Yes, but I suspect Nancy thinks it would be “a nice little arrow to have in her quiver,” as she puts it.
They might end up at Uncle Benito's Esso station against their will.
This is what I posted weeks ago on FR. It’s a loser bet.
First they don’t beleive it. Second nothing is more important than getting Trump out to these people.
So Nancy has admitted (in a roundabout way) that the Mueller investigation is nothing but a witch hunt. The evidence has never been there; the "investigation" should never have been initiated.
Hope they try!
Love to see how that “moderate” lamb votes
[Hahn argued that the best strategy Democrats can pursue to take down Trump would be through investigations so that it’s more difficult for him to be reelected.]
Impeachment by another name.
Dems won’t lose the House if they continue to hone their election fraud schemes with impunity. I foresee many more leftist states legalizing the ballot harvesting fraud schemes that benefited California democrats.
How many House seats are up for grabs in 2020 ?
That’s all PR.
They know, and I know, that Mueller will write a damning report, the media and talking heads and politicians will all blow up and hope for a blood in the water feeding frenzy.
On the strength of that, they will vote to impeach.
In the Senate, they will probably lose, but they have the “impeached” label to hang on Trump and the feeding frenzy.
So, my guess is that Mueller will hold off on his report until this time next year. In the meantime, they’ll examine Trump’s taxes and businesses.
They will lose it faster than that.
I watched this, Tucker out smarted this idiot. He challenged that they must impeach, given all the rhetoric from their party that “Trump is Hitler, etc.” - how can they NOT impeach?? So while this guy tries to explain how it’ll just hurt the party he is also admitting, unintentionally, that the rhetoric is all just nonsense too.
They WILL pursue it. It is in their nature. Their base DEMANDS it.
I think the Rats will try and do impeachment. They will do it for two reasons.
1. 30% - 50% of the rat base is crazy & they demand it! Many new Rat congresscritters owe their seats to that base.
2. There us a desire tar trump (actually any Republican will do!) with the scarlet “I”. of impeachment. Conviction in the Senate is a know non-starter just like with Slick. That’s the point “just like Slick”, draw an equivalency to Slick.
Item # 2 is important for them. That way when anyone points out the rampant corruption in the Rat politico ranks. All apparently acceptable to Rat voters! Where Slick & Hellary set the Gold standard of that corruption. The Rats can claim “See they’re all the same! No difference between Rat & GOP’ers as far as corruption goes! They all do it!”. Sad thing there is just enough corruption by GOP’es to make it plausible. However GOP’er corruption is penny-ante compared to the Rats & the brazenness of the Slick & Hellary. However that requires to much discernment on the part of the average voter to make the distinction sharp enough to make the Rat claim hollow. You only need a simple majority to impeach. The majority that elected Peolosi would have no trouble voting impeachment.
Well then they will lose the house because they will impeach.
they are too stupid not to.
but since we lost a gazillion seats 3 years after election night was over due to finding missing ballots, it will be hard to take back the house
Not impossible
The Democrats are too busy filling out ballots to care.
Yes they will but they will lose in 2020 irregardless because they will lead US into economic stagnation or WORSE!
Our R representative (who was no prize) lost to a female D. In January, I plan on contacting her to tell her that if she pursues the witch hunt on Trump, an assault on the 2nd amendment, and/or further increases in government spending and taxation, I will go door to door to see that she is defeated in the next election.