Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fairfax accuser says consensual situation 'quickly turned into a sexual assault'
The Hill ^ | 02/06/19 | Rachel Frazin

Posted on 02/06/2019 1:09:21 PM PST by yesthatjallen

Vanessa Tyson, a professor who has accused Virginia Lt. Gov. Justin Fairfax (D) of sexual assault, issued her first statement Wednesday detailing her allegation against him.

“What began as consensual kissing quickly turned into a sexual assault," Tyson, a college professor from California, said in the statement. "Mr. Fairfax forced me to perform oral sex on him."

Tyson has accused Fairfax of sexually assaulting her at the 2004 Democratic National Convention in Boston. Fairfax has denied the accusation.

The lieutenant governor issued a statement earlier Wednesday maintaining that his interaction with Tyson was consensual.

“At no time did she express to me any discomfort or concern about our interactions, neither during that encounter nor doing the months following it, when she stayed in touch with me, nor the past fifteen years,” Fairfax said in the statement. “She in no way indicated that anything that had happened between us made her uncomfortable.”

The governor’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Tyson contradicted Fairfax’s denial, saying, “I cannot believe, given my obvious distress, that Mr. Fairfax thought this forced sexual act was consensual. To be very clear, I did not want to engage in oral sex with Mr. Fairfax and I never gave any form of consent.”

“I suffered from both deep humiliation and shame,” Tyson said, adding that she did not tell anyone for years.

She did approach The Washington Post with her story last year, but the paper said it did not publish her story because it could not find anyone to corroborate it.

Tyson is a professor of politics at Scripps College in California, although she is on fellowship at Stanford University this year. In addition to being a professor and author, Tyson advocates for sexual assault awareness and prevention, according to the Scripps College website.

She said in her statement that the allegations are not politically motivated and that she is a “proud Democrat.”

Tyson is represented by Katz, Marshall & Banks, the same law firm that represented Christine Blasey Ford, who accused Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh of assault last year. The firm did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The allegation against Fairfax surfaced after a photo was released Friday of Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam’s (D) medical school yearbook page that pictured a man dressed in blackface and another dressed in Ku Klux Klan robes.

Virginia Attorney General Mark Herring (D) on Wednesday also admitted to using blackface as a teenager, deepening the leadership crisis in the Commonwealth.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: California; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: california; dukeuniversity; justinfairfax; meredithwatson; metoo; muhdik; ralphnortham; sexualassault; vanessatyson; virginia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 02/06/2019 1:09:21 PM PST by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

The Post didn’t publish this because they couldn’t corroborate it. Yet they had no problem piling on against Kavanaugh.


2 posted on 02/06/2019 1:11:25 PM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

He said/she said.


3 posted on 02/06/2019 1:11:37 PM PST by FamiliarFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Sean Hannity read her victim statement on the air today. I believe her. As a man I cannot understand why she did not report that assault when it happened. But I’m a man, and I know a vast majority of rape and assault do not go to the police as they should.

However she did confide in her friends and others last year about what happened so this did not come out of the blue as a total surprise.


4 posted on 02/06/2019 1:13:34 PM PST by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

I think Fairfax’s best option at this point would be to come out as gay.


5 posted on 02/06/2019 1:14:07 PM PST by Joe 6-pack (Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Democracy dies in darkness, my ass. They forgot to explain that they are the f’ing umbrella!


6 posted on 02/06/2019 1:14:39 PM PST by NohSpinZone (First thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

The Post didn’t publish this because they couldn’t corroborate it. Yet they had no problem piling on against Kavanaugh.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

All women must be believed, right?


7 posted on 02/06/2019 1:14:52 PM PST by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

No, no. His best option would be to admit he wore black face in the 1980s.


8 posted on 02/06/2019 1:16:01 PM PST by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NohSpinZone

Democracy dies in darkness. Some might believe the compost thinks that is a great catchy slogan. When in actuality it is their objective and desire.


9 posted on 02/06/2019 1:17:15 PM PST by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

Or announce he’s transitioning to become a woman....


10 posted on 02/06/2019 1:17:36 PM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

They didn’t bother with it because the guy is a DEM; it’s as simple as that.


11 posted on 02/06/2019 1:20:23 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

They didn’t bother with it because the guy is a DEM; it’s as simple as that.


12 posted on 02/06/2019 1:20:23 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

Actually I think his best option would be to have a 2nd front door cut into his house.


13 posted on 02/06/2019 1:21:27 PM PST by bigbob (Trust Trump. Trust the Plan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NohSpinZone
The Truth Dies in the Washington Post
14 posted on 02/06/2019 1:21:54 PM PST by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Funny how they never mention AttackWatch.......


15 posted on 02/06/2019 1:26:55 PM PST by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Hoist on their own petard.


16 posted on 02/06/2019 1:28:20 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (You can't invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FamiliarFace

No way I’d shove my Johnson into an angry cavity with teeth.


17 posted on 02/06/2019 1:28:36 PM PST by sparklite2 (Don't mind me. I'm just a contrarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Sounds much like Cory Booker’s bathroom escapade, except that was a guy who made the accusation. That’s why Cory was so proud to announce that he had a girlfriend.


18 posted on 02/06/2019 1:29:05 PM PST by VanShuyten ("...that all the donkeys were dead. I know nothing as to the fate of the less valuable animals.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
Where are all the women who were up in arms against Kavanaugh?

Anyone want to go through the list of differences?

1) couldn't identify the House vs. knew *exactly* where it happened

2) touching over clothes alleged vs. oral-genital contact

3) accuser giving her name publicly UP FRONT rather than indirectly through a partisan legislator

4) accused in one case had passed NUMEROUS background checks with nothing similar on his record vs. (unknown?)

5) accuser of Kavanaugh part of all-out assault includin women dressed up as fictional characters, vs. released through a top law firm

6) accuser of Kavanaugh unavailable to committee (even though they were secretly in-state) vs. formal, specific press release

7) accuser of Kavanaugh during confirmation hearings vs. no particular political event

8) Kavanaugh received numerous testimonials in his favor from women who had worked with him for decades; vs. Fairfax quoted after accusation as saying "F*** that B***!"

On the other hand,

8) both accusers waited decades to come forward

9) both accusers are academic women from California

19 posted on 02/06/2019 1:36:16 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Sean Hannity read her victim statement on the air today. I believe her.

I do not believe her. But in a he said/she said, either one of them could be telling the truth. After the way they treated Kavanaugh though, I hope Fairfax gets thrown under the bus, and I hope she's lying to boot. That would be sweet!

20 posted on 02/06/2019 1:41:36 PM PST by Sans-Culotte (Time to get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson