Anyone want to go through the list of differences?
1) couldn't identify the House vs. knew *exactly* where it happened
2) touching over clothes alleged vs. oral-genital contact
3) accuser giving her name publicly UP FRONT rather than indirectly through a partisan legislator
4) accused in one case had passed NUMEROUS background checks with nothing similar on his record vs. (unknown?)
5) accuser of Kavanaugh part of all-out assault includin women dressed up as fictional characters, vs. released through a top law firm
6) accuser of Kavanaugh unavailable to committee (even though they were secretly in-state) vs. formal, specific press release
7) accuser of Kavanaugh during confirmation hearings vs. no particular political event
8) Kavanaugh received numerous testimonials in his favor from women who had worked with him for decades; vs. Fairfax quoted after accusation as saying "F*** that B***!"
On the other hand,
8) both accusers waited decades to come forward
9) both accusers are academic women from California
One more from the accused side of things:
Kavanaugh vehemently denied any contact with Ford (sexual or otherwise) & Fairfax CONFIRMED that “sex happened” when and where she said it happened.
[ Where are all the women who were up in arms against Kavanaugh? ]
Yes, that’s a bit odd, isn’t it?
Could it be the Democrats only do their dog and pony victim show for political reasons?
Nah, that couldn’t be it, could it?
I’ll be waiting for multiple instances of this story to run for weeks on Democrat Yahoo.
Any second now...should be any second now....