Posted on 09/17/2018 7:46:43 AM PDT by Alberta's Child
Sen. Charles Grassley, chairman of the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee that is scheduled to vote on the suddenly "controversial" nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court, only has to call one witness to address the public allegation that has been made against Kavanaugh by a California woman who claimed he assaulted her when they were both in high school.
The witness is U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), ranking Democrat on the same Judiciary Committee.
1. She allegedly received a letter related to this allegation 2-3 months ago.
2. She never mentioned it in Kavanaugh's confirmation hearing.
3. If the allegation is as serious as she now claims it is, she would have had a RESPONSIBILITY as a U.S. Senator on this committee to question him about it.
4. Within the last 48 hours, Sen. Feinstein issued a public statement explaining her rationale for voting against Kavanaugh's confirmation. She never mentioned this allegation against him even as recently as Saturday night.
Clearly, Sen. Feinstein has a lot of explaining to do. In fact, her testimony about her involvement in this charade and the actions she has taken since she received this letter months ago, is more critical than anyone else's -- including Kavanaugh and his accuser.
Let's get on this, Sen. Grassley.
Feinstein is immune from facing consequences for her actions. As one of the Senate’s “Sainted Ones,” she’s viewed as a venerable institution who must never be question.
*questioned.
I’d say any accuser who waited this long to confront Kavanaugh has dollar signs in front of her eyes & the Sen Feinstein has ......I don’t know....glory signs in front of hers. The whole thing should be completely discounted as it should no longer be relevant even if it happened,which I doubt.
I didn’t think she was running for re-election. After all,she has way overstayed her welcome as it is.
Being in “the club” is why I don’t think the swamp will get truly drained. We need term limits. 12 years or 2 terms is enough for any senator. DIFI won’t even get censured.
Looks like Feinstein slammed the door on her own tits with this story even the democrats think it’s time to color her gone.
Oh she’s more than that. I suspect LIl Diane also gave the slut some advise. ‘Her hon, I’ll hold onto this until you and your Lawyer get your social media footprint cleared up.
Once that is done, give me a call and I’ll leak to the NY Times.’
Put Feinstein under oath after a lie detector by the FBI. 10-1 says she fails the lie detector.
“why was she and her hubby in therapy to begin with?”
I was wondering about that. Something must have been wrong with her marriage... was repressed memory an excuse for her current bad behavior?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.