Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Appeals Court Sides With Trump in Transgender Military Case
Newsmax.com ^ | Friday, 04 January 2019 02:56 PM | The Associated Press

Posted on 01/04/2019 5:46:35 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum

A federal appeals court sided with the Trump administration Friday in a case about the Pentagon's effort to restrict military service by transgender people, but the ruling won't change who can serve or enlist at this point.

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled Friday that a lower court judge was wrong to block the Pentagon from implementing plans to restrict the service of transgender individuals. The unsigned ruling will not allow the Pentagon to implement its policy, however, because other judges have entered orders blocking the administration in similar cases.

The administration has already asked the Supreme Court to weigh in. The high court could announce as early as this month if it will do so.

The appeals court ruling said the military's plan appears to rely on the "considered professional judgment" of "appropriate military officials." It noted that the plan "appears to permit some transgender individuals to serve in the military."

Military policy until a few years ago had barred service by transgender individuals. That changed under President Barack Obama's administration. The military announced in 2016 that transgender individuals already serving in the military would be allowed to serve openly. And the military set July 1, 2017, as the date when transgender individuals would be allowed to enlist.

But President Donald Trump's administration delayed the enlistment date, saying the issue needed further study. While that study was ongoing, the president tweeted in late July 2017 that the government would not allow "Transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. Military." He later directed the military to return to its policy before the Obama administration changes.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: brettkavanaugh; dnctalkingpoint; dnctalkingpoints; genderdysphoria; homosexualagenda; scotus

1 posted on 01/04/2019 5:46:35 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

More winning! And the inevitable wails from Democrats and the fake news media.

Music to my ears.


2 posted on 01/04/2019 5:51:46 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I wonder which pair of Sandra Day O’Conners panties Roberts will wear when he rules for the LGBTQWERTY crowd

He inherited her panty drawer from Kennedy when he retired


3 posted on 01/04/2019 5:52:55 PM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48

Everyone knows there are two genders. Unless you ignore biology.


4 posted on 01/04/2019 5:55:46 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

But...but...Liberals are all scien-cy and smart and stuff

I know this, because they keep telling us that


5 posted on 01/04/2019 6:03:04 PM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Imagine sending a battalion of transgenders to take out a few hundred enemy combatants? What are the odds of them succeeding in their mission?

I would bet old granny would put up a harder fight.


6 posted on 01/04/2019 6:13:45 PM PST by Flavious_Maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

There countless “genders”, as they are nothing but social-cultural-psychological constructs. The imagination is the only limit.

OTOH, there are two and only two biological “sexes” (setting aside, for the moment, the question of the minuscule number of “intersexuals”).

The terms are not interchangeable. You fall into “their” trap when you use them interchangeably. The resulting confusion makes rational debate impossible. That is the intent.

There are numerous “transgenders”. There are precisely zero “transsexuals”.


7 posted on 01/04/2019 6:14:26 PM PST by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Flavious_Maximus

our enemies would die....laughing


8 posted on 01/04/2019 6:27:47 PM PST by max americana (Happily Fired every stupid liberal at every election since 08' at work. I hope all liberals die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Just create a tranny Brigade, and all trannies will be assigned to it. Won’t have to worry about bathrooms, dorm rooms, uniform of the day, etc.


9 posted on 01/04/2019 6:43:18 PM PST by realcleanguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48

Roberts has been compromised by the Clapper/Brennan hack. He should be removed from the court immediately.


10 posted on 01/04/2019 7:48:32 PM PST by Fireone (Build the gallows first, then the wall!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled Friday that a lower court judge was wrong to block the Pentagon from implementing plans to restrict the service of transgender individuals. The unsigned ruling will not allow the Pentagon to implement its policy, however, because other judges have entered orders blocking the administration in similar cases.

11 posted on 01/05/2019 2:09:54 AM PST by SunkenCiv (and btw -- https://www.gofundme.com/for-rotator-cuff-repair-surgery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

. . . that a government of the judges, by the judges, for the judges, shall not perish from the earth.

Just keep voting.


12 posted on 01/05/2019 3:59:36 AM PST by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

When did the Federal courts accept “transgender individuals” as a discrete group?


13 posted on 01/05/2019 4:14:19 AM PST by Jim Noble (Freedom is the freedom to say that 2+2 = 4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled Friday that a lower court judge was wrong to block the Pentagon from implementing plans to restrict the service of transgender individuals.

The surgery alone costs close to a hundred grand - then transgenders can't be deployed overseas because they need to be close to their doctors.

It's insane.

Would the Pentagon approve $100,000 worth of plastic surgery for women soldiers ... and keep them stateside so they can be near their doctors? If so, half the middle class women in the country would be signing up.

Nuttiest 'guilt ridden' scam the left has ever come up with... stupid military - corrupt and on the take? Odd how the press can't see the obvious... it's a financial scam that weakens our readiness...

14 posted on 01/05/2019 9:10:24 AM PST by GOPJ (The Left hungers for victims to justify its inflated self-importance & greed for power. Greenfield)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson