Posted on 10/02/2018 5:34:00 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
FULL TITLE: HUGE! Christine Ford Published 2008 Article on Self-Hypnosis Used to Retrieve and “Create Artificial Situations”
Christine Ford has not turned over her therapist’s notes to the Senate regarding her suppressed memories about Judge Kavanaugh abusing her decades earlier.
This may be because if the memories were revealed through hypnosis they would be “absolutely inadmissible” in the court of law in many states, including New York and Maryland.
There were also accusations that Christine Ford was under a hypnotic trance during her testimony.
Now this…
One of Christine Blasey Ford’s research articles in 2008 included a study on self-hypnosis.
The practice of self-hypnosis is used to retrieve important memories and “create artificial situations.”
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
There were also accusations that Christine Ford was under a hypnotic trance during her testimony.”
Ridiculous but l have no doubt she was “medicated”.
This would explain the bat-sh.t-crazy that radiates from her.
Did you notice the coffee incident?
She was given a cup of coffee, put sugar in it, the man attorney told her to stir it and the ‘woman’ attorney stirred it for her. I think someone wrote that Booker had gotten the coffee.
Just watching it in real time, it struck me as very odd. Her demeanor did seem to change a little but that was absolutely not normal when you go back and watch it.
So that paper is why Ford was asked a question about techniques for retrieving memories by the questioning attorney during the Senate committee hearing. I had thought it was to probe if her therapist had hypnotized her and implanted suggestions. But now her appearance and little-girl voice makes sense — she used a self-hypnotizing on herself to put her into the state of being the 15 year old terrorized by partying boys at a house party. She seemed to snap out of that voice when she made the pseudo-scientific explanation re “hippocampus”. Interesting.
Holy crap. They have ALREADY scrubbed that.
The power to self-delude is very strong in some people. I'm suspect Mrs. Ford is pretty good at it - although not great since she can't spin a convincing tale.
I predict that down the road we will see where this loon offs herself or has some other “unfortunate” (sarc) incident occur in her obviously screwed up life.
Can you imagine living under the same roof, I cant.If so Nurse Ratched would be in charge
In other words, how to lie and make it believable.
Something “added” to the coffee to help Ms. Ford stay in character?
You may be correct. Why coffee when everyone else is drinking water.
Wanna see a live lecture by Ford. They must exist.
I downloaded the article on the study to read for myself later.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, Vol. 64(7), 806—820 (2008) & 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/jclp.20496
I wonder if she wears the ridiculously too large glasses.
I don’t buy-in to the notion of “self-hypnosis”.
I think the left watches too many sci-fi movies and tries to apply the plot(s) to real life.
My question would focus on the (dem operative) lawyers, more than any hocus-pocus hypnosis.
Ford supposedly had a divine epiphany on the very day that Kavenaugh was nominated, accompanied by all these 35-year old, “repressed” memories that he - Kavanaugh - had “sexually attacked” her...at an unknown time, in an unknown place, with “witnesses” who claim to know nothing about it.
So, l’il Chrissy writes a “tell all” letter to a Senator, and it invited to come before the Judicial committee and tell her story of woe.
All she had to do was hop on a plane, fly to DC, tell her story, and then go on back home. But, that would preclude all the drama involved.
It is rumored that the Senator suggested she might need a “lawyer”; a “lawyer” of the Senator’s choosing; a “lawyer” who is a card-carrying, dem operative.
Somewhere along the way, a second lawyer (a senior attorney in a prestigious DC law firm, who resigned his job to represent Dr. Ford, PRO BONO, in her quest to torpedo Kavanaugh.
The bottom line: Why did Ford need two lawyers to surround her like Praetorian guards, shielding her from any probing question, and coaching her on what/how to tell her story? Were either of the two (dem-operative) lawyers present 35 years ago? I thought her story - the same one she told the committee, was their only reference to what (allegedly) happened.
It screams “contrived set up” from the git-go. They were the “directors”, the dems the “producers”, and all she had to do was stick to the script.
The whole, sick, display was Hollywood Loony Toons; the woman is not right.
Self hypnosis? What a laugh. Lying sack of you-know-what is more like it. Her nervousness stemmed more from fear of blowing the script than any 35-year-old “trauma”.
They’ll never convince me that she worked all the way up to, and through, a “Doctorate” degree, worked a job, raised a family, and at the same time has suffered life-long mental anguish from a 25-year-old high school (alleged) incident.
Her weepy, sniveling before the committee would be more indicative of such an event that just happened a month ago. Time heals all wounds and a sane person would be well over any “high school” BS “trauma” by now.
Major Hassan - the ARMY SHRINK who shot all the folks at Ft. Hood, was also a “psychologist”...there’s something wrong with those people, IMHO.
To me, this whole thing is “get Kavanaugh” set up, planned and orchestrated by the demented left. Ford is a tool.
I wish they’d charge her with “lying under oath”, and offer her “immunity” if she’d come clean about how all this transpired. It would be the only way to clear Kavanaugh’s name, and shut up the brigade of “pussy hats” and #MeToo’ers.
/rant off
I have never asked for ..caffeine.. in my life, if I want coffee, I ask for coffee. Strange request.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.