Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Scourge of Human Trafficking Cries out for another Appomattox
Project Real News ^ | January 18, 2019 | Timothy J. Dailey

Posted on 01/18/2019 2:50:51 PM PST by tjd1454

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 01/18/2019 2:50:51 PM PST by tjd1454
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tjd1454

Amazing article something has to be done to put an end to this modern-day slavery. Let’s hope Trump means what he says and is devoting the necessary law enforcement resources to finish the job.


2 posted on 01/18/2019 2:56:49 PM PST by flytrysk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tjd1454

“The bloodiest war that the United States ever fought did not take place on a foreign battlefield, but raged on American soil, as brother took up arms against brother over the issue of slavery.”

The opening sentence caught my attention.

If the South was fighting for slavery, who was fighting against slavery?


3 posted on 01/18/2019 3:00:41 PM PST by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tjd1454
President Trump just posted this on Twitter:

"Donald J. Trump ‏ Verified account

@realDonaldTrump 3m3 minutes ago

I will be making a major announcement concerning the Humanitarian Crisis on our Southern Border, and the Shutdown, tomorrow afternoon at 3 P.M., live from the @WhiteHouse.

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1086395559504764930

4 posted on 01/18/2019 3:00:55 PM PST by Tennessee Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tjd1454

The trafficking described above is a small price to pay for getting to stick our thumb in Trump’s eye and denying him a win. - Democrats


5 posted on 01/18/2019 3:02:52 PM PST by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tjd1454
The bloodiest war that the United States ever fought did not take place on a foreign battlefield, but raged on American soil, as brother took up arms against brother over the issue of slavery.

And here is this bullsh*t again. No, the war wasn't fought to stop slavery, the war was fought to stop states from getting away from the oppressive taxation and rule by Washington DC and their capitalist crony corruptocrats in New York.

Same thing going on today. Yes, the Washington/New York corruptocrats are still running things.

The first thing the North did in an attempt to stop the Southern states from leaving the control of Washington was to pass the Corwin Amendment, protecting slavery forever!

So stop feeding people the bullsh*t that anyone started a war to destroy slavery. They didn't.

6 posted on 01/18/2019 3:03:30 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flytrysk

Consider that there are women who would prefer to come to the US as a sex worker, than remain in places like Venezuela.


7 posted on 01/18/2019 3:06:44 PM PST by PapaBear3625 ("Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." -- Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

Had never heard of the Corwin Amendment.

Now I have.

Thanks.


8 posted on 01/18/2019 3:12:16 PM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tjd1454
The war began with the bombardment of Fort Sumter, South Carolina on April 12, 1861, and ended in the Spring of 1865, when Robert E. Lee surrendered the Confederate army to Ulysses S. Grant at Appomattox Courthouse.

The Texans who fought the Yankees--and won--at the Battle of Palmito Ranch on May 13, 1865 and the sailors aboard the Yankee whalers who were captured by the CSS Shenandoah that summer would have been amused to know that the war had already ended with Lee's surrender.

9 posted on 01/18/2019 3:13:06 PM PST by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeffersondem

Trick question?

The North, Republicans,etc


10 posted on 01/18/2019 3:14:05 PM PST by dirtymac (Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country! Now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tjd1454

The main problem with our current immigration policy isn’t the trafficking. It’s the effect on the people who are already here — the welfare expense, the loss of common language, the spread of dangerous and backward-looking religions, wage level depression, and environmental degredation. These problems would exist even if the illegals were not trafficked.


11 posted on 01/18/2019 3:21:34 PM PST by Socon-Econ (adical Islam,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

I wish these folks would simply STFU


12 posted on 01/18/2019 3:23:27 PM PST by wardaddy (I don’t care that you’re not a racist......when the shooting starts it won’t matter what yo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tjd1454
and ended in the Spring of 1865, when Robert E. Lee surrendered the Confederate army to Ulysses S. Grant at Appomattox Courthouse.

Not really, but it sounds good. Of the several dates available, that one has the least claim to the end of the war.

April 9, 1865 - Lee only surrendered the Army of Northern Virginia. General St. John Liddell, perhaps the leading Confederate abolitionist, surrendered the same day.
Mosby disbanded April 21
Joseph Johnson surrendered April 26
the President was captured May 10
Last battle was fought May 13-14.
Kirby Smith surrendered May 26
The last Confederate General, Stand Watie, surrendered on June 23.
The last of the naval forces, the CSS Shenandoah, surrendered November 6.

The war was declared over on August 20, 1866

And, of course, on December 24, 1865, a small group of Confederate officers got together in Pulaski, Tennessee.

13 posted on 01/18/2019 3:27:01 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtymac

“The North, Republicans,etc”

That is an interesting comment.

If President Lincoln, Republicans, and the North were fighting to end slavery then we should be able to read Lincoln’s first inaugural address to the nation and see where he says he and the nation will fight to end slavery.

I just read that address the other day and didn’t see where President Lincoln made that reference. In fact, what I read indicated the exact opposite.

Can you help me find where Lincoln said “we are fighting to free the slaves?”


14 posted on 01/18/2019 3:33:04 PM PST by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: tjd1454

Pundits like to say that generals always want to fight the last war. But anti-slavery crusaders are always crusading against people owning people when the trend for 21st Century slavery is that governments own people. Communists, Socialists, Fascists, World Government elites, and other totalitarians want slaves instead of citizens.

Speech codes, political correctness, and media control enslave minds. Disarming people empowers government authority. A free people must stand in opposition to these trends.


15 posted on 01/18/2019 3:36:01 PM PST by Monterrosa-24 (...even more American than a Russian AK-47 and a French bikini.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

“Same thing going on today. Yes, the Washington/New York corruptocrats are still running things. “

It was a land grab by Northern industrialists and bankers (coastal elites) and they got the rubes to fight it claiming it was about slavery.


16 posted on 01/18/2019 3:40:05 PM PST by dljordan (WhoVoltaire: "To find out who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jeffersondem

the civil war was not fought based upon specific statement made or not made by Lincoln. Even your tagline is overly simplistic and so what. The history of the years prior to the civil war was specifically slave or no slave states and entry into the union. much was stated on the states rights issue but the underlying issue was slavery. Bonners Ferry.
Lincoln wanted to preserve the union but the south wanted to leave for a number of reasons but most especially over the issue of slavery.


17 posted on 01/18/2019 3:53:45 PM PST by dirtymac (Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country! Now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tjd1454

It wasn’t about slavery.


18 posted on 01/18/2019 3:57:08 PM PST by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tjd1454

Human trafficking, aka slavery, is a very lucrative business for those profiting from it. Humans are delivered into all kinds of forced labor situations across our porous border. During Obama’s reign, thousands of “unaccompanied minors” poured across the border; the Obama administration held them in detention centers until they could call a relative in the US to come and get them. The “relatives” were rarely vetted; as a result, the phone numbers the children were told to use were to traffickers, who pretended to be relatives to gain possession of them.

I am certain that the Democrats know full well the extent of human trafficking, every time they blather on about how those poor illegals are just looking for a better life. If they were serious about wanting people in the third world to have better lives, they would be looking into ways to improve third world dungholes. But, somehow, they never do that.


19 posted on 01/18/2019 4:04:45 PM PST by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtymac
“Bonners Ferry.”

I am not familiar with that.

20 posted on 01/18/2019 4:05:38 PM PST by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson