, so get rid of the bitch.
In most of these cases, the judges use the “Administrative Procedure Act” to stop Executive Orders or Executive agency rules and regulations.
Their favorite “legal weapon” is to claim that the President or another government executive has been “arbitrary or capricious.”
I don’t remember where the Constitution gives federal judges the right to overturn executive orders. Am I missing something?
There needs to be a rule that if you get overturned by the Supreme Court 3 three times you lose your job for cause of incompetence. This I feel will solve this issue.
“The wording of President Obama’s 2015 and 2016 withdrawals indicates that he intended them to extend indefinitely, and therefore be revocable only by an act of Congress,”
What a precedent! Do you suppose Trump’s E.O.s will be treated the same?
“Gleason ruled Friday that the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act only allows a president to withdraw lands from consideration by the Interior Department for leasing — not to revoke a prior withdrawal.”
It is possible that she is correct on the law but it certainly seems counterintuitive. It should be easily enough verified if she is correct as to that point.
If the law IS written as she has indicated, it would seem to be unconstitutional. Allowing one President to invoke something with the stroke of a pen that another President cannot rescind without an act of Congress would seem unlikely to pass Constitutional muster. unlikely
You can say that again....
As this case shows, DISTRICT JUDGES ARE IMPORTANT. There’s no excuse for the Republicans to be allowing over 100 District Judge positions (of a total of 667 Authorized District Judge positions) to be sitting VACANT.
Excellent point,
I must be very stupid but how come an EO by one president is o.k. but not by another? They are either both legit or both bogus. Right?
I don’t remember where the Constitution gives federal judges the right to overturn executive orders. Am I missing something?
—
I would love the answer to your question.
Is there a lawyer in the house who can answer this?
Thanks.
Under the Constitution, Congress has lots of tools to rein in the corrupt and arrogant judiciary. We need to elect Congressmen who will use those tools.
Judges are supposed to rule on law, nothing more. What lawsuit is this a response to? Then explain the legal reasoning behind the ruling.
This BS of just “declaring” something to be illegal without citing specifics as an answer to a lawsuit is lawlessness. They’re literally making up law as they wish. Surely this is criminal?
...we can always ignore, they can’t enforce.
Must every single federal judge in the entire nation agree with an executive order for it to be lawful?
How come Obama's original executive order was lawful, yet Trump's overturning of said eo is unlawful? BLACK PRIVILEGE?
Dear Paul Ryan:
You did nothing to preserve the Republican majority in the House. You did nothing to support President Trump. You did nothing regarding rogue judges.
I hold you responsible for not impeaching all of these judges who ignore the Constitution and legislate from the bench.
Turd.
5.56mm
See post #29.
Better get used to it getting 10x worse, as we get to 2020.
Essentially, anything the Messiah Obastard did is sacrosanct and moral and must remain in effect forever.
Women...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.