Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A lowered probability of pregnancy in females in the USA aged 25–29 who received a HPV vaccine...
Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health - Part A ^ | June 11, 2018 | Gayle DeLong

Posted on 06/13/2018 10:36:43 AM PDT by Antoninus

ABSTRACT

Birth rates in the United States have recently fallen. Birth rates per 1000 females aged 25–29 fell from 118 in 2007 to 105 in 2015. One factor may involve the vaccination against the human papillomavirus (HPV). Shortly after the vaccine was licensed, several reports of recipients experiencing primary ovarian failure emerged. This study analyzed information gathered in National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which represented 8 million 25-to-29-year-old women residing in the United States between 2007 and 2014. Approximately 60% of women who did not receive the HPV vaccine had been pregnant at least once, whereas only 35% of women who were exposed to the vaccine had conceived. For married women, 75% who did not receive the shot were found to conceive, while only 50% who received the vaccine had ever been pregnant. Using logistic regression to analyze the data, the probability of having been pregnant was estimated for females who received an HPV vaccine compared with females who did not receive the shot. Results suggest that females who received the HPV shot were less likely to have ever been pregnant than women in the same age group who did not receive the shot. If 100% of females in this study had received the HPV vaccine, data suggest the number of women having ever conceived would have fallen by 2 million. Further study into the influence of HPV vaccine on fertility is thus warranted.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: birthcontrol; hpv; vaccines
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: Lazamataz

I don’t hold you to the same standards as everybody else, Laz. (I think that’s a compliment!)


41 posted on 06/13/2018 2:18:53 PM PDT by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Ah, you hit it out of the park with that snark!!!


42 posted on 06/13/2018 2:19:41 PM PDT by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Nah. 30-50% of articles published in “prestigious science journals” cannot be reproduced. Pardon my skepticism.


43 posted on 06/13/2018 7:21:32 PM PDT by JusPasenThru (We have a mental health problem disguised as a gun problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JusPasenThru
The vaccine is a marker for contraceptive use, that’s all.

I find it hard to believe that a scientific study would not take into account contraceptive use patterns when studying fertility related to a vaccine.

44 posted on 06/13/2018 7:29:35 PM PDT by stig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

The author is a finance professor.

.


45 posted on 06/13/2018 7:34:47 PM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

It is also just a bad idea to give such a thing to an entire generation without seeing long term effects - especially given that there are alternatives.


46 posted on 06/15/2018 3:53:33 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JusPasenThru

It is most likely as you posit - but not necessarily.


47 posted on 06/15/2018 3:54:27 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lepton
Is this "deliberate" back door sterilizing? I just have grave doubts that they haven't known this from all their testing prior to FDA approval.

The cancer rate from HPV is miniscule. Not discounting it....but let's develop an alternative.

48 posted on 06/15/2018 3:57:31 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson