BREAKING: ANTIFA MOB CURRENTLY OUTSIDE HOME OF TUCKER CARLSON

The Gateway Pundit ^ | November 7, 2018 | Cassandra Fairbanks

[a little elbow grease]

"How much bleep is your skull stuffed with?"

__________

With how much stuff is your skull stuffed?

Calm down, e-s, it's only English. Is it your third language?

[Leep]

I guess they don’t burn crosses anymore?

[a little elbow grease]

"His knees were knocking when the slo-mo video of the WTC tower demolition was played. All he could say was “I'm not a structural engineer.” (I guess that meant what he was seeing wasn't really happening)"

___________

Did little Tucker have any opinion on Building # 7? .

[The Pack Knight]

It is very dangerous to equate common sense with the law.

As a lawyer, I wholeheartedly agree. My point is simply that there are no bright lines with regard to justification for self defense, and one might be reasonable in believing to be in imminent danger with angry mob hurling threats from one's front yard, depending on the circumstances.

[Pravious]

Have you seen that very “out there” Cathy Areu on the show? My lord. She is an interesting character.

—

I don’t find her interesting. Just a bug-eyed, brain-washed leftist idiot (much like the other brain-washed leftist idiots Tucker argues with every night, except for the bug-eyed part).

Cathy and Occasional-Kotex should have a staring contest. I think I’d pay to see that.

[Eleutheria5]

I hope he opens it and sprays them with double ought. Fascist swine deserve it.

Can we possibly sink any lower? Watch us.

[editor-surveyor]

.
I don’t remember if #7 was even discussed.

I was just flabbergasted with his response to the starkly obvious cuting charges going off floor by floor across the building in unison as the tower slumped down.

It woudn’t surprise me if there were a wet spot on his chair.

[editor-surveyor]

.
Its not ‘real talk’ when used rhetorically.

[old curmudgeon]

Well I am not a lawyer

But I carefully read about every self defense case I come across

Just one man lighting a moltov cocktail would be a self defense situation permitting deadly force

But I have read of more than one case that held that threats in do not justify deadly force

You know better than I that it all depends on how politically ambitious the prosecutor is

So I always try to get would be rambos to be careful

[reasonisfaith]

The rule to not end sentences with a preposition is arbitrary, not logical. I don’t follow it because I don’t like it from an aesthetic perspective.

Simply knowing the rule exists doesn’t really mean very much, while following it strictly simply means either you like the rule, or you probably don’t think for yourself. That’s the way I see it.

[reasonisfaith]

I really got a response out of you on this.

My claim here is based on what Tucker said. The method is called speaking about something as though it were a foregone conclusion. He and everyone else on Fox were doing this regarding democrats winning the House for many hours before the polls closed.

Meanwhile, what you’re saying is as long as a talking head is juxtaposed on tv with what looks like their opponent, you’re going to accept that particular dynamic without questioning it or thinking independently.

[reasonisfaith]

So all a subversive anti-American has to do is parrot conservatism on tv, and argue with guests who present as leftists. Then when something that actually makes a difference comes up like on election day, you’ll believe anything he says.

[a little elbow grease]

"Meanwhile, what you’re saying is as long as a talking head is juxtaposed on tv with what looks like their opponent, you’re going to accept that particular dynamic without questioning it or thinking independently."

__________

Is that a question or a statement?

If it's a statement you are making false suppositions ........ now go away.

You really have no reason, but keep the faith, Jesus loves you.

[reasonisfaith]

Tucker has a lot to answer for.

[reasonisfaith]

The method used by Tucker and others like him is based on the fact that people will generally believe not where reason guides them but where their passion lies.

So he goes on the show with leftists who shout at him, and this reinforces what you’ve already accepted as true.

[a little elbow grease]

"Meanwhile, what you’re saying is as long as a talking head is juxtaposed on tv with what looks like their opponent, you’re going to accept that particular dynamic without questioning it or thinking independently."

________________

Again you have no reason ..... shall we call it logic?

I was saying NOTHING like what you ignorantly purport.

YOU WROTE, " as long as a talking head is juxtaposed on tv with what looks like their opponent, you’re going to accept that particular dynamic without questioning it or thinking independently".

That is a lie by you .... a complete misrepresentation, or you are just one ignorant fool.

Go pray for reason on your part. You are NOT exhibiting it.

Please, if you NEED to continue this absurdity, go back to the beginning of this BS, and see just WHERE you began to make assumptions that were and continue to be untrue.

Go pray for reason. I have some faith in you.

[a little elbow grease]

Tell God.

[a little elbow grease]

"The method used by Tucker and others like him is based on the fact that people will generally believe not where reason guides them but where their passion lies.

So he goes on the show with leftists who shout at him, and this reinforces what you’ve already accepted as true."

______________

Hey fool, whom are you talking about, when you write, "So he goes on the show with leftists who shout at him, and this reinforces what ''''YOU'VE''''' already accepted as true."

Whom are you talking about, clown??? Is that your 'IMPERSONAL YOU' that pertains to anyone out here?

Just WHO is being reinforced with leftists shouting on his show? You are either so damn unclear, too damn dumb, or you don't really talk to enough people.

[a little elbow grease]

"When you look at the structure of Aristotelian logic and then you examine any particular example of it, you see that all reason is founded on faith."

________________

lol

[a little elbow grease]

"Tucker has a lot to answer for."

_______________

Sure he does. /s

And you are a pompous, overbearing, affected, and pretentious zealot.

For what do you answer, jughead?