Skip to comments.Mystery in Mueller probe: Where’s the hacking indictment?
Posted on 05/22/2018 8:25:12 AM PDT by Magnatron
In the year since the start of special counsel Robert Muellers investigation, one thing has been notably absent: a public indictment of any Russians for the hacking of the Democratic National Committee (DNC).
Mueller has charged President Trumps former campaign chief, secured guilty pleas from several individuals in Trumps orbit and indicted 13 Russians for an elaborate plot to leverage social media to influence the American electorate.
But the special counsel has yet to announce charges for the hacking of the DNC, even though the intelligence community and private cybersecurity experts linked the attack to the Russian government more than a year ago. Legal experts say there are several possible explanations.
[The reasons] can range from, theres no evidence of any known individuals, to publicly announcing the indictment would compromise other aspects of the investigation said Mark Zaid, a Washington-based attorney specializing in national security.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
But yet we're told the Russians have 30,000 emails from Clinton, Trump paid for the hack, Trump's people transmitted and received data from the hack. And no proof of any of that.
What a farce to ignore such a volume of evidence just to focus on fantasy...
There's no mystery. There was no hack.
“But yet we’re told the Russians have 30,000 emails from Clinton, Trump paid for the hack, Trump’s people transmitted and received data from the hack.”
You must have dreamed that up. Trump has never been accused of that.
There was no hack of the DNC.
It was a leak.
His name was Seth Rich.
He was plugged.
If they admitted they had info from the Podesta’s would bring into focus the crimes alleged in those details. Furthermore, indicting anyone for possessing the Clintoon E mails would make them discoverable and there is a ton of stuff that the “coughing crook” would not want exposed nor would the enigma who ran the most corrupt administration in world history.
Silly boy... only REPUBLICANS get ‘investigated’
I have followed this pretty closely..... I believe the unsourced allegation you reference only stated that Trump acquired the hacked emails from the Russians and provided them to Wikileaks.
Based on the scant evidence we now possess as well as the statements and actions of Assange it appears quite likely that the “hack” was in fact an internal theft involving a DNC staffer who is sadly not available for comment.
I was not aware that Seth Rich was alive and talking until he got to the hospital.
Then a new doctor (sent from ???) stepped into his room, and suddenly he was critically wounded.
If so, any comments about the claims of Guccifer, or any company, or agency, is suspect.
If a company such as a large retailer or bank made these claims, they would be subject to lawsuits at the least.
The data had to have been transferred locally, meaning it was an inside job.
Posts was phished and gave them his password
Mueller is too busy figuring out who sent the Anthrax....
That doctor has some interesting links also.
Silly question: Mule-ear will not go after anything that would lead to ‘discovery’ in the obamaroid or clintoon criminality.
Note also that the Seth Rich incident is almost always characterized as an “attempted robbery”.
There is no evidence for that.
He was not robbed. They did not try to rob him. They roughed him up and they shot him in the back. That’s what happened. That’s properly called “a hit”.
See post #13 in this thread
Hold on. Clinton was so able and competent that she used a private server that was immune from hacking. Well, that's the story.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.